An Appealing Option? The Debate About an ICSID Appellate Structure

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

An Appealing Option? The Debate About an ICSID Appellate Structure. / Tams, Christian J.
Halle: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 2006. p. 1-56 (Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht ; Vol. 57).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

Tams, CJ 2006 'An Appealing Option? The Debate About an ICSID Appellate Structure' Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht , vol. 57, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, pp. 1-56. https://doi.org/10.25673/76560

APA

Tams, C. J. (2006). An Appealing Option? The Debate About an ICSID Appellate Structure. (pp. 1-56). (Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht ; Vol. 57). Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. https://doi.org/10.25673/76560

Vancouver

Tams CJ. An Appealing Option? The Debate About an ICSID Appellate Structure. Halle: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. 2006 Jun, p. 1-56. (Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht ). doi: 10.25673/76560

Bibtex

@techreport{0ff0fd23bd854c9480eb413b8edaf842,
title = "An Appealing Option?: The Debate About an ICSID Appellate Structure",
abstract = "This paper discusses the case for the establishment of an appellate system in international investment law, as put forward notably by the ICSID secretariat. It assess the pros and cons of such an institutional overhaul of the ICSID system, drawing on the experience of other international dispute settlement systems and taking into account factors such as consistency of jurisprudence, quality and accuracy of decisions, finality of awards, costs and speed of proceedings. Having concluded that an institutional overhaul is unlikely and not required, the paper evaluates potential alternatives to an appellate investment system. These include increased consolidation of cases (seen as helpful), broad construction of the existing annulment procedure (unhelpful) and the introduction of a reference procedure modeled on the European Community's experience (the best option).",
keywords = "Law",
author = "Tams, {Christian J.}",
year = "2006",
month = jun,
doi = "10.25673/76560",
language = "English",
isbn = "3-86010-843-3",
series = "Beitr{\"a}ge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht ",
publisher = "Martin-Luther-Universit{\"a}t Halle-Wittenberg",
pages = "1--56",
address = "Germany",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Martin-Luther-Universit{\"a}t Halle-Wittenberg",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - An Appealing Option?

T2 - The Debate About an ICSID Appellate Structure

AU - Tams, Christian J.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - This paper discusses the case for the establishment of an appellate system in international investment law, as put forward notably by the ICSID secretariat. It assess the pros and cons of such an institutional overhaul of the ICSID system, drawing on the experience of other international dispute settlement systems and taking into account factors such as consistency of jurisprudence, quality and accuracy of decisions, finality of awards, costs and speed of proceedings. Having concluded that an institutional overhaul is unlikely and not required, the paper evaluates potential alternatives to an appellate investment system. These include increased consolidation of cases (seen as helpful), broad construction of the existing annulment procedure (unhelpful) and the introduction of a reference procedure modeled on the European Community's experience (the best option).

AB - This paper discusses the case for the establishment of an appellate system in international investment law, as put forward notably by the ICSID secretariat. It assess the pros and cons of such an institutional overhaul of the ICSID system, drawing on the experience of other international dispute settlement systems and taking into account factors such as consistency of jurisprudence, quality and accuracy of decisions, finality of awards, costs and speed of proceedings. Having concluded that an institutional overhaul is unlikely and not required, the paper evaluates potential alternatives to an appellate investment system. These include increased consolidation of cases (seen as helpful), broad construction of the existing annulment procedure (unhelpful) and the introduction of a reference procedure modeled on the European Community's experience (the best option).

KW - Law

U2 - 10.25673/76560

DO - 10.25673/76560

M3 - Working papers

SN - 3-86010-843-3

SN - 978-3-86010-843-7

T3 - Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht

SP - 1

EP - 56

BT - An Appealing Option?

PB - Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg

CY - Halle

ER -

Documents

DOI