Agents, Audiences, and Peers: why international organizations diversify their legitimation discourse
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: International Affairs, Vol. 99, No. 3, 01.05.2023, p. 921-940.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Agents, Audiences, and Peers
T2 - why international organizations diversify their legitimation discourse
AU - Lenz, Tobias
AU - Schmidtke, Henning
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - In the face of public contestation, international organizations (IOs) invoke norms in their public communication to enhance relevant audiences' legitimacy beliefs. This article offers the first comprehensive analysis of what we term normative diversity in IOs' discursive legitimation by drawing on a novel dataset on norm-based justifications in more than 32,000 paragraphs of text published by 28 regional IOs between 1980 and 2019. We show that IOs vary strikingly in this respect: whereas some IOs invoke a narrow set of norms, often focused on economic welfare and functional capability, others engage a wide variety that includes security, national sovereignty, democracy or human rights. To explain this variance, we specify and test an explanatory framework that emphasizes IO audiences, agents and peer organizations as distinct origins. Our statistical analysis reveals that IOs diversify their discursive legitimation to 1) address heterogeneous audiences, 2) reconcile competing beliefs amongst agents themselves, and 3) integrate the legitimation of peer IOs. These findings indicate that IOs respond to the growing complexity of international cooperation in their discursive legitimation and may raise policy-makers' awareness of the difficulties in contemporary legitimation efforts.
AB - In the face of public contestation, international organizations (IOs) invoke norms in their public communication to enhance relevant audiences' legitimacy beliefs. This article offers the first comprehensive analysis of what we term normative diversity in IOs' discursive legitimation by drawing on a novel dataset on norm-based justifications in more than 32,000 paragraphs of text published by 28 regional IOs between 1980 and 2019. We show that IOs vary strikingly in this respect: whereas some IOs invoke a narrow set of norms, often focused on economic welfare and functional capability, others engage a wide variety that includes security, national sovereignty, democracy or human rights. To explain this variance, we specify and test an explanatory framework that emphasizes IO audiences, agents and peer organizations as distinct origins. Our statistical analysis reveals that IOs diversify their discursive legitimation to 1) address heterogeneous audiences, 2) reconcile competing beliefs amongst agents themselves, and 3) integrate the legitimation of peer IOs. These findings indicate that IOs respond to the growing complexity of international cooperation in their discursive legitimation and may raise policy-makers' awareness of the difficulties in contemporary legitimation efforts.
KW - Politics
KW - international relations theory
KW - international governance
KW - law
KW - ethics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161274557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ia/iiac323
DO - 10.1093/ia/iiac323
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 99
SP - 921
EP - 940
JO - International Affairs
JF - International Affairs
SN - 0020-5850
IS - 3
ER -