Affective boundaries: The power effects of objects of emotion in collaborative encounters

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Affective boundaries: The power effects of objects of emotion in collaborative encounters. / Dahlman, Sara.
In: Organization, Vol. 31, No. 6, 09.2024, p. 952-969.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b0ccee5d9a444d6386f57060989385e6,
title = "Affective boundaries: The power effects of objects of emotion in collaborative encounters",
abstract = "Organization studies has (re)turned to affect, a development that has brought affective tensions—build-ups of energy, or vitalities—to the fore of research. Previous studies on affect in organizations underline the organizational and transformational effects of affective milieus or atmospheres. I contribute to this research with a micro perspective on how affect shapes intersubjective relationships. I do so through an ethnographically inspired study of SusPens, a fin-tech start-up that uses algorithmic tools to screen sustainable investments. In the course of my empirical engagement, I identified recurring tensions in the collaboration between tech professionals and business professionals. I unpack these tensions in three collaborative encounters, focusing on how the algorithm functioned as a common reference point as well as a barrier for the collaboration. To conceptualize the observed tensions, the article builds on Sara Ahmed{\textquoteright}s concept of objects of emotion and introduces affective boundaries as a theoretical construct for understanding the power effects of affective circulation. The article details how affective boundaries are installed through the affective misalignments that arise as the algorithm circulates as an object of emotion among the team members. The article concludes that the installment of affective boundaries delineates who is included in and who is excluded from the collaboration, pointing to how power works affectively in intersubjective relations, empowering some and disqualifying others.",
keywords = "Affect, affective boundaries, objects of emotion, Sara Ahmed, writing differently, Management studies",
author = "Sara Dahlman",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1177/13505084231151764",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "952--969",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affective boundaries

T2 - The power effects of objects of emotion in collaborative encounters

AU - Dahlman, Sara

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.

PY - 2024/9

Y1 - 2024/9

N2 - Organization studies has (re)turned to affect, a development that has brought affective tensions—build-ups of energy, or vitalities—to the fore of research. Previous studies on affect in organizations underline the organizational and transformational effects of affective milieus or atmospheres. I contribute to this research with a micro perspective on how affect shapes intersubjective relationships. I do so through an ethnographically inspired study of SusPens, a fin-tech start-up that uses algorithmic tools to screen sustainable investments. In the course of my empirical engagement, I identified recurring tensions in the collaboration between tech professionals and business professionals. I unpack these tensions in three collaborative encounters, focusing on how the algorithm functioned as a common reference point as well as a barrier for the collaboration. To conceptualize the observed tensions, the article builds on Sara Ahmed’s concept of objects of emotion and introduces affective boundaries as a theoretical construct for understanding the power effects of affective circulation. The article details how affective boundaries are installed through the affective misalignments that arise as the algorithm circulates as an object of emotion among the team members. The article concludes that the installment of affective boundaries delineates who is included in and who is excluded from the collaboration, pointing to how power works affectively in intersubjective relations, empowering some and disqualifying others.

AB - Organization studies has (re)turned to affect, a development that has brought affective tensions—build-ups of energy, or vitalities—to the fore of research. Previous studies on affect in organizations underline the organizational and transformational effects of affective milieus or atmospheres. I contribute to this research with a micro perspective on how affect shapes intersubjective relationships. I do so through an ethnographically inspired study of SusPens, a fin-tech start-up that uses algorithmic tools to screen sustainable investments. In the course of my empirical engagement, I identified recurring tensions in the collaboration between tech professionals and business professionals. I unpack these tensions in three collaborative encounters, focusing on how the algorithm functioned as a common reference point as well as a barrier for the collaboration. To conceptualize the observed tensions, the article builds on Sara Ahmed’s concept of objects of emotion and introduces affective boundaries as a theoretical construct for understanding the power effects of affective circulation. The article details how affective boundaries are installed through the affective misalignments that arise as the algorithm circulates as an object of emotion among the team members. The article concludes that the installment of affective boundaries delineates who is included in and who is excluded from the collaboration, pointing to how power works affectively in intersubjective relations, empowering some and disqualifying others.

KW - Affect

KW - affective boundaries

KW - objects of emotion

KW - Sara Ahmed

KW - writing differently

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147684425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/13505084231151764

DO - 10.1177/13505084231151764

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85147684425

VL - 31

SP - 952

EP - 969

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

IS - 6

ER -