Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods. / Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gómez-Baggethun, Erik; Martín-López, Berta et al.
in: Environmental Values, Jahrgang 27, Nr. 1, 01.02.2018, S. 29-53.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Arias-Arévalo P, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Pérez-Rincón M. Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods. Environmental Values. 2018 Feb 1;27(1):29-53. doi: 10.3197/096327118X15144698637513

Bibtex

@article{b16f9a1419c14223990299fc35377ec9,
title = "Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods",
abstract = "Researchers working in the field of ecosystem services (ES) have long acknowledged the importance of recognising multiple values in ecosystems and biodiversity. Yet the operationalisation of value pluralism in ES assessments remains largely elusive. The aim of this research is to present a taxonomy of values and valuation methods to widen the evaluative space for ES. First, we present our preanalytic positions in regards to the values and valuation of ES. Second, we review different value definitions that we deem relevant for the discussion of ES valuation. Third, we propose a taxonomy of ES values based on different conceptions of human-nature relationships. Finally, we present a taxonomy of different methods that can be used to recognise plural values in ES. This taxonomy for a plural valuation can help ES scientists and practitioners with their aim of representing people{\textquoteright}s multiple and context-specific ways of valuing nature. The taxonomy can also serve to pay broader attention to ES values that are overlooked or misrepresented in assessments that restrict their focus to monetary valuations.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Ecosystem services, incommensurability, monetary and non-monetary valuation, value pluralism, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Paola Arias-Ar{\'e}valo and Erik G{\'o}mez-Baggethun and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Mario P{\'e}rez-Rinc{\'o}n",
year = "2018",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3197/096327118X15144698637513",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "29--53",
journal = "Environmental Values",
issn = "0963-2719",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services

T2 - A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods

AU - Arias-Arévalo, Paola

AU - Gómez-Baggethun, Erik

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Pérez-Rincón, Mario

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Researchers working in the field of ecosystem services (ES) have long acknowledged the importance of recognising multiple values in ecosystems and biodiversity. Yet the operationalisation of value pluralism in ES assessments remains largely elusive. The aim of this research is to present a taxonomy of values and valuation methods to widen the evaluative space for ES. First, we present our preanalytic positions in regards to the values and valuation of ES. Second, we review different value definitions that we deem relevant for the discussion of ES valuation. Third, we propose a taxonomy of ES values based on different conceptions of human-nature relationships. Finally, we present a taxonomy of different methods that can be used to recognise plural values in ES. This taxonomy for a plural valuation can help ES scientists and practitioners with their aim of representing people’s multiple and context-specific ways of valuing nature. The taxonomy can also serve to pay broader attention to ES values that are overlooked or misrepresented in assessments that restrict their focus to monetary valuations.

AB - Researchers working in the field of ecosystem services (ES) have long acknowledged the importance of recognising multiple values in ecosystems and biodiversity. Yet the operationalisation of value pluralism in ES assessments remains largely elusive. The aim of this research is to present a taxonomy of values and valuation methods to widen the evaluative space for ES. First, we present our preanalytic positions in regards to the values and valuation of ES. Second, we review different value definitions that we deem relevant for the discussion of ES valuation. Third, we propose a taxonomy of ES values based on different conceptions of human-nature relationships. Finally, we present a taxonomy of different methods that can be used to recognise plural values in ES. This taxonomy for a plural valuation can help ES scientists and practitioners with their aim of representing people’s multiple and context-specific ways of valuing nature. The taxonomy can also serve to pay broader attention to ES values that are overlooked or misrepresented in assessments that restrict their focus to monetary valuations.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - incommensurability

KW - monetary and non-monetary valuation

KW - value pluralism

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040183750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3197/096327118X15144698637513

DO - 10.3197/096327118X15144698637513

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 27

SP - 29

EP - 53

JO - Environmental Values

JF - Environmental Values

SN - 0963-2719

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Was zählt die Stimme einer Lehrkraft ?
  2. Nitrogen deposition and drought events have non-additive effects on plant growth – Evidence from greenhouse experiments
  3. Beyond budgeting
  4. Organizational public value and employee life satisfaction
  5. Toleranzedikt des Fetischismus
  6. Imagination and organization studies
  7. Freie Berufe im Wandel der Märkte
  8. Modern Property Valuation Methods for Masonry Houses in Germany
  9. Organic farming promotes bee abundance in vineyards in Italy but not in South Africa
  10. Ansatz- und Bewertungsstetigkeit
  11. Der Kunde als Innovationsquelle
  12. Vertrauen
  13. Transitions to plant-based diets
  14. Article 80 CISG
  15. Article 78 CISG
  16. Vorwort
  17. A New Climate for Europe
  18. Weltölmärkte
  19. Dritte Dimension fehlt
  20. Determinanten der Busnutzungsbereitschaft
  21. Krieg in der Zivilgesellschaft
  22. Structural forces driving local responsiveness
  23. § 289d Nutzung von Rahmenwerken
  24. „Und das nenn' ich Nehmermentalität."
  25. Personalstrategien in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen
  26. Social Desirability and its Impact on Audience Research
  27. The pencil of cheap nature
  28. Vertrauensbasiert kooperieren
  29. Trends Towards Pure Leisure
  30. Vervielfachen von Längen - Kompetenzen und Schwierigkeiten von Drittklässlern in zwei Sachkontexten
  31. Form ever follows function: Jane Addams Sozialreform und die Architektur Louis Sullivans and Frank Lloyd Wrights
  32. 10 Jahre Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB) der Universität Lüneburg
  33. Trügerische Sicherheit
  34. The impact of climate change on aquatic risk from agricultural pesticides in the US
  35. Fernsehen und Molekulare Medizin
  36. Freie Berufe im Wandel der Arbeitsmärkte
  37. Die Verschuldungskapazität
  38. Super Trouper
  39. Gender management, popular culture, and the military
  40. § 48 Solare Strahlungsenergie
  41. Wer berichtet, wird besser
  42. § 289f Erklärung zur Unternehmensführung
  43. Gender equality and democracy
  44. Friedrich von Hardenbergs poetisierte Rhetorik
  45. Augmented Reality als Bildungsenhancement?