Vertikale Gewaltenteilung: Institutionenpolitische Leitidee oder demokratietheoretische Chiffre? Reform westeuropäischer Bundes- und Einheitsstaaten im Vergleich

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Vertikale Gewaltenteilung: Institutionenpolitische Leitidee oder demokratietheoretische Chiffre? Reform westeuropäischer Bundes- und Einheitsstaaten im Vergleich. / Grotz, Florian.

in: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, Jahrgang 38, Nr. 4, 01.01.2007, S. 775-797.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c820e86d6fee4dca9ef69bd0965e8451,
title = "Vertikale Gewaltenteilung: Institutionenpolitische Leitidee oder demokratietheoretische Chiffre?: Reform westeurop{\"a}ischer Bundes- und Einheitsstaaten im Vergleich",
abstract = "'From a democratic theoretical perspective, the vertical limitation of central state power is usually regarded as the main reason for establishing federal order. However, in political reality, this normative principle constitutes only one of several explanations for the processes of decentralization or federalization. The question is, if, and to what extent, the idea of 'vertical separation of powers', has guided recent state reforms in Western Europe. Both centralization and decentralization of a democratic state may be justified by different theoretical objectives. Furthermore, the political salience of relevant arguments depends on contextual preconditions (territorial cleavages, party system congruence, and federal/ unitary form of state). The comparative analysis of respective reform processes in two federal (Germany, Austria), and two unitary cases (Italy, Great Britain), reveals that 'vertical separation of powers', has not been present as a guiding principle, and has not played a key role in these decentralization contexts.' (author's abstract)",
keywords = "Politikwissenschaft, Europ{\"a}ische Union , Gewaltenteilung , Internationaler Vergleich ",
author = "Florian Grotz",
note = "Literaturangaben",
year = "2007",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5771/0340-1758-2007-4-775",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "38",
pages = "775--797",
journal = "Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Parlamentsfragen",
issn = "0340-1758",
publisher = "Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vertikale Gewaltenteilung: Institutionenpolitische Leitidee oder demokratietheoretische Chiffre?

T2 - Reform westeuropäischer Bundes- und Einheitsstaaten im Vergleich

AU - Grotz, Florian

N1 - Literaturangaben

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - 'From a democratic theoretical perspective, the vertical limitation of central state power is usually regarded as the main reason for establishing federal order. However, in political reality, this normative principle constitutes only one of several explanations for the processes of decentralization or federalization. The question is, if, and to what extent, the idea of 'vertical separation of powers', has guided recent state reforms in Western Europe. Both centralization and decentralization of a democratic state may be justified by different theoretical objectives. Furthermore, the political salience of relevant arguments depends on contextual preconditions (territorial cleavages, party system congruence, and federal/ unitary form of state). The comparative analysis of respective reform processes in two federal (Germany, Austria), and two unitary cases (Italy, Great Britain), reveals that 'vertical separation of powers', has not been present as a guiding principle, and has not played a key role in these decentralization contexts.' (author's abstract)

AB - 'From a democratic theoretical perspective, the vertical limitation of central state power is usually regarded as the main reason for establishing federal order. However, in political reality, this normative principle constitutes only one of several explanations for the processes of decentralization or federalization. The question is, if, and to what extent, the idea of 'vertical separation of powers', has guided recent state reforms in Western Europe. Both centralization and decentralization of a democratic state may be justified by different theoretical objectives. Furthermore, the political salience of relevant arguments depends on contextual preconditions (territorial cleavages, party system congruence, and federal/ unitary form of state). The comparative analysis of respective reform processes in two federal (Germany, Austria), and two unitary cases (Italy, Great Britain), reveals that 'vertical separation of powers', has not been present as a guiding principle, and has not played a key role in these decentralization contexts.' (author's abstract)

KW - Politikwissenschaft

KW - Europäische Union

KW - Gewaltenteilung

KW - Internationaler Vergleich

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4e31daaf-d66d-3889-8e0a-03aa1ecb8463/

U2 - 10.5771/0340-1758-2007-4-775

DO - 10.5771/0340-1758-2007-4-775

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

VL - 38

SP - 775

EP - 797

JO - Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen

JF - Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen

SN - 0340-1758

IS - 4

ER -

DOI