Utilization of organic residues using heterotrophic microalgae and insects

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Utilization of organic residues using heterotrophic microalgae and insects. / Pleißner, Daniel; Rumpold, Birgit A.
in: Waste Management, Jahrgang 72, 01.02.2018, S. 227-239.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Pleißner D, Rumpold BA. Utilization of organic residues using heterotrophic microalgae and insects. Waste Management. 2018 Feb 1;72:227-239. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.020

Bibtex

@article{bf506ced5d4d4cc6bffe5468ea369c49,
title = "Utilization of organic residues using heterotrophic microalgae and insects",
abstract = "Various organic residues occur globally in the form of straw, wood, green biomass, food waste, feces, manure etc. Other utilization strategies apart from anaerobic digestion, composting and incineration are needed to make use of the whole potential of organic residues as sources of various value added compounds. This review compares the cultivation of heterotrophic microalgae and insects using organic residues as nutrient sources and illuminates their potential with regard to biomass production, productivity and yield, and utilization strategies of produced biomasses. Furthermore, cultivation processes as well as advantages and disadvantages of utilization processes are identified and discussed. It was shown that both heterotrophic algae and insects are able to reduce a sufficient amount of organic residues by converting it into biomass. The biomass composition of both organisms is similar which allows similar utilization strategies in food and feed, chemicals and materials productions. Even though insect is the more complex organism, biomass production can be carried out using simple equipment without sterilization and hydrolysis of organic residues. Contrarily, heterotrophic microalgae require a pretreatment of organic residues in form of sterilization and in most cases hydrolysis. Interestingly, the volumetric productivity of insect biomass exceeds the productivity of algal biomass. Despite legal restrictions, it is expected that microalgae and insects will find application as alternative food and feed sources in the future.",
keywords = "Conversion, Edible insects, Microalgae, Organic residues, Reduction, Utilization, Chemistry",
author = "Daniel Plei{\ss}ner and Rumpold, {Birgit A.}",
year = "2018",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.020",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "227--239",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilization of organic residues using heterotrophic microalgae and insects

AU - Pleißner, Daniel

AU - Rumpold, Birgit A.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Various organic residues occur globally in the form of straw, wood, green biomass, food waste, feces, manure etc. Other utilization strategies apart from anaerobic digestion, composting and incineration are needed to make use of the whole potential of organic residues as sources of various value added compounds. This review compares the cultivation of heterotrophic microalgae and insects using organic residues as nutrient sources and illuminates their potential with regard to biomass production, productivity and yield, and utilization strategies of produced biomasses. Furthermore, cultivation processes as well as advantages and disadvantages of utilization processes are identified and discussed. It was shown that both heterotrophic algae and insects are able to reduce a sufficient amount of organic residues by converting it into biomass. The biomass composition of both organisms is similar which allows similar utilization strategies in food and feed, chemicals and materials productions. Even though insect is the more complex organism, biomass production can be carried out using simple equipment without sterilization and hydrolysis of organic residues. Contrarily, heterotrophic microalgae require a pretreatment of organic residues in form of sterilization and in most cases hydrolysis. Interestingly, the volumetric productivity of insect biomass exceeds the productivity of algal biomass. Despite legal restrictions, it is expected that microalgae and insects will find application as alternative food and feed sources in the future.

AB - Various organic residues occur globally in the form of straw, wood, green biomass, food waste, feces, manure etc. Other utilization strategies apart from anaerobic digestion, composting and incineration are needed to make use of the whole potential of organic residues as sources of various value added compounds. This review compares the cultivation of heterotrophic microalgae and insects using organic residues as nutrient sources and illuminates their potential with regard to biomass production, productivity and yield, and utilization strategies of produced biomasses. Furthermore, cultivation processes as well as advantages and disadvantages of utilization processes are identified and discussed. It was shown that both heterotrophic algae and insects are able to reduce a sufficient amount of organic residues by converting it into biomass. The biomass composition of both organisms is similar which allows similar utilization strategies in food and feed, chemicals and materials productions. Even though insect is the more complex organism, biomass production can be carried out using simple equipment without sterilization and hydrolysis of organic residues. Contrarily, heterotrophic microalgae require a pretreatment of organic residues in form of sterilization and in most cases hydrolysis. Interestingly, the volumetric productivity of insect biomass exceeds the productivity of algal biomass. Despite legal restrictions, it is expected that microalgae and insects will find application as alternative food and feed sources in the future.

KW - Conversion

KW - Edible insects

KW - Microalgae

KW - Organic residues

KW - Reduction

KW - Utilization

KW - Chemistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035103506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.020

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.020

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 29150257

AN - SCOPUS:85035103506

VL - 72

SP - 227

EP - 239

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. The structure of contributing factors of human error in safety-critical industries
  2. Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes?
  3. Perspektiven der Teilwertabschreibung bei voraussichtlich dauernder Wertminderung
  4. Do TCFD-aligned firms really care for climate change, or solely for their investors?
  5. Zivilrechtliche Haftungsrisiken bei der Zusammenarbeit von Schule und Jugendhilfe
  6. Landscape models for use in studies of landscape change and habitat fragmentation
  7. Beschwerdemanagement in stationären Wohngruppen zwischen Partizipation und Schutz
  8. Inversion of fuzzy neural networks for the reduction of noise in the control loop
  9. Toward landscape-wide conservation outcomes in Australia's temperate grazing region
  10. Modellierung und Implementierung eines Order2Cash-Prozesses in verteilten Systemen
  11. The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression on suicidality and hopelessness
  12. "j'ai écrit ma vie". Die autobiographischen Legitimierungsstrategien Gustave Courbets
  13. "Wir wissen nicht, was wir tun sollen" - Expertisierte Raumaneignung und -konstruktion
  14. Digitale Gesundheitskompetenz von Studierenden? Ergebnisse aus dem COVID-HL Netzwerk
  15. Step on it! How Positive Affective States Influence Young Drivers’ Driving Behaviors
  16. Research-based coaching of academic staff as means to improve Engineering Education
  17. Social justice for traditional knowledge holders will help conserve Europe's nature
  18. Globalising the Study of Diffusion: Multiple Sources and the East African Community
  19. Unraveling Privacy Concerns in Complex Data Ecosystems with Architectural Thinking
  20. Arable vegetation of calcareous soils (Caucalidion) Plant community of the year 2022
  21. Kritik und Widerstand aus politiktheoretischer und politikdidaktischer Perspektive.
  22. A conceptual cross-disciplinary model of organizational practices for older workers
  23. Potential impact of climate change effects on preferences for tourism destinations
  24. Pandemische politische Ökonomie: Zur kapitalistischen Verarbeitung der Corona-Krise
  25. Trust in scientists, risk perception, conspiratorial beliefs, and unrealistic optimism
  26. Strategien und Umsetzungspotenziale einer Berufsbildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung
  27. ‘Speed Metal’ - Medien industrieller Produktion und tayloristische Arbeitsorganisation
  28. Frauen arbeiten ander(e)s: Frauenarbeit in personenbezogenen sozialen Dienstleistungen
  29. The impact of linguistic complexity on the solution of mathematical modelling tasks
  30. Quantifying ecosystem services of rewetted peatlands − the MoorFutures methodologies
  31. Der gemeinnützige Familienstiftungsverbund als Instrument der Unternehmensnachfolge