The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management. / Dmytriyev, Sergiy D.; Freeman, R. Edward; Hörisch, Jacob.
in: Journal of Management Studies, Jahrgang 58, Nr. 6, 09.2021, S. 1441-1470.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{53bf39da3a4b45498af6950f5fd26699,
title = "The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management",
abstract = "Although stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR) have evolved into major theoretical frameworks for exploring social issues in management, there is a limited and often misleading understanding of the relationship between them that inhibits the management field from adopting a social orientation to a full extent. Our aim is to remove unnecessary barriers that preclude collaboration between scholars in the stakeholder theory and CSR camps; empower organizational scholars and practitioners with a more nuanced language for dealing with social issues in management; and enable the creation of a coherent and integrative theoretical foundation in the area of social issues in management that has previously been at a disadvantage to other areas in management. In our conceptual analysis, we argue that stakeholder theory and CSR provide distinct but complementary theoretical frameworks with some overlap. The actual decision to choose a particular framework depends on the problem one wants to solve and the settings of that problem.",
keywords = "corporate responsibility, corporate social responsibility (CSR), social issues in management, stakeholder theory, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Dmytriyev, {Sergiy D.} and Freeman, {R. Edward} and Jacob H{\"o}risch",
note = "Funding Information: The authors thank the general editor Jonathan Doh and the three anonymous reviewers for their very valuable comments and suggestions. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1111/joms.12684",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "1441--1470",
journal = "Journal of Management Studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management

AU - Dmytriyev, Sergiy D.

AU - Freeman, R. Edward

AU - Hörisch, Jacob

N1 - Funding Information: The authors thank the general editor Jonathan Doh and the three anonymous reviewers for their very valuable comments and suggestions. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Although stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR) have evolved into major theoretical frameworks for exploring social issues in management, there is a limited and often misleading understanding of the relationship between them that inhibits the management field from adopting a social orientation to a full extent. Our aim is to remove unnecessary barriers that preclude collaboration between scholars in the stakeholder theory and CSR camps; empower organizational scholars and practitioners with a more nuanced language for dealing with social issues in management; and enable the creation of a coherent and integrative theoretical foundation in the area of social issues in management that has previously been at a disadvantage to other areas in management. In our conceptual analysis, we argue that stakeholder theory and CSR provide distinct but complementary theoretical frameworks with some overlap. The actual decision to choose a particular framework depends on the problem one wants to solve and the settings of that problem.

AB - Although stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR) have evolved into major theoretical frameworks for exploring social issues in management, there is a limited and often misleading understanding of the relationship between them that inhibits the management field from adopting a social orientation to a full extent. Our aim is to remove unnecessary barriers that preclude collaboration between scholars in the stakeholder theory and CSR camps; empower organizational scholars and practitioners with a more nuanced language for dealing with social issues in management; and enable the creation of a coherent and integrative theoretical foundation in the area of social issues in management that has previously been at a disadvantage to other areas in management. In our conceptual analysis, we argue that stakeholder theory and CSR provide distinct but complementary theoretical frameworks with some overlap. The actual decision to choose a particular framework depends on the problem one wants to solve and the settings of that problem.

KW - corporate responsibility

KW - corporate social responsibility (CSR)

KW - social issues in management

KW - stakeholder theory

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102207009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/c46fb1e1-fbfd-3103-bca4-a2a22c61db80/

U2 - 10.1111/joms.12684

DO - 10.1111/joms.12684

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85102207009

VL - 58

SP - 1441

EP - 1470

JO - Journal of Management Studies

JF - Journal of Management Studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 6

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Comparison of an Electrochemical and Luminescence-Based Oxygen Measuring System for Use in the Biodegradability Testing According to Closed Bottle Test (OECD 301D)
  2. Zur Arbeitszeit von freiberuflichen Ärzten in Deutschland – Eine Übersicht über vorhanden Informationen und Fallzahlen in amtlichen und nichtamtlichen Statistiken
  3. Erfassung von Belastungs- und Burnout-Erleben parallel zu einem Screening psychischer Störungen im Internet: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen, am Beispiel des „Stress-Monitors"
  4. The Timing of Daily Demand for Goods and Services - Microsimulation Policy Results of an Aging Society, Increasing Labour Market Flexibility, and Extended Public Childcare in Germany
  5. Die gegen das Drittelbeteiligungsgesetz verstoßende Aufsichtsratslücke im Dienstleistungssektor existiert. Replik zu "Das Fehlen eines Aufsichtsrates muss nicht rechtswidrig sein" von Alexander Dilger
  6. Alan L. Carsud and Malin Braennback (eds), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: Opening the black box. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 24. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009. 340 pp. ISBN 9781441904423.
  7. Relevanz von Rechnungslegungsempfehlungen des Deutschen Rechnungslegungs Standards Committee (DRSC) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Deutschen Rechnungslegungsstandards Nr. (DRS) 20 (Konzernlagebericht)
  8. „also habe ich mich entschieden, mich nicht zu entscheiden“ Biografische Bildungsentscheidungen als Nicht-Entscheidungen in Lebensgeschichten junger Frauen mit Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland und Frankreich
  9. BESUB III – Zur Beschreibung der Sichtstrukturen kaufmännischen Unterrichts entlang von Sozialformen und Unterrichtsphasen - Ergebnisse einer vertiefenden Analyse mit einem ausdifferenzierten Erhebungsinstrument