The Manifold Impacts of Management Research

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The Manifold Impacts of Management Research. / Wenzel, Matthias; Gylfe, Philip; Mantere, Saku et al.
in: Journal of Management Studies, 14.05.2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Wenzel, M., Gylfe, P., Mantere, S., & Cornelissen, J. (2025). The Manifold Impacts of Management Research. Journal of Management Studies. Vorzeitige Online-Publikation. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13240

Vancouver

Wenzel M, Gylfe P, Mantere S, Cornelissen J. The Manifold Impacts of Management Research. Journal of Management Studies. 2025 Mai 14. Epub 2025 Mai 14. doi: 10.1111/joms.13240

Bibtex

@article{7301267e3b9a4dfaabb105cf35296031,
title = "The Manifold Impacts of Management Research",
abstract = "Management scholarship's apparent lack of impact is a misconception based on the presumption that impact involves a direct and visible influence of papers or research projects on management practice. Theory-building impacts management practice in diverse, sometimes indirect and unnoticed, manifold ways. Supported by intermediaries such as management education, the media, and consulting, impacts emerge through interest-driven knowledge production that contributes to the wider uptake and reproduction of management theory's main ideas and assumptions. We draw on J{\"u}rgen Habermas's theory of knowledge and human interests, aiming to expand how impact from scholarship can be understood, and what forms it might take as part of the kinds of knowledge-constitutive interests that are pursued through theory-building. We elaborate these different forms, building a pluralist framework of what we call {\textquoteleft}programmatic{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}hybrid{\textquoteright} types of impact. We advance the argument that diverse knowledge-constitutive interests pursued through theory-building contribute to our field's impact on management practice in distinct, yet complementary ways.",
keywords = "impact, knowledge-constitutive interests, research programs, theory-building, Management studies",
author = "Matthias Wenzel and Philip Gylfe and Saku Mantere and Joep Cornelissen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Management Studies published by Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2025",
month = may,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1111/joms.13240",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Management Studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Manifold Impacts of Management Research

AU - Wenzel, Matthias

AU - Gylfe, Philip

AU - Mantere, Saku

AU - Cornelissen, Joep

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Management Studies published by Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2025/5/14

Y1 - 2025/5/14

N2 - Management scholarship's apparent lack of impact is a misconception based on the presumption that impact involves a direct and visible influence of papers or research projects on management practice. Theory-building impacts management practice in diverse, sometimes indirect and unnoticed, manifold ways. Supported by intermediaries such as management education, the media, and consulting, impacts emerge through interest-driven knowledge production that contributes to the wider uptake and reproduction of management theory's main ideas and assumptions. We draw on Jürgen Habermas's theory of knowledge and human interests, aiming to expand how impact from scholarship can be understood, and what forms it might take as part of the kinds of knowledge-constitutive interests that are pursued through theory-building. We elaborate these different forms, building a pluralist framework of what we call ‘programmatic’ and ‘hybrid’ types of impact. We advance the argument that diverse knowledge-constitutive interests pursued through theory-building contribute to our field's impact on management practice in distinct, yet complementary ways.

AB - Management scholarship's apparent lack of impact is a misconception based on the presumption that impact involves a direct and visible influence of papers or research projects on management practice. Theory-building impacts management practice in diverse, sometimes indirect and unnoticed, manifold ways. Supported by intermediaries such as management education, the media, and consulting, impacts emerge through interest-driven knowledge production that contributes to the wider uptake and reproduction of management theory's main ideas and assumptions. We draw on Jürgen Habermas's theory of knowledge and human interests, aiming to expand how impact from scholarship can be understood, and what forms it might take as part of the kinds of knowledge-constitutive interests that are pursued through theory-building. We elaborate these different forms, building a pluralist framework of what we call ‘programmatic’ and ‘hybrid’ types of impact. We advance the argument that diverse knowledge-constitutive interests pursued through theory-building contribute to our field's impact on management practice in distinct, yet complementary ways.

KW - impact

KW - knowledge-constitutive interests

KW - research programs

KW - theory-building

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005404010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/joms.13240

DO - 10.1111/joms.13240

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105005404010

JO - Journal of Management Studies

JF - Journal of Management Studies

SN - 0022-2380

ER -

DOI