The Influence of Tree Diversity on Natural Enemies—a Review of the “Enemies” Hypothesis in Forests

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

The Influence of Tree Diversity on Natural Enemies—a Review of the “Enemies” Hypothesis in Forests. / Staab, Michael; Schuldt, Andreas.
in: Current Forestry Reports, Jahrgang 6, Nr. 4, 01.12.2020, S. 243-259.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{23b888172a704a00b12dd9871e3289cf,
title = "The Influence of Tree Diversity on Natural Enemies—a Review of the “Enemies” Hypothesis in Forests",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: Natural enemies are an important component for forest functioning. By consuming herbivores, they can be effective top-down regulators of potential pest species. Tree mixtures are generally expected to have larger predator and parasitoid populations compared to monocultures. This assumption is based on the “enemies” hypothesis, a classical ecological concept predicting a positive relationship between plant diversity (and complexity) and natural enemies, which, in turn, should increase top-down control in more diverse environments. However, the “enemies” hypothesis has mostly been tested and supported in relatively simple agricultural ecosystems. Until recently, research in forests was sparse. We summarize the upcoming knowledge-base for forests and identify forest characteristics likely shaping relationships between tree diversity, natural enemies (abundance, species richness, diversity), and top-down control. We further identify possible implications for mixed species forestry and key knowledge gaps. Recent Findings: Tree diversity (almost exclusively quantified as tree species richness) does not consistently increase enemy abundance, diversity, or result in herbivore control. Tests of the “enemies” hypothesis are largely based on aboveground natural enemies (mainly generalists) and have highly variable outcomes across taxa and study systems, sometimes even finding a decrease in predator diversity with increasing tree diversity. Recurrent effects of tree species identity and composition indicate that a closer focus on tree functional and phylogenetic diversity might help to foster a mechanistic understanding of the specific circumstances under which tree diversity can promote top-down control. Summary: Our review suggests that the “enemies” hypothesis may not unambiguously apply to forests. With trees as structurally complex organisms, even low-diversity forests can maintain a high degree of habitat heterogeneity and may provide niches for many predator and parasitoid species, possibly blurring correlations between tree and natural enemy diversity. Several further factors, such as latitude, identity effects, intraguild predation, or functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity, may confound the predictions of the “enemies” hypothesis. We identify topics needing more research to fully understand under which conditions tree diversity increases natural enemy diversity and top-down control—knowledge that will be crucial for forest management.",
keywords = "Arthropod, Complexity, Herbivore, Mixed species forestry, Pest control, Predation, Top-down effects, Biology, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Michael Staab and Andreas Schuldt",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, The Author(s).",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40725-020-00123-6",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "243--259",
journal = "Current Forestry Reports",
issn = "2198-6436",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Influence of Tree Diversity on Natural Enemies—a Review of the “Enemies” Hypothesis in Forests

AU - Staab, Michael

AU - Schuldt, Andreas

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s).

PY - 2020/12/1

Y1 - 2020/12/1

N2 - Purpose of Review: Natural enemies are an important component for forest functioning. By consuming herbivores, they can be effective top-down regulators of potential pest species. Tree mixtures are generally expected to have larger predator and parasitoid populations compared to monocultures. This assumption is based on the “enemies” hypothesis, a classical ecological concept predicting a positive relationship between plant diversity (and complexity) and natural enemies, which, in turn, should increase top-down control in more diverse environments. However, the “enemies” hypothesis has mostly been tested and supported in relatively simple agricultural ecosystems. Until recently, research in forests was sparse. We summarize the upcoming knowledge-base for forests and identify forest characteristics likely shaping relationships between tree diversity, natural enemies (abundance, species richness, diversity), and top-down control. We further identify possible implications for mixed species forestry and key knowledge gaps. Recent Findings: Tree diversity (almost exclusively quantified as tree species richness) does not consistently increase enemy abundance, diversity, or result in herbivore control. Tests of the “enemies” hypothesis are largely based on aboveground natural enemies (mainly generalists) and have highly variable outcomes across taxa and study systems, sometimes even finding a decrease in predator diversity with increasing tree diversity. Recurrent effects of tree species identity and composition indicate that a closer focus on tree functional and phylogenetic diversity might help to foster a mechanistic understanding of the specific circumstances under which tree diversity can promote top-down control. Summary: Our review suggests that the “enemies” hypothesis may not unambiguously apply to forests. With trees as structurally complex organisms, even low-diversity forests can maintain a high degree of habitat heterogeneity and may provide niches for many predator and parasitoid species, possibly blurring correlations between tree and natural enemy diversity. Several further factors, such as latitude, identity effects, intraguild predation, or functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity, may confound the predictions of the “enemies” hypothesis. We identify topics needing more research to fully understand under which conditions tree diversity increases natural enemy diversity and top-down control—knowledge that will be crucial for forest management.

AB - Purpose of Review: Natural enemies are an important component for forest functioning. By consuming herbivores, they can be effective top-down regulators of potential pest species. Tree mixtures are generally expected to have larger predator and parasitoid populations compared to monocultures. This assumption is based on the “enemies” hypothesis, a classical ecological concept predicting a positive relationship between plant diversity (and complexity) and natural enemies, which, in turn, should increase top-down control in more diverse environments. However, the “enemies” hypothesis has mostly been tested and supported in relatively simple agricultural ecosystems. Until recently, research in forests was sparse. We summarize the upcoming knowledge-base for forests and identify forest characteristics likely shaping relationships between tree diversity, natural enemies (abundance, species richness, diversity), and top-down control. We further identify possible implications for mixed species forestry and key knowledge gaps. Recent Findings: Tree diversity (almost exclusively quantified as tree species richness) does not consistently increase enemy abundance, diversity, or result in herbivore control. Tests of the “enemies” hypothesis are largely based on aboveground natural enemies (mainly generalists) and have highly variable outcomes across taxa and study systems, sometimes even finding a decrease in predator diversity with increasing tree diversity. Recurrent effects of tree species identity and composition indicate that a closer focus on tree functional and phylogenetic diversity might help to foster a mechanistic understanding of the specific circumstances under which tree diversity can promote top-down control. Summary: Our review suggests that the “enemies” hypothesis may not unambiguously apply to forests. With trees as structurally complex organisms, even low-diversity forests can maintain a high degree of habitat heterogeneity and may provide niches for many predator and parasitoid species, possibly blurring correlations between tree and natural enemy diversity. Several further factors, such as latitude, identity effects, intraguild predation, or functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity, may confound the predictions of the “enemies” hypothesis. We identify topics needing more research to fully understand under which conditions tree diversity increases natural enemy diversity and top-down control—knowledge that will be crucial for forest management.

KW - Arthropod

KW - Complexity

KW - Herbivore

KW - Mixed species forestry

KW - Pest control

KW - Predation

KW - Top-down effects

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088118646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40725-020-00123-6

DO - 10.1007/s40725-020-00123-6

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85088118646

VL - 6

SP - 243

EP - 259

JO - Current Forestry Reports

JF - Current Forestry Reports

SN - 2198-6436

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Performance Saga: Interview 08
  2. Mechanisms of short-term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands
  3. Performance-Determining Variables of a Simulated Skimo Sprint Competition in Elite Junior Skimo Athletes
  4. Studies on the myth's function in Holderlin's 'Feiertagshymne'
  5. Motivation und Verhalten
  6. Positive Adolescent Career Development
  7. National ecosystem restoration pledges are mismatched with social-ecological enabling conditions
  8. Geheime Verwandtschaften
  9. Photodegradation of the UV filter ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate under ultraviolet light
  10. Die Operationalisierung von objektiver und subjektiver Statusinkonsistenz.
  11. Special issue on Responsible Management Learning:
  12. Think globally, learn locally!
  13. Can learning to move foster sustainable development? A systematic literature review examining the potential of sport and physical activity in the context of environmental and sustainability education
  14. Eine Gesellschaft des Interviews / A Society of the Interview
  15. Modulating immune responses and inflammation
  16. Sozialberichterstattung
  17. Against abstraction: Zoe Leonard's "Analogue"
  18. Participation for effective environmental governance? Evidence from Water Framework Directive implementation in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom
  19. Cybernetics
  20. Mentoring in schulischen Praxisphasen
  21. The contribution of material circularity to sustainability—Recycling and reuse of textiles
  22. Structural forces driving global integration
  23. Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention versus Public Mental Health Advice to Reduce Worry during the COVID-19 Pandemic
  24. Anaerobic Inhibition and Biodegradation of Antibiotics in ISO Test Schemes
  25. Predicting satisfaction with democracy in Germany using local economic conditions, social capital, and individual characteristics
  26. The New Media
  27. Didactics of Mathematics in Higher Education as a Scientific Discipline - Conference Proceedings
  28. To Own or to Use
  29. Reflecting on the Roles and Skill Sets of Designers and Design Researchers
  30. Walter Benjamin. Der Autor als Produzent
  31. Touching Things
  32. Tasks and Evaluation of Human Resource Departments
  33. Information Communication Technology as Creativity Support Tools?