The economic consequences of one-third co-determination in German supervisory boards

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The economic consequences of one-third co-determination in German supervisory boards. / Boneberg, Franziska.
in: Jahrbucher für Nationalokonomie und Statistik, Jahrgang 231, Nr. 3, 06.2011, S. 440-457.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{706ccbe0851f415cb2cc670a286a65e0,
title = "The economic consequences of one-third co-determination in German supervisory boards",
abstract = "In Germany, the establishment of supervisory boards and, therefore, the board-level employee representation are mandatory, depending on the legal form and size of a company. However, the empirical analysis reveals that the bigger part of the companies observed (Limited liability companies with 500 to 2000 employees active in the West-German service sector) does not satisfy the law. This fact has strong impact on research questions in the co-determination field: Many studies have tried to analyze the economic consequences of the German co-determination laws (all examining the 1976 Co-determination Act). However, as the regulations are compulsory, compelling results are difficult to obtain. The bigger part of the studies compares companies that fall into the scope of different co-determination laws. This implies that mainly big companies are contrasted to smaller ones. It is not difficult to see that a comparison of such kind entails further irregularities. The study presented allows better analysis. The data is taken from two sources: the commercial Hoppenstedt Database and official German statistics. Due to the special kind of data it is possible to compare companies of same size, same legal form, active in the same sector that only differ in the existence or non-existence of a supervisory board. Therefore, the study at hand provides more accurate evidence of the economic consequences of the German 2004 Co-determination Act.",
keywords = "Economics",
author = "Franziska Boneberg",
year = "2011",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1515/jbnst-2011-0308",
language = "English",
volume = "231",
pages = "440--457",
journal = "Jahrbucher f{\"u}r Nationalokonomie und Statistik",
issn = "0021-4027",
publisher = "Lucius & Lucius",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The economic consequences of one-third co-determination in German supervisory boards

AU - Boneberg, Franziska

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - In Germany, the establishment of supervisory boards and, therefore, the board-level employee representation are mandatory, depending on the legal form and size of a company. However, the empirical analysis reveals that the bigger part of the companies observed (Limited liability companies with 500 to 2000 employees active in the West-German service sector) does not satisfy the law. This fact has strong impact on research questions in the co-determination field: Many studies have tried to analyze the economic consequences of the German co-determination laws (all examining the 1976 Co-determination Act). However, as the regulations are compulsory, compelling results are difficult to obtain. The bigger part of the studies compares companies that fall into the scope of different co-determination laws. This implies that mainly big companies are contrasted to smaller ones. It is not difficult to see that a comparison of such kind entails further irregularities. The study presented allows better analysis. The data is taken from two sources: the commercial Hoppenstedt Database and official German statistics. Due to the special kind of data it is possible to compare companies of same size, same legal form, active in the same sector that only differ in the existence or non-existence of a supervisory board. Therefore, the study at hand provides more accurate evidence of the economic consequences of the German 2004 Co-determination Act.

AB - In Germany, the establishment of supervisory boards and, therefore, the board-level employee representation are mandatory, depending on the legal form and size of a company. However, the empirical analysis reveals that the bigger part of the companies observed (Limited liability companies with 500 to 2000 employees active in the West-German service sector) does not satisfy the law. This fact has strong impact on research questions in the co-determination field: Many studies have tried to analyze the economic consequences of the German co-determination laws (all examining the 1976 Co-determination Act). However, as the regulations are compulsory, compelling results are difficult to obtain. The bigger part of the studies compares companies that fall into the scope of different co-determination laws. This implies that mainly big companies are contrasted to smaller ones. It is not difficult to see that a comparison of such kind entails further irregularities. The study presented allows better analysis. The data is taken from two sources: the commercial Hoppenstedt Database and official German statistics. Due to the special kind of data it is possible to compare companies of same size, same legal form, active in the same sector that only differ in the existence or non-existence of a supervisory board. Therefore, the study at hand provides more accurate evidence of the economic consequences of the German 2004 Co-determination Act.

KW - Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960253378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/jbnst-2011-0308

DO - 10.1515/jbnst-2011-0308

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:79960253378

VL - 231

SP - 440

EP - 457

JO - Jahrbucher für Nationalokonomie und Statistik

JF - Jahrbucher für Nationalokonomie und Statistik

SN - 0021-4027

IS - 3

ER -

DOI