The contralateral effects of foam rolling on range of motion and muscle performance

Andreas Konrad; Masatoshi Nakamura; Konstantin Warneke; Olyvia Donti; Anna Gabriel

doi:10.1007/s00421-023-05142-2

The contralateral effects of foam rolling on range of motion and muscle performance

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung

Standard

The contralateral effects of foam rolling on range of motion and muscle performance. / Konrad, Andreas; Nakamura, Masatoshi; Warneke, Konstantin et al.
in: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Jahrgang 123, Nr. 6, 06.2023, S. 1167-1178.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung

Bibtex

@article{0e8ad82da5ea4ea2b5c4ceab5d18c43a,

title = "The contralateral effects of foam rolling on range of motion and muscle performance",

abstract = "A single bout of foam rolling (FR) can acutely increase joint range of motion (ROM) without detrimental effects on subsequent muscle performance. Similarly, long-term FR training can increase ROM, while muscle performance seems to be unaffected. Although the acute and long-term effects of FR on the treated muscle are understood, the impact of FR on the contralateral side is not well known. Therefore, this scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence on the acute and long-term effect of FR on the ipsilateral limb on ROM and muscle performance (i.e., maximum force, rate of force development, jump height) for the contralateral (non-treated) limb. Potential explanatory mechanisms are also discussed. There is evidence that a single bout of FR on the ipsilateral limb increases ROM of the contralateral limb; however, evidence is limited for long-term effects. The most likely mechanism for contralateral ROM increases is a reduced perception of pain. With regard to isolated muscle contractions, no changes in muscle performance (i.e., maximum voluntary isometric contraction, maximum voluntary dynamic contraction) were found in the contralateral limb after a single bout of FR on the ipsilateral limb. Notably, only one study reported large impairments in rate of force development of the contralateral limb following FR on the ipsilateral leg, possibly due to decreased motor unit recruitment. Furthermore, to date there are only two studies examining the long-term FR training of the ipsilateral limb on performance (i.e., maximal strength and jump performance) which reported moderate improvements. Although, trivial to very large changes on a variety of parameters were found in this study, the functional and practical relevance of our findings should be interpreted with caution.",

keywords = "Cross-education, Cross-over effect, Myofascial release, Myofascial system, Self-massage, Physical education and sports, Health sciences",

author = "Andreas Konrad and Masatoshi Nakamura and Konstantin Warneke and Olyvia Donti and Anna Gabriel",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",

year = "2023",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1007/s00421-023-05142-2",

language = "English",

volume = "123",

pages = "1167--1178",

journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",

issn = "1439-6319",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contralateral effects of foam rolling on range of motion and muscle performance

AU - Konrad, Andreas

AU - Nakamura, Masatoshi

AU - Warneke, Konstantin

AU - Donti, Olyvia

AU - Gabriel, Anna

PY - 2023/6

Y1 - 2023/6

N2 - A single bout of foam rolling (FR) can acutely increase joint range of motion (ROM) without detrimental effects on subsequent muscle performance. Similarly, long-term FR training can increase ROM, while muscle performance seems to be unaffected. Although the acute and long-term effects of FR on the treated muscle are understood, the impact of FR on the contralateral side is not well known. Therefore, this scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence on the acute and long-term effect of FR on the ipsilateral limb on ROM and muscle performance (i.e., maximum force, rate of force development, jump height) for the contralateral (non-treated) limb. Potential explanatory mechanisms are also discussed. There is evidence that a single bout of FR on the ipsilateral limb increases ROM of the contralateral limb; however, evidence is limited for long-term effects. The most likely mechanism for contralateral ROM increases is a reduced perception of pain. With regard to isolated muscle contractions, no changes in muscle performance (i.e., maximum voluntary isometric contraction, maximum voluntary dynamic contraction) were found in the contralateral limb after a single bout of FR on the ipsilateral limb. Notably, only one study reported large impairments in rate of force development of the contralateral limb following FR on the ipsilateral leg, possibly due to decreased motor unit recruitment. Furthermore, to date there are only two studies examining the long-term FR training of the ipsilateral limb on performance (i.e., maximal strength and jump performance) which reported moderate improvements. Although, trivial to very large changes on a variety of parameters were found in this study, the functional and practical relevance of our findings should be interpreted with caution.

AB - A single bout of foam rolling (FR) can acutely increase joint range of motion (ROM) without detrimental effects on subsequent muscle performance. Similarly, long-term FR training can increase ROM, while muscle performance seems to be unaffected. Although the acute and long-term effects of FR on the treated muscle are understood, the impact of FR on the contralateral side is not well known. Therefore, this scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence on the acute and long-term effect of FR on the ipsilateral limb on ROM and muscle performance (i.e., maximum force, rate of force development, jump height) for the contralateral (non-treated) limb. Potential explanatory mechanisms are also discussed. There is evidence that a single bout of FR on the ipsilateral limb increases ROM of the contralateral limb; however, evidence is limited for long-term effects. The most likely mechanism for contralateral ROM increases is a reduced perception of pain. With regard to isolated muscle contractions, no changes in muscle performance (i.e., maximum voluntary isometric contraction, maximum voluntary dynamic contraction) were found in the contralateral limb after a single bout of FR on the ipsilateral limb. Notably, only one study reported large impairments in rate of force development of the contralateral limb following FR on the ipsilateral leg, possibly due to decreased motor unit recruitment. Furthermore, to date there are only two studies examining the long-term FR training of the ipsilateral limb on performance (i.e., maximal strength and jump performance) which reported moderate improvements. Although, trivial to very large changes on a variety of parameters were found in this study, the functional and practical relevance of our findings should be interpreted with caution.

KW - Cross-education

KW - Cross-over effect

KW - Myofascial release

KW - Myofascial system

KW - Self-massage

KW - Physical education and sports

KW - Health sciences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146638637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a4470861-fd99-3306-ac4e-6dadfa51b37c/

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-023-05142-2

DO - 10.1007/s00421-023-05142-2

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 36694004

AN - SCOPUS:85146638637

VL - 123

SP - 1167

EP - 1178

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 6

ER -

In der gleichen Zeitschrift

Can isometric testing substitute for the one repetition maximum squat test?

Warneke, K., Keiner, M., Behm, D. G., Wirth, K., Kaufmann, M., Sproll, M., Konrad, A., Wallot, S. & Hillebrecht, M., 05.08.2024, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: European Journal of Applied Physiology. 10 S.