The business case for sustainability in retrospect: A Scandinavian institutionalism perspective on the role of expert conferences in shaping the emerging ‘CSR and corporate sustainability space’

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The business case for sustainability in retrospect : A Scandinavian institutionalism perspective on the role of expert conferences in shaping the emerging ‘CSR and corporate sustainability space’. / Breitbarth, Tim; Schaltegger, Stefan; Mahon, John.

in: Journal of Public Affairs, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 3, e1855, 29.08.2018.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{97c86f331c8743a689e43ed837345d9e,
title = "The business case for sustainability in retrospect: A Scandinavian institutionalism perspective on the role of expert conferences in shaping the emerging {\textquoteleft}CSR and corporate sustainability space{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "This paper is concerned with the rise and, in retrospect, successful “positioning” of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate sustainability as a management idea. It answers to calls that more research is required into the “business case for sustainability,” especially the link between rhetoric and reality. We allow for a narrative‐driven and dynamic perspective to frame the analysis of the discourse, rhetoric, and arguments in use during the emergence of “modern CSR” in Europe in the early 2000s. On the one hand, it shows that the European Union/Commission acted as an “enabler” of business case rhetoric. On the other hand, empirical evidence from two expert conferences series in Germany 2004–2008 leads to the conclusion that a wide coalition of interested parties continuously and progressively filled, shaped, and energized the early “CSR and corporate sustainability space” with presenting CSR as a rationale and progressive (management) idea.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Tim Breitbarth and Stefan Schaltegger and John Mahon",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1002/pa.1855",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Journal of Public Affairs",
issn = "1472-3891",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The business case for sustainability in retrospect

T2 - A Scandinavian institutionalism perspective on the role of expert conferences in shaping the emerging ‘CSR and corporate sustainability space’

AU - Breitbarth, Tim

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

AU - Mahon, John

PY - 2018/8/29

Y1 - 2018/8/29

N2 - This paper is concerned with the rise and, in retrospect, successful “positioning” of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate sustainability as a management idea. It answers to calls that more research is required into the “business case for sustainability,” especially the link between rhetoric and reality. We allow for a narrative‐driven and dynamic perspective to frame the analysis of the discourse, rhetoric, and arguments in use during the emergence of “modern CSR” in Europe in the early 2000s. On the one hand, it shows that the European Union/Commission acted as an “enabler” of business case rhetoric. On the other hand, empirical evidence from two expert conferences series in Germany 2004–2008 leads to the conclusion that a wide coalition of interested parties continuously and progressively filled, shaped, and energized the early “CSR and corporate sustainability space” with presenting CSR as a rationale and progressive (management) idea.

AB - This paper is concerned with the rise and, in retrospect, successful “positioning” of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate sustainability as a management idea. It answers to calls that more research is required into the “business case for sustainability,” especially the link between rhetoric and reality. We allow for a narrative‐driven and dynamic perspective to frame the analysis of the discourse, rhetoric, and arguments in use during the emergence of “modern CSR” in Europe in the early 2000s. On the one hand, it shows that the European Union/Commission acted as an “enabler” of business case rhetoric. On the other hand, empirical evidence from two expert conferences series in Germany 2004–2008 leads to the conclusion that a wide coalition of interested parties continuously and progressively filled, shaped, and energized the early “CSR and corporate sustainability space” with presenting CSR as a rationale and progressive (management) idea.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

U2 - 10.1002/pa.1855

DO - 10.1002/pa.1855

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 18

JO - Journal of Public Affairs

JF - Journal of Public Affairs

SN - 1472-3891

IS - 3

M1 - e1855

ER -

DOI