Success of collaboration for sustainable agriculture: a case study meta-analysis

Publikationen: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätze

Standard

Success of collaboration for sustainable agriculture : a case study meta-analysis. / Velten, Sarah; Jager, Nicolas W.; Newig, Jens.

in: Environment, Development and Sustainability, 05.02.2021.

Publikationen: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätze

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a608533f8afb411a94b120f5753e0bd7,
title = "Success of collaboration for sustainable agriculture: a case study meta-analysis",
abstract = "More and better collaboration between farmers and other stakeholders has repeatedly been identified as a key strategy for sustainable agriculture. However, for collaboration to actually benefit sustainable agriculture certain conditions have to be met. In this paper, we scrutinize the conditions that support or hamper the success of collaborative efforts in the context of sustainable agriculture. For this purpose, we conducted an exploratory case study meta-analysis to consolidate insights from 30 case studies on local and regional collaborative groups for a more sustainable agriculture in the EU. Through multiple regression analysis, we evaluated which factors influence the ‘success’ of such collaboratives. Thereby, we measured success through five explicit and comprehensive success criteria. We found two external, five actor-related, and five organization and management-related factors to decisively influence the different success criteria. Overall, our results highlight that collaboration success requires defining priorities as for each of the success criteria a different set of factors is decisive. Although our results showed trade-offs between the achievement of social and economic goals, it is possible to pursue some success criteria simultaneously. Furthermore, our results give reason to be optimistic about the performance of collaboratives: internal factors, which are in the hand of the collaboratives, are likely to be of greater importance than uncontrollable external conditions. Additionally, conditions encountered at the outset of a collaborative matter less than the way these conditions develop toward later stages. Thus, rather than depending on external and predefined conditions, success largely depends on the agency within the collaboratives.",
keywords = "Case survey method, Collaboratives, European Union, Farming, Local, Multiple regression, regional, Sustainable development, Sustainability sciences, Communication, Sustainability Governance",
author = "Sarah Velten and Jager, {Nicolas W.} and Jens Newig",
year = "2021",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10668-021-01261-y",
language = "English",
journal = "Environment, Development and Sustainability",
issn = "1387-585X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Success of collaboration for sustainable agriculture

T2 - Environment, Development and Sustainability

AU - Velten,Sarah

AU - Jager,Nicolas W.

AU - Newig,Jens

PY - 2021/2/5

Y1 - 2021/2/5

N2 - More and better collaboration between farmers and other stakeholders has repeatedly been identified as a key strategy for sustainable agriculture. However, for collaboration to actually benefit sustainable agriculture certain conditions have to be met. In this paper, we scrutinize the conditions that support or hamper the success of collaborative efforts in the context of sustainable agriculture. For this purpose, we conducted an exploratory case study meta-analysis to consolidate insights from 30 case studies on local and regional collaborative groups for a more sustainable agriculture in the EU. Through multiple regression analysis, we evaluated which factors influence the ‘success’ of such collaboratives. Thereby, we measured success through five explicit and comprehensive success criteria. We found two external, five actor-related, and five organization and management-related factors to decisively influence the different success criteria. Overall, our results highlight that collaboration success requires defining priorities as for each of the success criteria a different set of factors is decisive. Although our results showed trade-offs between the achievement of social and economic goals, it is possible to pursue some success criteria simultaneously. Furthermore, our results give reason to be optimistic about the performance of collaboratives: internal factors, which are in the hand of the collaboratives, are likely to be of greater importance than uncontrollable external conditions. Additionally, conditions encountered at the outset of a collaborative matter less than the way these conditions develop toward later stages. Thus, rather than depending on external and predefined conditions, success largely depends on the agency within the collaboratives.

AB - More and better collaboration between farmers and other stakeholders has repeatedly been identified as a key strategy for sustainable agriculture. However, for collaboration to actually benefit sustainable agriculture certain conditions have to be met. In this paper, we scrutinize the conditions that support or hamper the success of collaborative efforts in the context of sustainable agriculture. For this purpose, we conducted an exploratory case study meta-analysis to consolidate insights from 30 case studies on local and regional collaborative groups for a more sustainable agriculture in the EU. Through multiple regression analysis, we evaluated which factors influence the ‘success’ of such collaboratives. Thereby, we measured success through five explicit and comprehensive success criteria. We found two external, five actor-related, and five organization and management-related factors to decisively influence the different success criteria. Overall, our results highlight that collaboration success requires defining priorities as for each of the success criteria a different set of factors is decisive. Although our results showed trade-offs between the achievement of social and economic goals, it is possible to pursue some success criteria simultaneously. Furthermore, our results give reason to be optimistic about the performance of collaboratives: internal factors, which are in the hand of the collaboratives, are likely to be of greater importance than uncontrollable external conditions. Additionally, conditions encountered at the outset of a collaborative matter less than the way these conditions develop toward later stages. Thus, rather than depending on external and predefined conditions, success largely depends on the agency within the collaboratives.

KW - Case survey method

KW - Collaboratives

KW - European Union

KW - Farming

KW - Local

KW - Multiple regression

KW - regional

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - Sustainability Governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100596253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10668-021-01261-y

DO - 10.1007/s10668-021-01261-y

M3 - Journal articles

JO - Environment, Development and Sustainability

JF - Environment, Development and Sustainability

SN - 1387-585X

ER -

DOI

Beziehungsdiagramm