Statistical implications of utility weighted and equally weighted HRQL measures: an empirical study

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschung

Standard

Statistical implications of utility weighted and equally weighted HRQL measures: an empirical study. / Wilke, Caitlyn T; Pickard, A Simon; Walton, Surrey M et al.
in: Health Economics, Jahrgang 19, Nr. 1, 01.01.2010, S. 101-110.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wilke CT, Pickard AS, Walton SM, Moock J, Kohlmann T, Lee TA. Statistical implications of utility weighted and equally weighted HRQL measures: an empirical study. Health Economics. 2010 Jan 1;19(1):101-110. doi: 10.1002/hec.1467

Bibtex

@article{e7879eea0c9d48bc95835849d7427758,
title = "Statistical implications of utility weighted and equally weighted HRQL measures: an empirical study",
abstract = "The utility-based approach to health measurement, exemplified by EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index (HUI), has been challenged on a theoretical basis, but the statistical implications of such an approach have received little attention. To empirically investigate this issue, psychometric properties and statistical efficiency of the EQ-5D and HUI Mark 3 (HUI3) classifiers were compared when scored using preference weighted (WPS) and equally weighted summary scores using two longitudinal datasets (n stroke=124; n rehabilitation= 264). Test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and relative efficiency (RE) ratios (with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals) were examined. WPS had slightly lower test-retest reliability, particularly for EQ-5D (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.61 vs 0.72). For known-groups comparisons, WPS had greater inferential power for both EQ-5D and HUI3 (RE>1). No significant differences in sensitivity to change were observed for EQ-5D [0.71 (95% CI: 0.29,1.33)≤RE≤0.96(95% CI: 0.69,1.32)] or HUI3 [0.97 (95% CI: 0.89,1.03)≤RE≤1.23 (95% CI: 0.98,1.72)]. Implications of weighted scoring will depend on whether the weights are greater or less than equal weights where patients fall along the health state classifier continuum. Because utility weights can affect the statistical properties and significance of results, the summary score selected should be appropriate to the purpose of the study and population of interest.",
keywords = "Health sciences, EQ-5D, Health utilities index, Measurement, Psychometric properties, Utility",
author = "Wilke, {Caitlyn T} and Pickard, {A Simon} and Walton, {Surrey M} and Joern Moock and Thomas Kohlmann and Lee, {Todd A}",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hec.1467",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "101--110",
journal = "Health Economics",
issn = "1099-1050",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical implications of utility weighted and equally weighted HRQL measures

T2 - an empirical study

AU - Wilke, Caitlyn T

AU - Pickard, A Simon

AU - Walton, Surrey M

AU - Moock, Joern

AU - Kohlmann, Thomas

AU - Lee, Todd A

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The utility-based approach to health measurement, exemplified by EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index (HUI), has been challenged on a theoretical basis, but the statistical implications of such an approach have received little attention. To empirically investigate this issue, psychometric properties and statistical efficiency of the EQ-5D and HUI Mark 3 (HUI3) classifiers were compared when scored using preference weighted (WPS) and equally weighted summary scores using two longitudinal datasets (n stroke=124; n rehabilitation= 264). Test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and relative efficiency (RE) ratios (with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals) were examined. WPS had slightly lower test-retest reliability, particularly for EQ-5D (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.61 vs 0.72). For known-groups comparisons, WPS had greater inferential power for both EQ-5D and HUI3 (RE>1). No significant differences in sensitivity to change were observed for EQ-5D [0.71 (95% CI: 0.29,1.33)≤RE≤0.96(95% CI: 0.69,1.32)] or HUI3 [0.97 (95% CI: 0.89,1.03)≤RE≤1.23 (95% CI: 0.98,1.72)]. Implications of weighted scoring will depend on whether the weights are greater or less than equal weights where patients fall along the health state classifier continuum. Because utility weights can affect the statistical properties and significance of results, the summary score selected should be appropriate to the purpose of the study and population of interest.

AB - The utility-based approach to health measurement, exemplified by EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index (HUI), has been challenged on a theoretical basis, but the statistical implications of such an approach have received little attention. To empirically investigate this issue, psychometric properties and statistical efficiency of the EQ-5D and HUI Mark 3 (HUI3) classifiers were compared when scored using preference weighted (WPS) and equally weighted summary scores using two longitudinal datasets (n stroke=124; n rehabilitation= 264). Test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and relative efficiency (RE) ratios (with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals) were examined. WPS had slightly lower test-retest reliability, particularly for EQ-5D (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.61 vs 0.72). For known-groups comparisons, WPS had greater inferential power for both EQ-5D and HUI3 (RE>1). No significant differences in sensitivity to change were observed for EQ-5D [0.71 (95% CI: 0.29,1.33)≤RE≤0.96(95% CI: 0.69,1.32)] or HUI3 [0.97 (95% CI: 0.89,1.03)≤RE≤1.23 (95% CI: 0.98,1.72)]. Implications of weighted scoring will depend on whether the weights are greater or less than equal weights where patients fall along the health state classifier continuum. Because utility weights can affect the statistical properties and significance of results, the summary score selected should be appropriate to the purpose of the study and population of interest.

KW - Health sciences

KW - EQ-5D

KW - Health utilities index

KW - Measurement

KW - Psychometric properties

KW - Utility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049086105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hec.1467

DO - 10.1002/hec.1467

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 19248149

VL - 19

SP - 101

EP - 110

JO - Health Economics

JF - Health Economics

SN - 1099-1050

IS - 1

ER -

DOI