Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment: A systematic literature review

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment: A systematic literature review . / Silva, Samanthi Luisa; Nuzum, Anne-Katrin; Schaltegger, Stefan.
in: Journal of Cleaner Production, Jahrgang 217, 20.04.2019, S. 204-215.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{afedda3f99c241c5858585fc149f695a,
title = "Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment: A systematic literature review ",
abstract = "Various surveys reveal that many stakeholders deem current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches insufficient for their needs. In light of the large and growing number of publications, this exposes a major practice-research gap. To explore the gap between the flourishing number of publications and the disappointment of stakeholders, this paper analyzes how current literature on sustainability performance measurement and assessment addresses stakeholder expectations. Based on a systematic literature review, the paper distinguishes stakeholders and their expectations on different roles in the sustainability performance measurement and assessment process: standard setters, process enablers, information providers, impacted stakeholder, decision makers, and addressees. The analysis of individual roles reveals that stakeholder expectations are rarely specifically considered; in particular, expectations of decision makers have received little attention in the literature, so far. This paper systematically categorizes the expectations expressed in the academic literature and critically discusses current gaps. The literature review shows that stakeholder expectations have not been considered in depth, which is a possible explanation for the dissatisfaction of stakeholders with current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches. Implications for bridging the gap are drawn, including the need for empirical analyses of expectations relating to different stakeholder roles in sustainability measurement and assessment processes.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, sustainability performance, Sustainability assessment, stakeholder, Stakeholder Theory, Sustainability management, Sustainability measurement, sustainability performance, Sustainability assessment, Stakeholder, stakeholder theory, Sustainability management, Sustainability measurement",
author = "Silva, {Samanthi Luisa} and Anne-Katrin Nuzum and Stefan Schaltegger",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.203",
language = "English",
volume = "217",
pages = "204--215",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment

T2 - A systematic literature review

AU - Silva, Samanthi Luisa

AU - Nuzum, Anne-Katrin

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

PY - 2019/4/20

Y1 - 2019/4/20

N2 - Various surveys reveal that many stakeholders deem current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches insufficient for their needs. In light of the large and growing number of publications, this exposes a major practice-research gap. To explore the gap between the flourishing number of publications and the disappointment of stakeholders, this paper analyzes how current literature on sustainability performance measurement and assessment addresses stakeholder expectations. Based on a systematic literature review, the paper distinguishes stakeholders and their expectations on different roles in the sustainability performance measurement and assessment process: standard setters, process enablers, information providers, impacted stakeholder, decision makers, and addressees. The analysis of individual roles reveals that stakeholder expectations are rarely specifically considered; in particular, expectations of decision makers have received little attention in the literature, so far. This paper systematically categorizes the expectations expressed in the academic literature and critically discusses current gaps. The literature review shows that stakeholder expectations have not been considered in depth, which is a possible explanation for the dissatisfaction of stakeholders with current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches. Implications for bridging the gap are drawn, including the need for empirical analyses of expectations relating to different stakeholder roles in sustainability measurement and assessment processes.

AB - Various surveys reveal that many stakeholders deem current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches insufficient for their needs. In light of the large and growing number of publications, this exposes a major practice-research gap. To explore the gap between the flourishing number of publications and the disappointment of stakeholders, this paper analyzes how current literature on sustainability performance measurement and assessment addresses stakeholder expectations. Based on a systematic literature review, the paper distinguishes stakeholders and their expectations on different roles in the sustainability performance measurement and assessment process: standard setters, process enablers, information providers, impacted stakeholder, decision makers, and addressees. The analysis of individual roles reveals that stakeholder expectations are rarely specifically considered; in particular, expectations of decision makers have received little attention in the literature, so far. This paper systematically categorizes the expectations expressed in the academic literature and critically discusses current gaps. The literature review shows that stakeholder expectations have not been considered in depth, which is a possible explanation for the dissatisfaction of stakeholders with current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches. Implications for bridging the gap are drawn, including the need for empirical analyses of expectations relating to different stakeholder roles in sustainability measurement and assessment processes.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - sustainability performance

KW - Sustainability assessment

KW - stakeholder

KW - Stakeholder Theory

KW - Sustainability management

KW - Sustainability measurement

KW - sustainability performance

KW - Sustainability assessment

KW - Stakeholder

KW - stakeholder theory

KW - Sustainability management

KW - Sustainability measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060708952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.203

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.203

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 217

SP - 204

EP - 215

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Learning to collaborate from diverse interactions in project-based sustainability courses
  2. Broad values as the basis for understanding deliberation about protected area management
  3. Eco Threats as Security Threats and the protection of the Environment during Hostilities
  4. Multi-Agent Path Finding with Kinematic Constraints for Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems
  5. Unobtrusive Measurement of Vital Signs Through Ultra-Wideband Sensing in the Domain of AAL
  6. An Experimental Approach to the Optimization of Customer Information at the Point of Sale
  7. Klein und gesund: Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement in Kleinen und Mittleren Unternehmen
  8. Mit Flugblättern gegen Hitler, der Widerstandskreis um Hans Scholl und Alexander Schmorell
  9. Anforderungsprofile für erfolgreiches Führungsverhalten bei Unternehmenszusammenschlüssen
  10. Canopy structure influences arthropod communities within and beyond tree identity effects
  11. Earth stewardship: Shaping a sustainable future through interacting policy and norm shifts
  12. Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment
  13. Mit uns die Zukunft. Nachhaltige Transformationen brauchen andere Geschlechterverhältnisse
  14. Transdisciplinarity in social-ecological research: Constraints, challenges and opportunities
  15. The contribution of material circularity to sustainability—Recycling and reuse of textiles
  16. Qualität der Bindung von Führungskräften an die AWO - Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung
  17. Working in regional agro-food networks – Strengthening rural development through cooperation
  18. Die schriftliche Berichterstattung des Aufsichts- und Verwaltungsrats zur Internen Revision
  19. Kommentierung von Art. 116 AEUV: Behandlung bestehender wettbewerbsverzerrender Vorschriften
  20. Querschnittsstudie Erfolgsfaktoren für mitteltiefe Aquiferwärmespeicher in Norddeutschland
  21. Effectiveness of a Web-Based Cognitive Behavioural Intervention for Subthreshold Depression
  22. Ecological features facilitating spread of alien plants along Mediterranean mountain roads
  23. Instrumentenentwicklung zur Messung von Lernstrategien in mathematikhaltigen Studiengängen
  24. Red and green loops help uncover missing feedbacks in a coral reef social–ecological system
  25. Workshop: Die Fleischbranche im Wandel - Wege und Ansätze einer Nachhaltigkeitstransformation
  26. Activity–rest schedules in physically demanding work and the variation of responses with age
  27. Internet and computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression in youth
  28. Learning Rotation Sensitive Neural Network for Deformed Objects' Detection in Fisheye Images
  29. Kein Preis für Genauigkeit - Preise für Sekundärregelleistung in Deutschland diskriminierend?