Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment: A systematic literature review

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment: A systematic literature review . / Silva, Samanthi Luisa; Nuzum, Anne-Katrin; Schaltegger, Stefan.
in: Journal of Cleaner Production, Jahrgang 217, 20.04.2019, S. 204-215.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{afedda3f99c241c5858585fc149f695a,
title = "Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment: A systematic literature review ",
abstract = "Various surveys reveal that many stakeholders deem current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches insufficient for their needs. In light of the large and growing number of publications, this exposes a major practice-research gap. To explore the gap between the flourishing number of publications and the disappointment of stakeholders, this paper analyzes how current literature on sustainability performance measurement and assessment addresses stakeholder expectations. Based on a systematic literature review, the paper distinguishes stakeholders and their expectations on different roles in the sustainability performance measurement and assessment process: standard setters, process enablers, information providers, impacted stakeholder, decision makers, and addressees. The analysis of individual roles reveals that stakeholder expectations are rarely specifically considered; in particular, expectations of decision makers have received little attention in the literature, so far. This paper systematically categorizes the expectations expressed in the academic literature and critically discusses current gaps. The literature review shows that stakeholder expectations have not been considered in depth, which is a possible explanation for the dissatisfaction of stakeholders with current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches. Implications for bridging the gap are drawn, including the need for empirical analyses of expectations relating to different stakeholder roles in sustainability measurement and assessment processes.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, sustainability performance, Sustainability assessment, stakeholder, Stakeholder Theory, Sustainability management, Sustainability measurement, sustainability performance, Sustainability assessment, Stakeholder, stakeholder theory, Sustainability management, Sustainability measurement",
author = "Silva, {Samanthi Luisa} and Anne-Katrin Nuzum and Stefan Schaltegger",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.203",
language = "English",
volume = "217",
pages = "204--215",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment

T2 - A systematic literature review

AU - Silva, Samanthi Luisa

AU - Nuzum, Anne-Katrin

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

PY - 2019/4/20

Y1 - 2019/4/20

N2 - Various surveys reveal that many stakeholders deem current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches insufficient for their needs. In light of the large and growing number of publications, this exposes a major practice-research gap. To explore the gap between the flourishing number of publications and the disappointment of stakeholders, this paper analyzes how current literature on sustainability performance measurement and assessment addresses stakeholder expectations. Based on a systematic literature review, the paper distinguishes stakeholders and their expectations on different roles in the sustainability performance measurement and assessment process: standard setters, process enablers, information providers, impacted stakeholder, decision makers, and addressees. The analysis of individual roles reveals that stakeholder expectations are rarely specifically considered; in particular, expectations of decision makers have received little attention in the literature, so far. This paper systematically categorizes the expectations expressed in the academic literature and critically discusses current gaps. The literature review shows that stakeholder expectations have not been considered in depth, which is a possible explanation for the dissatisfaction of stakeholders with current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches. Implications for bridging the gap are drawn, including the need for empirical analyses of expectations relating to different stakeholder roles in sustainability measurement and assessment processes.

AB - Various surveys reveal that many stakeholders deem current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches insufficient for their needs. In light of the large and growing number of publications, this exposes a major practice-research gap. To explore the gap between the flourishing number of publications and the disappointment of stakeholders, this paper analyzes how current literature on sustainability performance measurement and assessment addresses stakeholder expectations. Based on a systematic literature review, the paper distinguishes stakeholders and their expectations on different roles in the sustainability performance measurement and assessment process: standard setters, process enablers, information providers, impacted stakeholder, decision makers, and addressees. The analysis of individual roles reveals that stakeholder expectations are rarely specifically considered; in particular, expectations of decision makers have received little attention in the literature, so far. This paper systematically categorizes the expectations expressed in the academic literature and critically discusses current gaps. The literature review shows that stakeholder expectations have not been considered in depth, which is a possible explanation for the dissatisfaction of stakeholders with current sustainability performance measurement and assessment approaches. Implications for bridging the gap are drawn, including the need for empirical analyses of expectations relating to different stakeholder roles in sustainability measurement and assessment processes.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - sustainability performance

KW - Sustainability assessment

KW - stakeholder

KW - Stakeholder Theory

KW - Sustainability management

KW - Sustainability measurement

KW - sustainability performance

KW - Sustainability assessment

KW - Stakeholder

KW - stakeholder theory

KW - Sustainability management

KW - Sustainability measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060708952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.203

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.203

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 217

SP - 204

EP - 215

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -

DOI