Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse. / Flöck, Ilka; Geluykens, Ronald.
Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. Hrsg. / Jesús Romero-Trillo. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, 2015. S. 7-37.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Flöck, I & Geluykens, R 2015, Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse. in J Romero-Trillo (Hrsg.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, S. 7-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_2

APA

Flöck, I., & Geluykens, R. (2015). Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse. In J. Romero-Trillo (Hrsg.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 (S. 7-37). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_2

Vancouver

Flöck I, Geluykens R. Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse. in Romero-Trillo J, Hrsg., Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. 2015. S. 7-37 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_2

Bibtex

@inbook{c859366c2af14d989c3a332481851521,
title = "Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse",
abstract = "This study compares directives in three different language corpora collected under different conditions: (1) spontaneous spoken data (taken from the British component of the International Corpus of English); (2) spontaneous written data (viz. business letters), and (3) elicited written data (collected through Discourse Completion Tasks). It is shown that there are significant differences between spontaneous and elicited data sets as well as between spoken and written natural data. These differences occur both in the so-called directive head act as well as in the modification strategies accompanying the head act (downgrading and upgrading), resulting in various levels of directness in the realization of directives in all three data sets. These results show the importance of quantitative comparative research not just across data collection methods, but also across discourse genres, based on corpora of authentic speech.",
keywords = "Literature studies",
author = "Ilka Fl{\"o}ck and Ronald Geluykens",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-17947-6",
pages = "7--37",
editor = "Jes{\'u}s Romero-Trillo",
booktitle = "Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics

T2 - A Quantitative Contrastive Study of Directives in Spontaneous and Elicited Discourse

AU - Flöck, Ilka

AU - Geluykens, Ronald

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study compares directives in three different language corpora collected under different conditions: (1) spontaneous spoken data (taken from the British component of the International Corpus of English); (2) spontaneous written data (viz. business letters), and (3) elicited written data (collected through Discourse Completion Tasks). It is shown that there are significant differences between spontaneous and elicited data sets as well as between spoken and written natural data. These differences occur both in the so-called directive head act as well as in the modification strategies accompanying the head act (downgrading and upgrading), resulting in various levels of directness in the realization of directives in all three data sets. These results show the importance of quantitative comparative research not just across data collection methods, but also across discourse genres, based on corpora of authentic speech.

AB - This study compares directives in three different language corpora collected under different conditions: (1) spontaneous spoken data (taken from the British component of the International Corpus of English); (2) spontaneous written data (viz. business letters), and (3) elicited written data (collected through Discourse Completion Tasks). It is shown that there are significant differences between spontaneous and elicited data sets as well as between spoken and written natural data. These differences occur both in the so-called directive head act as well as in the modification strategies accompanying the head act (downgrading and upgrading), resulting in various levels of directness in the realization of directives in all three data sets. These results show the importance of quantitative comparative research not just across data collection methods, but also across discourse genres, based on corpora of authentic speech.

KW - Literature studies

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_2

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_2

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-17947-6

SP - 7

EP - 37

BT - Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015

A2 - Romero-Trillo, Jesús

PB - Springer International Publishing AG

CY - Cham

ER -

DOI