TY - JOUR

T1 - Socio-technical transition governance and public opinion

T2 - The case of passenger transport in Finland

AU - Upham, Paul

AU - Virkamäki, Venla

AU - Kivimaa, Paula

AU - Hildén, Mikael

AU - Wadud, Zia

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - As a governance perspective, transition management views the engagement of a wide variety of stakeholders in policy development as a necessary element in furthering sustainability through enhanced social learning. Yet as a literature it has paid relatively little attention to public consultation on socio-technical change. Here we set transition management in the context of longstanding debates in science and technology studies, technology assessment and deliberative democracy. Empirically, we use national survey data on Finnish public opinion of state support for future transport options. Showing how transport practices and attitudes to transport innovation policy vary with both demography and geography, we argue that these differences have implications for policy legitimacy. We suggest that, both given and despite the practical difficulties of deliberative democracy, use of participative opinion surveying to better understand social groups with needs and interests that differ from national averages, may help to enhance policy legitimacy and hence the success of transition management.

AB - As a governance perspective, transition management views the engagement of a wide variety of stakeholders in policy development as a necessary element in furthering sustainability through enhanced social learning. Yet as a literature it has paid relatively little attention to public consultation on socio-technical change. Here we set transition management in the context of longstanding debates in science and technology studies, technology assessment and deliberative democracy. Empirically, we use national survey data on Finnish public opinion of state support for future transport options. Showing how transport practices and attitudes to transport innovation policy vary with both demography and geography, we argue that these differences have implications for policy legitimacy. We suggest that, both given and despite the practical difficulties of deliberative democracy, use of participative opinion surveying to better understand social groups with needs and interests that differ from national averages, may help to enhance policy legitimacy and hence the success of transition management.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - Digital democracy

KW - Innovation policy

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Low carbon transport

KW - Technology governance

KW - Transition management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947740322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2e1fda55-399c-3669-ad4c-2cc991e0a946/

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.024

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84947740322

VL - 46

SP - 210

EP - 219

JO - Journal of Transport Geography

JF - Journal of Transport Geography

SN - 0966-6923

ER -