Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management. / García-Llorente, Marina; Martín-López, Berta; González, José A. et al.
in: Biological Conservation, Jahrgang 141, Nr. 12, 12.2008, S. 2969-2983.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, González JA, Alcorlo P, Montes C. Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management. Biological Conservation. 2008 Dez;141(12):2969-2983. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003

Bibtex

@article{bedcd00845e74ab989fbb5993d7d1300,
title = "Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management",
abstract = "Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species. We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Do{\~n}ana social-ecological system (SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication. The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is facilitated. ",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Attitudes, Contingent valuation, Donana social-ecological system, Eradication, Non-native species, Stakeholder analysis",
author = "Marina Garc{\'i}a-Llorente and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Gonz{\'a}lez, {Jos{\'e} A.} and Paloma Alcorlo and Carlos Montes",
year = "2008",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "2969--2983",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species

T2 - Implications for management

AU - García-Llorente, Marina

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - González, José A.

AU - Alcorlo, Paloma

AU - Montes, Carlos

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species. We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Doñana social-ecological system (SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication. The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is facilitated. 

AB - Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species. We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Doñana social-ecological system (SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication. The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is facilitated. 

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Attitudes

KW - Contingent valuation

KW - Donana social-ecological system

KW - Eradication

KW - Non-native species

KW - Stakeholder analysis

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 141

SP - 2969

EP - 2983

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - 12

ER -

DOI