Secret Agents: A Psychoanalytic Critique of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
Secret Agents : A Psychoanalytic Critique of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. / Apprich, Clemens.
in: Digital Culture & Society, Jahrgang 4, Nr. 1, 27.07.2018, S. 29-44.Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Secret Agents
T2 - A Psychoanalytic Critique of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
AU - Apprich, Clemens
PY - 2018/7/27
Y1 - 2018/7/27
N2 - “Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence” (GOFAI), which was based on a symbolic information-processing model of the mind, has been superseded by neural-network models to describe and create intelligence. Rather than a symbolic representation of the world, the idea is to mimic the structure of the brain in electronic form, whereby artificial neurons draw their own connections during a self-learning process. Critiquing such a brain physiological model, the following article takes up the idea of a “psychoanalysis of things” and applies it to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This approach may help to reveal some of the hidden layers within the current A. I. debate and hints towards a central mechanism in the psycho-economy of our socio-technological world: The question of “Who speaks?”, central for the analysis of paranoia, becomes paramount at a time, when algorithms, in the form of artificial neural networks, operate more and more as secret agents.
AB - “Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence” (GOFAI), which was based on a symbolic information-processing model of the mind, has been superseded by neural-network models to describe and create intelligence. Rather than a symbolic representation of the world, the idea is to mimic the structure of the brain in electronic form, whereby artificial neurons draw their own connections during a self-learning process. Critiquing such a brain physiological model, the following article takes up the idea of a “psychoanalysis of things” and applies it to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This approach may help to reveal some of the hidden layers within the current A. I. debate and hints towards a central mechanism in the psycho-economy of our socio-technological world: The question of “Who speaks?”, central for the analysis of paranoia, becomes paramount at a time, when algorithms, in the form of artificial neural networks, operate more and more as secret agents.
KW - Digital media
KW - Media and communication studies
UR - https://www.transcript-verlag.de/media/pdf/d4/eb/be/ts4266_1.pdf#p26
U2 - 10.14361/dcs-2018-0104
DO - 10.14361/dcs-2018-0104
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 4
SP - 29
EP - 44
JO - Digital Culture & Society
JF - Digital Culture & Society
SN - 2364-2114
IS - 1
ER -