Scenes of Indifference: The Addressee of the Adventure
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Ethics and Politics, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 3, 2020, S. 87–108.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Scenes of Indifference
T2 - The Addressee of the Adventure
AU - Lagaay, Alice
AU - Rauch, Malte Fabian
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The article, born of a dialogue between two thinkers of negativity and the neuter, elaborates Agamben’s philosophy of indifference through a series of (dis)connected scenes orthematic ep-isodes. These scenes do not so much describe as perform indifference, insofar as they pursue the same themes through in-different variations. In seeking to critically articulate Agamben’s ‘ar-cheaology of the subject’ by assessing the manner in which Agamben’s thought picks up and differs from Foucault and Heidegger as well as the lesser known Salomo Friedlaender/Mynona, the text evokes a range of avenues into deactivation, inoperativity, indifference, and the event. The deliberately performativeapproach both addresses and seeks to embody the spirit of adven-ture at work in Agamben’s thinking by exploring a plane and practice of thought “below” or beyond surface assumptions of identity and position –where ways of being, forms of life, and modes of thinking and writing attune, and are acquiesced to, as necessarily open and plural. The essay seeks to show how Agamben’s attempts to render inoperative the metaphysical determina-tions of the human as subject are keyed to a specific form of address, an address that can be understood as a response to Jean-Luc Nancy’s question “who comes after the subject”?
AB - The article, born of a dialogue between two thinkers of negativity and the neuter, elaborates Agamben’s philosophy of indifference through a series of (dis)connected scenes orthematic ep-isodes. These scenes do not so much describe as perform indifference, insofar as they pursue the same themes through in-different variations. In seeking to critically articulate Agamben’s ‘ar-cheaology of the subject’ by assessing the manner in which Agamben’s thought picks up and differs from Foucault and Heidegger as well as the lesser known Salomo Friedlaender/Mynona, the text evokes a range of avenues into deactivation, inoperativity, indifference, and the event. The deliberately performativeapproach both addresses and seeks to embody the spirit of adven-ture at work in Agamben’s thinking by exploring a plane and practice of thought “below” or beyond surface assumptions of identity and position –where ways of being, forms of life, and modes of thinking and writing attune, and are acquiesced to, as necessarily open and plural. The essay seeks to show how Agamben’s attempts to render inoperative the metaphysical determina-tions of the human as subject are keyed to a specific form of address, an address that can be understood as a response to Jean-Luc Nancy’s question “who comes after the subject”?
KW - Science of art
KW - Active/Passive
KW - Aestherics of Existence
KW - Subjectivity
KW - Anthropogenesis
KW - Creative Indifference
KW - Deactivation
KW - Inoperativity
KW - Event
KW - Form of Life
KW - Freedom
KW - Ways of Being
KW - Cultural studies
U2 - 10.13137/1825-5167/31259
DO - 10.13137/1825-5167/31259
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 22
SP - 87
EP - 108
JO - Ethics and Politics
JF - Ethics and Politics
SN - 1825-5167
IS - 3
ER -