Reframing the Food–Biodiversity Challenge
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Jahrgang 32, Nr. 5, 05.2017, S. 335-345.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reframing the Food–Biodiversity Challenge
AU - Fischer, Joern
AU - Abson, David J.
AU - Bergsten, Arvid
AU - Collier, Neil
AU - Dorresteijn, Ine
AU - Hanspach, Jan
AU - Hylander, Kristoffer
AU - Schultner, Jannik
AU - Senbeta, Feyera
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - Given the serious limitations of production-oriented frameworks, we offer here a new conceptual framework for how to analyze the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We introduce four archetypes of social-ecological system states corresponding to win–win (e.g., agroecology), win–lose (e.g., intensive agriculture), lose–win (e.g., fortress conservation), and lose–lose (e.g., degraded landscapes) outcomes for food security and biodiversity conservation. Each archetype is shaped by characteristic external drivers, exhibits characteristic internal social-ecological features, and has characteristic feedbacks that maintain it. This framework shifts the emphasis from focusing on production only to considering social-ecological dynamics, and enables comparison among landscapes. Moreover, examining drivers and feedbacks facilitates the analysis of possible transitions between system states (e.g., from a lose–lose outcome to a more preferred outcome).
AB - Given the serious limitations of production-oriented frameworks, we offer here a new conceptual framework for how to analyze the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We introduce four archetypes of social-ecological system states corresponding to win–win (e.g., agroecology), win–lose (e.g., intensive agriculture), lose–win (e.g., fortress conservation), and lose–lose (e.g., degraded landscapes) outcomes for food security and biodiversity conservation. Each archetype is shaped by characteristic external drivers, exhibits characteristic internal social-ecological features, and has characteristic feedbacks that maintain it. This framework shifts the emphasis from focusing on production only to considering social-ecological dynamics, and enables comparison among landscapes. Moreover, examining drivers and feedbacks facilitates the analysis of possible transitions between system states (e.g., from a lose–lose outcome to a more preferred outcome).
KW - Ecosystems Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015610001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.009
DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.009
M3 - Scientific review articles
C2 - 28284373
AN - SCOPUS:85015610001
VL - 32
SP - 335
EP - 345
JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
SN - 0169-5347
IS - 5
ER -