Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany. / Kleemann, Janina; Schröter, Matthias; Bagstad, Kenneth J. et al.

in: Global Environmental Change, Jahrgang 61, 102051, 01.03.2020.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Kleemann, J, Schröter, M, Bagstad, KJ, Kuhlicke, C, Kastner, T, Fridman, D, Schulp, CJE, Wolff, S, Martínez-López, J, Koellner, T, Arnhold, S, Martín-López, B, Marques, A, Lopez-Hoffman, L, Liu, J, Kissinger, M, Guerra, CA & Bonn, A 2020, 'Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany', Global Environmental Change, Jg. 61, 102051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051

APA

Kleemann, J., Schröter, M., Bagstad, K. J., Kuhlicke, C., Kastner, T., Fridman, D., Schulp, C. J. E., Wolff, S., Martínez-López, J., Koellner, T., Arnhold, S., Martín-López, B., Marques, A., Lopez-Hoffman, L., Liu, J., Kissinger, M., Guerra, C. A., & Bonn, A. (2020). Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany. Global Environmental Change, 61, [102051]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051

Vancouver

Kleemann J, Schröter M, Bagstad KJ, Kuhlicke C, Kastner T, Fridman D et al. Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany. Global Environmental Change. 2020 Mär 1;61:102051. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051

Bibtex

@article{52aaea6f76c34354a806f554ec29be15,
title = "Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany",
abstract = "Despite a growing number of national-scale ecosystem service (ES) assessments, few studies consider the impacts of ES use and consumption beyond national or regional boundaries. Interregional ES flows – ecosystem services “imported” from and “exported” to other countries – are rarely analyzed and their importance for global sustainability is little known. Here, we provide a first multi-ES quantification of a nation's use of ES from abroad. We focus on ES flows that benefit the population in Germany but are supplied outside German territory. We employ a conceptual framework recently developed to systematically quantify interregional ES flows. We address four types of interregional ES flows with: (i) biophysical flows of traded goods: cocoa import for consumption; (ii) flows mediated by migratory species: migration of birds providing pest control; (iii) passive biophysical flows: flood control along transboundary watersheds; and (iv) information flows: China's giant panda loan to the Berlin Zoo. We determined that: (i) Ivory Coast and Ghana alone supply around 53% of Germany's cocoa while major negative consequences for biodiversity occurred in Cameroon and Ecuador; (ii) Africa´s humid and sub-humid climate zones are important habitats for the majority of migratory bird species that provide natural pest control services in agricultural areas in Germany; (iii) Upstream watersheds outside the country add an additional 64% flood regulation services nationally, while Germany exports 40% of flood regulation services in neighboring, downstream countries; (iv) Information flows transported by the pandas were mainly related to political aspects and - contrary to our expectations - considerably less on biological and natural aspects. We discuss the implications of these results for international resource management policy and governance.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Telecoupling, Interregional ecosystem, Quantification, Assessment, Flow, services, Sustainability Science",
author = "Janina Kleemann and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and Bagstad, {Kenneth J.} and Christian Kuhlicke and Thomas Kastner and Dor Fridman and Schulp, {Catharina J.E.} and Sarah Wolff and Javier Mart{\'i}nez-L{\'o}pez and Thomas Koellner and Sebastian Arnhold and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Alexandra Marques and Laura Lopez-Hoffman and Jianguo Liu and Meidad Kissinger and Guerra, {Carlos Antonio} and Aletta Bonn",
note = "Funding Information: This paper is a joint effort of the working group “sTeleBES - Telecoupled use of biodiversity and ecosystem services: synthesis of concepts, methods and evidence” kindly supported by sDiv, the Synthesis Centre (sDiv) of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (DFG FZT 118). We thank Volker Grescho, Jan Watzema and Jeremy Havens for assistance with the preparation of figures and data management. Christian Kuhlicke thanks Vera Hickethier. She collected the data for the information flows (giant pandas) in the context of her master studies. Support for Ken Bagstad's time was provided by the U.S. Geological Survey's Land Change Science Program. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Thomas Kastner was supported by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF), project no. ESR17-014. Laura Lopez-Hoffman acknowledges the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF) awards DEB-1118975 and DEB-1518359. Support for Liu's time was provided by US National Science Foundation and Michigan AgBioResearch. Javier Mart{\'i}nez-L{\'o}pez acknowledges the support of the Spanish Government through Mar{\'i}a de Maeztu excellence accreditation 2018-2021 (Ref. MDM-2017-0714). Sarah Wolff was supported by the European Research Council grant GLOLAND (grant no. 311819). The publication as open access was financed by the Department Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ and the Bernd-Rendel-Prize for Janina Kleemann, German Research Foundation (DFG). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
journal = "Global Environmental Change : Human and Policy Dimensions",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany

AU - Kleemann, Janina

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Bagstad, Kenneth J.

AU - Kuhlicke, Christian

AU - Kastner, Thomas

AU - Fridman, Dor

AU - Schulp, Catharina J.E.

AU - Wolff, Sarah

AU - Martínez-López, Javier

AU - Koellner, Thomas

AU - Arnhold, Sebastian

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Marques, Alexandra

AU - Lopez-Hoffman, Laura

AU - Liu, Jianguo

AU - Kissinger, Meidad

AU - Guerra, Carlos Antonio

AU - Bonn, Aletta

N1 - Funding Information: This paper is a joint effort of the working group “sTeleBES - Telecoupled use of biodiversity and ecosystem services: synthesis of concepts, methods and evidence” kindly supported by sDiv, the Synthesis Centre (sDiv) of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (DFG FZT 118). We thank Volker Grescho, Jan Watzema and Jeremy Havens for assistance with the preparation of figures and data management. Christian Kuhlicke thanks Vera Hickethier. She collected the data for the information flows (giant pandas) in the context of her master studies. Support for Ken Bagstad's time was provided by the U.S. Geological Survey's Land Change Science Program. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Thomas Kastner was supported by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF), project no. ESR17-014. Laura Lopez-Hoffman acknowledges the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF) awards DEB-1118975 and DEB-1518359. Support for Liu's time was provided by US National Science Foundation and Michigan AgBioResearch. Javier Martínez-López acknowledges the support of the Spanish Government through María de Maeztu excellence accreditation 2018-2021 (Ref. MDM-2017-0714). Sarah Wolff was supported by the European Research Council grant GLOLAND (grant no. 311819). The publication as open access was financed by the Department Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ and the Bernd-Rendel-Prize for Janina Kleemann, German Research Foundation (DFG). Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors

PY - 2020/3/1

Y1 - 2020/3/1

N2 - Despite a growing number of national-scale ecosystem service (ES) assessments, few studies consider the impacts of ES use and consumption beyond national or regional boundaries. Interregional ES flows – ecosystem services “imported” from and “exported” to other countries – are rarely analyzed and their importance for global sustainability is little known. Here, we provide a first multi-ES quantification of a nation's use of ES from abroad. We focus on ES flows that benefit the population in Germany but are supplied outside German territory. We employ a conceptual framework recently developed to systematically quantify interregional ES flows. We address four types of interregional ES flows with: (i) biophysical flows of traded goods: cocoa import for consumption; (ii) flows mediated by migratory species: migration of birds providing pest control; (iii) passive biophysical flows: flood control along transboundary watersheds; and (iv) information flows: China's giant panda loan to the Berlin Zoo. We determined that: (i) Ivory Coast and Ghana alone supply around 53% of Germany's cocoa while major negative consequences for biodiversity occurred in Cameroon and Ecuador; (ii) Africa´s humid and sub-humid climate zones are important habitats for the majority of migratory bird species that provide natural pest control services in agricultural areas in Germany; (iii) Upstream watersheds outside the country add an additional 64% flood regulation services nationally, while Germany exports 40% of flood regulation services in neighboring, downstream countries; (iv) Information flows transported by the pandas were mainly related to political aspects and - contrary to our expectations - considerably less on biological and natural aspects. We discuss the implications of these results for international resource management policy and governance.

AB - Despite a growing number of national-scale ecosystem service (ES) assessments, few studies consider the impacts of ES use and consumption beyond national or regional boundaries. Interregional ES flows – ecosystem services “imported” from and “exported” to other countries – are rarely analyzed and their importance for global sustainability is little known. Here, we provide a first multi-ES quantification of a nation's use of ES from abroad. We focus on ES flows that benefit the population in Germany but are supplied outside German territory. We employ a conceptual framework recently developed to systematically quantify interregional ES flows. We address four types of interregional ES flows with: (i) biophysical flows of traded goods: cocoa import for consumption; (ii) flows mediated by migratory species: migration of birds providing pest control; (iii) passive biophysical flows: flood control along transboundary watersheds; and (iv) information flows: China's giant panda loan to the Berlin Zoo. We determined that: (i) Ivory Coast and Ghana alone supply around 53% of Germany's cocoa while major negative consequences for biodiversity occurred in Cameroon and Ecuador; (ii) Africa´s humid and sub-humid climate zones are important habitats for the majority of migratory bird species that provide natural pest control services in agricultural areas in Germany; (iii) Upstream watersheds outside the country add an additional 64% flood regulation services nationally, while Germany exports 40% of flood regulation services in neighboring, downstream countries; (iv) Information flows transported by the pandas were mainly related to political aspects and - contrary to our expectations - considerably less on biological and natural aspects. We discuss the implications of these results for international resource management policy and governance.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Telecoupling

KW - Interregional ecosystem

KW - Quantification

KW - Assessment

KW - Flow

KW - services

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081899167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 61

JO - Global Environmental Change : Human and Policy Dimensions

JF - Global Environmental Change : Human and Policy Dimensions

SN - 0959-3780

M1 - 102051

ER -

DOI