Property rights in biodiversity for sustainability

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAbstracts in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Property rights in biodiversity for sustainability. / Stumpf, Klara Helene.
Biodiversität und Gesellschaft - Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen von Schutz und Nutzung biologischer Vielfalt: Book of Abstracts. Hrsg. / Jan Friedrich; Aurelie Halsband; Lisa Minkmar. Göttingen: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2012. S. 31.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAbstracts in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Stumpf, KH 2012, Property rights in biodiversity for sustainability. in J Friedrich, A Halsband & L Minkmar (Hrsg.), Biodiversität und Gesellschaft - Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen von Schutz und Nutzung biologischer Vielfalt: Book of Abstracts. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, S. 31, Internationale Fachtagung des Promotionsstudiengangs "Biodiversität und Gesellschaft“ 2012 , Göttingen, Deutschland, 14.11.12. https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2013-516

APA

Stumpf, K. H. (2012). Property rights in biodiversity for sustainability. In J. Friedrich, A. Halsband, & L. Minkmar (Hrsg.), Biodiversität und Gesellschaft - Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen von Schutz und Nutzung biologischer Vielfalt: Book of Abstracts (S. 31). Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2013-516

Vancouver

Stumpf KH. Property rights in biodiversity for sustainability. in Friedrich J, Halsband A, Minkmar L, Hrsg., Biodiversität und Gesellschaft - Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen von Schutz und Nutzung biologischer Vielfalt: Book of Abstracts. Göttingen: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. 2012. S. 31 doi: 10.17875/gup2013-516

Bibtex

@inbook{cfad96254fbf49b6b901c5c50c44b319,
title = "Property rights in biodiversity for sustainability",
abstract = "The vision of sustainability aims at justice in a twofold, and maybe threefold sense: intergenerational justice, intragenerational justice, and – as a matter of dispute – justice towards “nature”. Sustainability policy, as public policy in general, can be interpreted as the process of modifying institutional arrangements (Bromley 1991), that is, it is about defining the structure of property rights. To advance the normative goals of sustainability and effectively tackle problems like biodiversity loss, sustainability policy may therefore need to fundamentally rethink property rights in biodiversity.How should, accordingly, “sustainable” property rights in biodiversity be defined and designed? In this paper, I approach this question based on philosophical foundations. Following Becker, we can distinguish three levels of justificatory inquiry concerning property rights (Becker 1992: 203):1. General: Under which conditions ought we have property rights at all?2. Specific: What specific bundles of ownership rights ought to be allowed?3. Particular: Which rights shall particular individuals have with respect to particular things?In this paper, I scrutinize the justification of property rights in the context of sustainability on the first and the second level. “Sustainable” property rights in biodiversity, I argue, should be oriented towards inter- and intragenerational justice and a moral consideration of nature. A tentative answer to the question how the bundle of property rights should be designed or changed against this normative background is that diverse limitations of the bundle of rights in components of biodiversity can be justified – limitations in terms of the extent of the bundle (by excluding the right to destroy from it, for example), as well as limitations in terms of who can own the resources and how much of them can be owned by any single actor.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Stumpf, {Klara Helene}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.17875/gup2013-516",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-86395-090-3",
pages = "31",
editor = "Jan Friedrich and Aurelie Halsband and Lisa Minkmar",
booktitle = "Biodiversit{\"a}t und Gesellschaft - Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen von Schutz und Nutzung biologischer Vielfalt",
publisher = "Georg-August-Universit{\"a}t G{\"o}ttingen",
address = "Germany",
note = "Conference Biodiversity and Society 2012 : Societal Dimensions of the Conservation and Utilisation of Biological Diversity ; Conference date: 14-11-2012 Through 16-11-2012",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Property rights in biodiversity for sustainability

AU - Stumpf, Klara Helene

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The vision of sustainability aims at justice in a twofold, and maybe threefold sense: intergenerational justice, intragenerational justice, and – as a matter of dispute – justice towards “nature”. Sustainability policy, as public policy in general, can be interpreted as the process of modifying institutional arrangements (Bromley 1991), that is, it is about defining the structure of property rights. To advance the normative goals of sustainability and effectively tackle problems like biodiversity loss, sustainability policy may therefore need to fundamentally rethink property rights in biodiversity.How should, accordingly, “sustainable” property rights in biodiversity be defined and designed? In this paper, I approach this question based on philosophical foundations. Following Becker, we can distinguish three levels of justificatory inquiry concerning property rights (Becker 1992: 203):1. General: Under which conditions ought we have property rights at all?2. Specific: What specific bundles of ownership rights ought to be allowed?3. Particular: Which rights shall particular individuals have with respect to particular things?In this paper, I scrutinize the justification of property rights in the context of sustainability on the first and the second level. “Sustainable” property rights in biodiversity, I argue, should be oriented towards inter- and intragenerational justice and a moral consideration of nature. A tentative answer to the question how the bundle of property rights should be designed or changed against this normative background is that diverse limitations of the bundle of rights in components of biodiversity can be justified – limitations in terms of the extent of the bundle (by excluding the right to destroy from it, for example), as well as limitations in terms of who can own the resources and how much of them can be owned by any single actor.

AB - The vision of sustainability aims at justice in a twofold, and maybe threefold sense: intergenerational justice, intragenerational justice, and – as a matter of dispute – justice towards “nature”. Sustainability policy, as public policy in general, can be interpreted as the process of modifying institutional arrangements (Bromley 1991), that is, it is about defining the structure of property rights. To advance the normative goals of sustainability and effectively tackle problems like biodiversity loss, sustainability policy may therefore need to fundamentally rethink property rights in biodiversity.How should, accordingly, “sustainable” property rights in biodiversity be defined and designed? In this paper, I approach this question based on philosophical foundations. Following Becker, we can distinguish three levels of justificatory inquiry concerning property rights (Becker 1992: 203):1. General: Under which conditions ought we have property rights at all?2. Specific: What specific bundles of ownership rights ought to be allowed?3. Particular: Which rights shall particular individuals have with respect to particular things?In this paper, I scrutinize the justification of property rights in the context of sustainability on the first and the second level. “Sustainable” property rights in biodiversity, I argue, should be oriented towards inter- and intragenerational justice and a moral consideration of nature. A tentative answer to the question how the bundle of property rights should be designed or changed against this normative background is that diverse limitations of the bundle of rights in components of biodiversity can be justified – limitations in terms of the extent of the bundle (by excluding the right to destroy from it, for example), as well as limitations in terms of who can own the resources and how much of them can be owned by any single actor.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/32e06eea-b0a3-3f35-87b8-76bdc2ce93a8/

U2 - 10.17875/gup2013-516

DO - 10.17875/gup2013-516

M3 - Published abstract in conference proceedings

SN - 978-3-86395-090-3

SP - 31

BT - Biodiversität und Gesellschaft - Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen von Schutz und Nutzung biologischer Vielfalt

A2 - Friedrich, Jan

A2 - Halsband, Aurelie

A2 - Minkmar, Lisa

PB - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

CY - Göttingen

T2 - Conference Biodiversity and Society 2012

Y2 - 14 November 2012 through 16 November 2012

ER -

DOI