Productivity and the Product Scope of Multi-Product Firms: A Test of Feenstra-Ma
Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und Berichte › Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere
Standard
Productivity and the Product Scope of Multi-Product Firms: A Test of Feenstra-Ma. / Raff, Horst; Wagner, Joachim.
Lüneburg : University of Lüneburg, 2012. (Working Paper Series in Economics; Nr. 257).Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und Berichte › Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
T1 - Productivity and the Product Scope of Multi-Product Firms: A Test of Feenstra-Ma
AU - Raff, Horst
AU - Wagner, Joachim
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Feenstra and Ma (2008) develop a monopolistic competition model where firms choose their optimal product scope by balancing the profits from a new variety against the costs of “cannibalizing” sales of existing varieties. While more productive firms always have a higher market share, there is no monotonic relationship between firms’ productivity level and their choices of product scope. In the model having a higher market share means that firms are hurt more by the “cannibalization effect”. Therefore, the incentive to add more products weakens as productivity rises. This leads to Lemma 3 in Feenstra and Ma (2008): There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between firms’ productivities and the range of varieties they choose to produce. This empirical note takes this Lemma to the data for firms from German manufacturing industries. Empirical evidence is in line with the results from the theoretical model.
AB - Feenstra and Ma (2008) develop a monopolistic competition model where firms choose their optimal product scope by balancing the profits from a new variety against the costs of “cannibalizing” sales of existing varieties. While more productive firms always have a higher market share, there is no monotonic relationship between firms’ productivity level and their choices of product scope. In the model having a higher market share means that firms are hurt more by the “cannibalization effect”. Therefore, the incentive to add more products weakens as productivity rises. This leads to Lemma 3 in Feenstra and Ma (2008): There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between firms’ productivities and the range of varieties they choose to produce. This empirical note takes this Lemma to the data for firms from German manufacturing industries. Empirical evidence is in line with the results from the theoretical model.
KW - Economics
KW - Multi-product firms
KW - productivity
KW - optimal product scope
KW - germany
M3 - Working papers
T3 - Working Paper Series in Economics
BT - Productivity and the Product Scope of Multi-Product Firms: A Test of Feenstra-Ma
PB - University of Lüneburg
CY - Lüneburg
ER -