Productivity and the product scope of multi-product firms: a test of Feenstra-Ma

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Productivity and the product scope of multi-product firms: a test of Feenstra-Ma. / Wagner, Joachim; Raff, Horst.

in: Economics Bulletin, Jahrgang 33, Nr. 1, 2013, S. 415-419.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{bb295e003aed43fe8a6a4791f819e89e,
title = "Productivity and the product scope of multi-product firms:: a test of Feenstra-Ma",
abstract = "Feenstra and Ma (2008) develop a monopolistic competition model where firms choose their optimal product scope by balancing the profits from a new variety against the costs of {"}cannibalizing{"} sales of existing varieties. While more productive firms always have a higher market share, there is no monotonic relationship between firms' productivity level and their choices of product scope. In the model having a higher market share means that firms are hurt more by the {"}cannibalization effect{"}. Therefore, the incentive to add more products weakens as productivity rises. This leads to Lemma 3 in Feenstra and Ma (2008): There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between firms' productivities and the range of varieties they choose to produce. This empirical note takes this Lemma to the data for firms from German manufacturing industries. Empirical evidence is in line with the results from the theoretical model.",
keywords = "Economics",
author = "Joachim Wagner and Horst Raff",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "415--419",
journal = "Economics Bulletin",
issn = "1545-2921",
publisher = "University of Illinois",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Productivity and the product scope of multi-product firms:

T2 - a test of Feenstra-Ma

AU - Wagner, Joachim

AU - Raff, Horst

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Feenstra and Ma (2008) develop a monopolistic competition model where firms choose their optimal product scope by balancing the profits from a new variety against the costs of "cannibalizing" sales of existing varieties. While more productive firms always have a higher market share, there is no monotonic relationship between firms' productivity level and their choices of product scope. In the model having a higher market share means that firms are hurt more by the "cannibalization effect". Therefore, the incentive to add more products weakens as productivity rises. This leads to Lemma 3 in Feenstra and Ma (2008): There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between firms' productivities and the range of varieties they choose to produce. This empirical note takes this Lemma to the data for firms from German manufacturing industries. Empirical evidence is in line with the results from the theoretical model.

AB - Feenstra and Ma (2008) develop a monopolistic competition model where firms choose their optimal product scope by balancing the profits from a new variety against the costs of "cannibalizing" sales of existing varieties. While more productive firms always have a higher market share, there is no monotonic relationship between firms' productivity level and their choices of product scope. In the model having a higher market share means that firms are hurt more by the "cannibalization effect". Therefore, the incentive to add more products weakens as productivity rises. This leads to Lemma 3 in Feenstra and Ma (2008): There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between firms' productivities and the range of varieties they choose to produce. This empirical note takes this Lemma to the data for firms from German manufacturing industries. Empirical evidence is in line with the results from the theoretical model.

KW - Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882993849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 33

SP - 415

EP - 419

JO - Economics Bulletin

JF - Economics Bulletin

SN - 1545-2921

IS - 1

ER -