On the origins of Kierkegaard's climacus writings and paradox christology

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

On the origins of Kierkegaard's climacus writings and paradox christology. / Schreiber, Gerhard.
in: Kierkegaard Studies, Jahrgang 2017, Nr. 1, 20.12.2017, S. 313-341.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f7762aafddc6440a9eb9646212a61351,
title = "On the origins of Kierkegaard's climacus writings and paradox christology",
abstract = "By the spring of 1843, Kierkegaard's Christology had changed fundamentally: he now attributed paradoxicality to the person of Jesus Christ. This essay presents a critical reconsideration of two of the most influential attempts within Kierkegaard research-those of Hayo Gerdes and Hermann Fischer-to explain the roots and background of Kierkegaard's paradox Christology. Against these views, this essay will argue that the project undertaken in Kierkegaard's Climacus writings had a different starting-point, namely, his reading of David Friedrich Strauss' Christian Doctrine [Glaubenslehre].",
keywords = "Theology",
author = "Gerhard Schreiber",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1515/kierke-2017-0013",
language = "English",
volume = "2017",
pages = "313--341",
journal = "Kierkegaard Studies",
issn = "1430-5372",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the origins of Kierkegaard's climacus writings and paradox christology

AU - Schreiber, Gerhard

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/12/20

Y1 - 2017/12/20

N2 - By the spring of 1843, Kierkegaard's Christology had changed fundamentally: he now attributed paradoxicality to the person of Jesus Christ. This essay presents a critical reconsideration of two of the most influential attempts within Kierkegaard research-those of Hayo Gerdes and Hermann Fischer-to explain the roots and background of Kierkegaard's paradox Christology. Against these views, this essay will argue that the project undertaken in Kierkegaard's Climacus writings had a different starting-point, namely, his reading of David Friedrich Strauss' Christian Doctrine [Glaubenslehre].

AB - By the spring of 1843, Kierkegaard's Christology had changed fundamentally: he now attributed paradoxicality to the person of Jesus Christ. This essay presents a critical reconsideration of two of the most influential attempts within Kierkegaard research-those of Hayo Gerdes and Hermann Fischer-to explain the roots and background of Kierkegaard's paradox Christology. Against these views, this essay will argue that the project undertaken in Kierkegaard's Climacus writings had a different starting-point, namely, his reading of David Friedrich Strauss' Christian Doctrine [Glaubenslehre].

KW - Theology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048276368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/kierke-2017-0013

DO - 10.1515/kierke-2017-0013

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85048276368

VL - 2017

SP - 313

EP - 341

JO - Kierkegaard Studies

JF - Kierkegaard Studies

SN - 1430-5372

IS - 1

ER -

DOI