Motivations for Corporate Sustainability Management: Contrasting Survey Results and Implementation
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Jahrgang 21, Nr. 5, 09.2014, S. 272-285.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Motivations for Corporate Sustainability Management
T2 - Contrasting Survey Results and Implementation
AU - Windolph, Sarah Elena
AU - Harms, Dorli
AU - Schaltegger, Stefan
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - This paper compares empirical findings on the implementation of sustainability management with the results of earlier surveys on corporate motivations to deal with sustainability. We analyze the relevance of three different motivations, i.e. seeking corporate legitimacy, market success, and internal improvement. This is accomplished by matching these motivations with empirical findings on the engagement of functional areas. The underlying rationale is that differences in the engagement of functional areas can be expected to depend on the overall corporate motivation for sustainability management. Our analysis shows low engagement in finance and accounting, whereas the public relations department is actively engaged. Since this functional area commonly aims to legitimize corporate activities, this finding contradicts the results of earlier studies which concluded that legitimacy is not an important motivation for sustainability. We discuss reasons for these contradictions and derive implications for future research and business activities.
AB - This paper compares empirical findings on the implementation of sustainability management with the results of earlier surveys on corporate motivations to deal with sustainability. We analyze the relevance of three different motivations, i.e. seeking corporate legitimacy, market success, and internal improvement. This is accomplished by matching these motivations with empirical findings on the engagement of functional areas. The underlying rationale is that differences in the engagement of functional areas can be expected to depend on the overall corporate motivation for sustainability management. Our analysis shows low engagement in finance and accounting, whereas the public relations department is actively engaged. Since this functional area commonly aims to legitimize corporate activities, this finding contradicts the results of earlier studies which concluded that legitimacy is not an important motivation for sustainability. We discuss reasons for these contradictions and derive implications for future research and business activities.
KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
KW - corporate sustainability management
KW - functional area
KW - motivation
KW - Legitimacy
KW - market success
KW - improvement
KW - Corporate sustainability management
KW - Functional area
KW - Improvement
KW - Legitimacy
KW - Market success
KW - Motivation
KW - Entrepreneurship
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925959005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/csr.1337
DO - 10.1002/csr.1337
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 21
SP - 272
EP - 285
JO - Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
JF - Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
SN - 1535-3958
IS - 5
ER -