Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa. / Jimenez-Aceituno, Amanda; Peterson, Garry D.; Norstrom, Albert, V et al.
in: Sustainability Science, Jahrgang 15, Nr. 3, 01.05.2020, S. 729-743.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jimenez-Aceituno A, Peterson GD, Norstrom AV, Wong GY, Downing AS. Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa. Sustainability Science. 2020 Mai 1;15(3):729-743. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00746-0

Bibtex

@article{23e398ae09a74574b09b978abcfca9f1,
title = "Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa",
abstract = "The Anthropocene presents a set of interlinked sustainability challenges for humanity. The United Nations 2030 Agenda has identified 17 specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a way to confront these challenges. However, local initiatives have long been addressing issues connected to these goals in a myriad of diverse and innovative ways. We present a new approach to assess how local initiatives contribute to achieving the SDGs. We analyse how many, and how frequently, different SDGs and targets are addressed in a set of African initiatives. We consider goals and targets addressed by the same initiative as interacting between them. Then, we cluster the SDGs based on the combinations of goals and targets addressed by the initiatives and explore how SDGs differ in how local initiatives engage with them. We identify 5 main groups: SDGs addressed by broad-scope projects, SDGs addressed by specific projects, SDGs as means of implementation, cross-cutting SDGs and underrepresented SDGs. Goal 11 (sustainable cities & communities) is not clustered with any other goal. Finally, we explore the nuances of these groups and discuss the implications and relevance for the SDG framework to consider bottom-up approaches. Efforts to monitor the success on implementing the SDGs in local contexts should be reinforced and consider the different patterns initiatives follow to address the goals. Additionally, achieving the goals of the 2030 Agenda will require diversity and alignment of bottom-up and top-down approaches.",
keywords = "2030 Agenda, Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), Interactions, Bottom-up, Local initiatives, Africa, Sustainability education",
author = "Amanda Jimenez-Aceituno and Peterson, {Garry D.} and Norstrom, {Albert, V} and Wong, {Grace Y.} and Downing, {Andrea S.}",
note = "Open access funding provided by Stockholm University. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for their insightful comments and suggestions for strengthening the paper. We also would like to thank Sonja Radosavljevic for her help with the equations. This is a contribution to the Guidance for Resilience in the Anthropocene: Investments for Development (GRAID) Programme led by the Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University, and funded by the Swedish Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), and is part of the {\textquoteleft}Seeds of a Good Anthropocene{\textquoteright} Project ( https://goodanthropocenes.net/ ). ",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11625-019-00746-0",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "729--743",
journal = "Sustainability Science",
issn = "1862-4065",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa

AU - Jimenez-Aceituno, Amanda

AU - Peterson, Garry D.

AU - Norstrom, Albert, V

AU - Wong, Grace Y.

AU - Downing, Andrea S.

N1 - Open access funding provided by Stockholm University. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for their insightful comments and suggestions for strengthening the paper. We also would like to thank Sonja Radosavljevic for her help with the equations. This is a contribution to the Guidance for Resilience in the Anthropocene: Investments for Development (GRAID) Programme led by the Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University, and funded by the Swedish Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), and is part of the ‘Seeds of a Good Anthropocene’ Project ( https://goodanthropocenes.net/ ).

PY - 2020/5/1

Y1 - 2020/5/1

N2 - The Anthropocene presents a set of interlinked sustainability challenges for humanity. The United Nations 2030 Agenda has identified 17 specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a way to confront these challenges. However, local initiatives have long been addressing issues connected to these goals in a myriad of diverse and innovative ways. We present a new approach to assess how local initiatives contribute to achieving the SDGs. We analyse how many, and how frequently, different SDGs and targets are addressed in a set of African initiatives. We consider goals and targets addressed by the same initiative as interacting between them. Then, we cluster the SDGs based on the combinations of goals and targets addressed by the initiatives and explore how SDGs differ in how local initiatives engage with them. We identify 5 main groups: SDGs addressed by broad-scope projects, SDGs addressed by specific projects, SDGs as means of implementation, cross-cutting SDGs and underrepresented SDGs. Goal 11 (sustainable cities & communities) is not clustered with any other goal. Finally, we explore the nuances of these groups and discuss the implications and relevance for the SDG framework to consider bottom-up approaches. Efforts to monitor the success on implementing the SDGs in local contexts should be reinforced and consider the different patterns initiatives follow to address the goals. Additionally, achieving the goals of the 2030 Agenda will require diversity and alignment of bottom-up and top-down approaches.

AB - The Anthropocene presents a set of interlinked sustainability challenges for humanity. The United Nations 2030 Agenda has identified 17 specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a way to confront these challenges. However, local initiatives have long been addressing issues connected to these goals in a myriad of diverse and innovative ways. We present a new approach to assess how local initiatives contribute to achieving the SDGs. We analyse how many, and how frequently, different SDGs and targets are addressed in a set of African initiatives. We consider goals and targets addressed by the same initiative as interacting between them. Then, we cluster the SDGs based on the combinations of goals and targets addressed by the initiatives and explore how SDGs differ in how local initiatives engage with them. We identify 5 main groups: SDGs addressed by broad-scope projects, SDGs addressed by specific projects, SDGs as means of implementation, cross-cutting SDGs and underrepresented SDGs. Goal 11 (sustainable cities & communities) is not clustered with any other goal. Finally, we explore the nuances of these groups and discuss the implications and relevance for the SDG framework to consider bottom-up approaches. Efforts to monitor the success on implementing the SDGs in local contexts should be reinforced and consider the different patterns initiatives follow to address the goals. Additionally, achieving the goals of the 2030 Agenda will require diversity and alignment of bottom-up and top-down approaches.

KW - 2030 Agenda

KW - Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)

KW - Interactions

KW - Bottom-up

KW - Local initiatives

KW - Africa

KW - Sustainability education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074818737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11625-019-00746-0

DO - 10.1007/s11625-019-00746-0

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 15

SP - 729

EP - 743

JO - Sustainability Science

JF - Sustainability Science

SN - 1862-4065

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Joachim Heilmann

Publikationen

  1. Sozialberichterstattung
  2. Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany
  3. How are strategy maps linked to strategic and organizational change?
  4. A panel cointegrating rank test with structural breaks and cross-sectional dependence
  5. Heteroaggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with model natural colloids under environmentally relevant conditions
  6. Identifying core habitat before it's too late
  7. Mapping a sustainable future
  8. Time use research and time use data - actual topics and new frontiers
  9. Media use in Germany around the attacks in the United States
  10. Co-EM Support Vector learning
  11. Structural forces driving global integration
  12. The multi-criteria effectiveness evaluation of the robotic group based on 3D real-time vision system
  13. Recognising the role of local and Indigenous communities in managing natural resources for the greater public benefit
  14. Shrub management is the principal driver of differing population sizes between native and invasive populations of Rosa rubiginosa L
  15. Automatic or controlled: How does disbelief in free will influence cognitive functioning?
  16. Hidden in full view
  17. Sampling
  18. The promise and challenges of computer mouse trajectories in DMHIs – A feasibility study on pre-treatment dropout predictions
  19. Performativity, performance studies and digital cultures
  20. Leverage points for addressing marine and coastal pollution
  21. Rethinking Gamification
  22. Unfreiwillige Mitarbeit
  23. The informed society - Final report of SAFECOAST action 2
  24. Quantifying ecosystem services of rewetted peatlands − the MoorFutures methodologies
  25. Identification of the effective water availability from streamflows in the Zerafshan river basin, Central Asia
  26. Habitat fragmentation increases specialization of multi-trophic interactions by high species turnover
  27. Hydration and Dehydration of CaO/ Ca(OH)2
  28. Im Netz der Dinge
  29. Proceedings SMC 2016
  30. Global networks & local partnerships
  31. Resolving Incompleteness on Social Media
  32. Innovation for Sustainability
  33. Procedural Frames in Negotiations
  34. Excludable and non-excludable public inputs
  35. Hochschulen4future?!