Linking modes of research to their scientific and societal outcomes. Evidence from 81 sustainability-oriented research projects

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

Sustainability-oriented research has increasingly adopted “new” modes of research promoted under labels such as ‘post-normal science’, ‘mode 2 knowledge production’ or ‘transdisciplinarity’, aiming to address societally
relevant problems and to produce ‘socially robust’ knowledge by involving relevant scientific disciplines and non-academic actors into the research.
We present the results of a comparative quantitative analysis of 81 completed sustainability-oriented research projects, coupled with an in-depth study of six projects, to empirically investigate the assumed connections between research modes and societal and academic project outcomes. Statistical analysis suggests that contributions from practitioners in early phases of research projects positively influence certain societal and practice-relevant outcomes. By contrast, including non-academic actors and practitioner knowledge into research negatively impacts academic outputs and citations, indicating a trade-off
between academic and societal impacts. Yet projects which apply structured methods of knowledge integration score generally higher on academic outputs and citations. Moreover, the funding context affects both research mode and research outcomes. Finally, practitioner involvement negatively affects completing of PhD projects. Findings from the in-depth study reinforce a trade-off between the societal and academic impact of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary sustainability-oriented research. We find that projects which had a double research objective on academic and societal outcomes but which did not specify how to realize both, neglected either the academic or the societal impact during the research process. Moreover, we find that a well-designed
combination of disciplinary as well as inter- and transdisciplinary project phases helped projects to meet both demands.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftEnvironmental Science & Policy
Jahrgang101
Seiten (von - bis)147-155
Anzahl der Seiten9
ISSN1462-9011
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 01.11.2019

Bibliographische Notiz

Funding Information:
In this study, we combined comparative analysis of 81completed sustainability-oriented research projects (large-N study) with six in-depth case studies (in-depth study) to empirically investigate the assumed connections between research modes and societal and academic project outcomes. The sample comprises projects with a substantial social science share funded by the two major German research funding institutions. These are the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Studied projects cover a wide spectrum of research modes, ranging from basic research that is barely interdisciplinary to highly inter- and transdisciplinary projects including a variety of extra-academic actors in different project phases.

Funding Information:
The performed t-test shows with a significance level of p = 0.06 no differences in the mean of Goal_achievement between projects in the mission-oriented funding context (BMBF) and bottom-up funded projects (DFG).

Funding Information:
We would like to thank the members of our advisory group, Antonietta di Giulio, Rico Defila, Michael Pregernig, Arnim Wiek and Michael Stauffacher, for their constructive and valuable feedback in early stages of this research; the German Research Foundation for providing the funding for the research project “Modes of sustainability-related research in comparison (MONA): Modes of research and their impact on scientific and societal project outcomes” under grant numbers NE1207/4-1 to Jens Newig and LA3024/1-1 to Daniel J. Lang; staff from the German Research Foundation and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for their support in preparing the data collection; project heads, researchers and practitioners involved in the investigated sustainability-oriented research projects for providing us with project documents, as well as for participating in a survey and semi-structured interviews; our student assistants Marie Josefine Hintz, Marie Weiß, Marion Blome, Sophia Schönig, Maria Brück, Silke Bölts, Alina Langkau, Franziska Steinbrügge, Jakob Wondra and Inga Melchior for their long-term and outstanding support with regard to data collection and data editing in preparation for this article.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors

Zugehörige Projekte

  • Modi nachhaltigkeitsbezogener Forschung im Vergleich (MONA): Forschungsmodi und ihr Einfluss auf wissenschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Projekterträge - IETSR

    Projekt: Forschung

  • Modi nachhaltigkeitsbezogener Forschung im Vergleich (MONA): Forschungsmodi und ihr Einfluss auf wissenschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Projekterträge

    Projekt: Forschung

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Prospective material flow analysis of the end-of-life decommissioning
  2. Where you search is what you get
  3. Offers in English
  4. A "Whale" of a Problem
  5. Effectiveness and Moderators of an Internet-Based Mobile-Supported Stress Management Intervention as a Universal Prevention Approach
  6. The Relationship of Environmental and Economic Performance at the Firm Level
  7. AN INVESTIGATION OF LENGTH ESTIMATION SKILLS OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH MILD INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY
  8. Plant diversity effects on aboveground and belowground N pools in temperate grassland ecosystems
  9. Transformationsnarrative
  10. Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies
  11. Ready for new business models?
  12. The programme on ecosystem change and society (PECS) – a decade of deepening social-ecological research through a place-based focus
  13. Monitoring the Monitor? Selective Responses to Human Rights Transgressions
  14. From grief to hope in conservation
  15. Combating Climate Change through Organisational Innovation
  16. Putting educational knowledge of prospective teachers to the test
  17. Surveying the FAIRness of Annotation Tools: Difficult to find, difficult to reuse
  18. Handball in Angriff nehmen
  19. Personal prestige through travel? Developing and testing the personal prestige inventory in a tourism context
  20. Gestaltbarkeit aller Lebensbereiche
  21. Telomere length and environmental conditions predict stress levels but not parental investment in a long-lived seabird
  22. Towards a future conceptualization of destination resilience
  23. Spatial variation in human disturbances and their effects on forest structure and biodiversity across an Afromontane forest
  24. Environmental Noise
  25. Unberechenbare Bildung
  26. Final departure
  27. Decolonizing Otherness through a Transcultural Lens: Conclusion
  28. Prerequisites and the Success of Transformative Entrepreneurship Education
  29. Real-world Laboratories and Transformation Research