Josef mitterer and the philosopher's stone (Around His Neck)
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Constructivist Foundations, Jahrgang 8, Nr. 2, 03.2013, S. 253-258.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Josef mitterer and the philosopher's stone (Around His Neck)
AU - Dellwing, Michael
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - Context: Non-dualist philosophy is no longer novel. Arguing against the distinctions between thought and action, theory and practice, language and objects has been a staple of the debate for decades, and Josef Mitterer offers another approach to the problem. Problem: Non-dualist philosophy is beset by a problem: it is trying to argue against a separation of "ideas" from the life-world while staying exclusively on the side of ideas. It offers a philosophy seminar argument against the bread and butter of philosophy seminars. Results: The paper argues that non-dualism in practice should be represented not by philosophers but by everyday life sociologists; not by those who argue against theory and idealisms but by those who simply ignore them. Non-dualism, however, is a useful tool when theorists have to be confronted practically; this, I argue, is its value, and in this debate, non-dualism is welcome. It is, however, a value that should not be overstäted.
AB - Context: Non-dualist philosophy is no longer novel. Arguing against the distinctions between thought and action, theory and practice, language and objects has been a staple of the debate for decades, and Josef Mitterer offers another approach to the problem. Problem: Non-dualist philosophy is beset by a problem: it is trying to argue against a separation of "ideas" from the life-world while staying exclusively on the side of ideas. It offers a philosophy seminar argument against the bread and butter of philosophy seminars. Results: The paper argues that non-dualism in practice should be represented not by philosophers but by everyday life sociologists; not by those who argue against theory and idealisms but by those who simply ignore them. Non-dualism, however, is a useful tool when theorists have to be confronted practically; this, I argue, is its value, and in this debate, non-dualism is welcome. It is, however, a value that should not be overstäted.
KW - Erving Goffman
KW - Everyday life sociology
KW - Herbert Blumer
KW - Non-dualism
KW - Pragmatism
KW - Symbolic interaction
KW - Sociology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879383673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:84879383673
VL - 8
SP - 253
EP - 258
JO - Constructivist Foundations
JF - Constructivist Foundations
SN - 1782-348X
IS - 2
ER -