Islamophobia without Muslims? The "contact Hypothesis" as an Explanation for Anti-Muslim Attitudes - Eastern European Societies in a Comparative Perspective: Journal of Nationalism Memory and Language Politics

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Authors

  • Gert Pickel
  • Cemal Öztürk

Even though Muslim communities are virtually absent in most Eastern European societies new research shows that Islamophobia is more widespread in Eastern Europe than in Western Europe. The existence of 'Islamophobia without Muslims' is surprising prima facie, but in fact this empirical pattern reflects the assumption of the contact hypothesis. In a nutshell, the contact hypothesis argues that an individual's contact with members of an 'outgroup' is conducive to refute existing prejudice and stereotypes. We test the explanatory power of the contact hypothesis on both the individual and the societal level. Empirically, we draw our data from the European Social Survey (2014), which allows us to conduct a systematic comparison of Eastern and Western European societies and to account for other well-established social psychological theories of prejudice and stereotyping (e. g. Social Identity Theory, Integrated Threat Theory). Our empirical results show that people with less or no contact are more prone to Islamophobic attitudes. This pattern is characteristic for Eastern European countries as the sheer absence of Muslim communities in these societies turns out to be a relevant explanation for anti-Muslim prejudice. Eastern European citizens tend to have para-social-contacts with Muslims. In general, they rely on media and statements of (populist) politicians, to build their opinions about Muslims. Negative news coverage fueled by terrorist attacks shapes the prevailing image of all Muslims, media consumption therefore intensifies already existing anti-Muslim sentiments. As a result, Eastern European countries have been comparatively unpopular choices for migrants to settle.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftJournal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics
Jahrgang12
Ausgabenummer2
Seiten (von - bis)162-191
Anzahl der Seiten30
ISSN2570-5857
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 31.12.2018

Bibliographische Notiz

Funding Information:
The empirical part of our article focuses on one specific manifestation of Islamophobia: The support for an immigration ban for Muslims. Of course, this policy preference encompasses different phenomena such as ethnocentrism, discomfort with religious people, and anti-immigrant positions in general, but in our opinion, it represents anti-Muslim prejudice in the first instance. The seventh round of the European Social Survey (ESS 2014) incorporates a question that allows us to examine whether Europeans support a Muslim ban by asking whether Muslims from other countries should be allowed to come and live in their countries?. It is a unique opportunity to scrutinize to what extent right-wing populist and extremist parties call for a complete Muslim ban is supported by European citizens. Even if hostility toward Muslim immigration is associated with opposition to immigration in general, it is reasonable to assume that the survey question captures Islamophobic attitudes. For many Europeans, it is not immigrants in general, but Muslims who are perceived as the ‘main problem’. In contemporary Europe, political debates about Muslim immigration come along with populist rhetoric about the ‘Islamization of Europe’. On a regular basis, populist politicians blame governments for their foot-dragging vis-à-vis an alleged ‘Muslim invasion of Europe’. This rhetoric is an attempt to attract prejudiced voters and to portray themselves as the only credible guardian of ‘the people’ ().

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Gert Pickel and Cemal Öztürk, published by Sciendo.

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Eva Schuck

Publikationen

  1. Am Rande des Ereignisses
  2. Ist das Bildung?
  3. Die Moderationsmethode als Mittel zur Gestaltung von Präventions- und Kooperationsprojekten
  4. Leistungsbeurteilung
  5. Johannes Brusila, Bruce Johnson and John Richardson (2016): Memory, Space, Sound
  6. Keeping in touch
  7. Musik & Empowerment
  8. Critérios para análise de jogos e aplicativos voltados para aprendizagem de línguas
  9. Von Cloud Seeding und Albedo Enhancement
  10. § 289 c Inhalt der nichtfinanziellen Erklärung
  11. Regulierungsdichte der (Gender) Diversity-Berichterstattung.
  12. Unterstützung des Risikomanagements in Unternehmen durch Kreditinstitute
  13. Polymer-Nanofasern und metallische Nano-Drähte
  14. Additiv hergestellte Strangpresswerkzeuge
  15. Medienentwicklung und Medienpädagogik: Künstliche Intelligenz
  16. Exports, Foreign Direct Investments and Productivity: Are Services Firms different?
  17. Einführung in die allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre
  18. Adventures Erzählen Graphen (1999)
  19. Das Treasury lenkt mit
  20. Das Außergewöhnliche der Zeit
  21. Cabinet Decision-Making in Parliamentary Systems
  22. Das parlamentarische Petitionswesen
  23. No evidence for local adaptation in an invasive alien plant
  24. Einleitung Operationen, Foren, Interventionen
  25. The policy turn in German political science
  26. Präferenzbasierte Lebensqualitätsmessung
  27. §97 Erfahrungsbericht
  28. Cycling anger of regular cyclists and professional bicycle messengers in Germany
  29. Comparing Adult Mathematical Literacy with PISA students
  30. Westafrika
  31. Als Musiker unterwegs an Bord der Hansekogge
  32. Action regulation theory and career self-management
  33. § 352 Aufrechnung nach Nichterfüllung
  34. Das modernisierte Patriarchat
  35. Das Betriebsverfassungs-Reformgesetz vom Juli 2001
  36. Sind Selbständige zeit- und einkommensarm?