Is audit committee expertise connected with increased readability of integrated reports: Evidence from EU companies

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Is audit committee expertise connected with increased readability of integrated reports: Evidence from EU companies. / Velte, Patrick.
in: Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM), Jahrgang 16, Nr. 2, 20.04.2018, S. 23-41.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{23d7729687c541748d2e5168b295b31e,
title = "Is audit committee expertise connected with increased readability of integrated reports: Evidence from EU companies",
abstract = "This study contributes to the recent “managerial ability” literature and analyzes the impact of audit committees{\textquoteright} financial and sustainability expertise (i.e. combined and separately as individuals) on the readability of integrated reports. Analyses were conducted with data on a sample of European Union (EU) public interest entities (PIE) from the Examples Database of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) for the fiscal years 2014–2016 (i.e. 215 firm-year observations). Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to evaluate possible links between either financial or sustainability expertise and combined financial and sustainability expertise in audit committees and the readability of integrated reports, as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease and Gunning Fog indices. While audit committees{\textquoteright} financial and sustainability expertise has a positive impact on the readability of integrated reports, combined expertise has a stronger effect compared with either financial or sustainability expertise. This finding is in line with the idea that, to combine financial and sustainability information in integrated reports, audit committees need to have more diverse expertise. Companies, regulators and researchers could be significantly affected by the finding that managerial ability variables such as audit committee expertise can have a considerable impact on integrated reporting.",
keywords = "Management studies, audit committee, corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, financial expertise, integrated report, sustainable expertise, Gender and Diversity",
author = "Patrick Velte",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Patrick Velte, 2018.",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
day = "20",
doi = "10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.03",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "23--41",
journal = "Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM)",
issn = "1727-7051",
publisher = "LLC CPC Business Perspectives",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is audit committee expertise connected with increased readability of integrated reports

T2 - Evidence from EU companies

AU - Velte, Patrick

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Patrick Velte, 2018.

PY - 2018/4/20

Y1 - 2018/4/20

N2 - This study contributes to the recent “managerial ability” literature and analyzes the impact of audit committees’ financial and sustainability expertise (i.e. combined and separately as individuals) on the readability of integrated reports. Analyses were conducted with data on a sample of European Union (EU) public interest entities (PIE) from the Examples Database of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) for the fiscal years 2014–2016 (i.e. 215 firm-year observations). Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to evaluate possible links between either financial or sustainability expertise and combined financial and sustainability expertise in audit committees and the readability of integrated reports, as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease and Gunning Fog indices. While audit committees’ financial and sustainability expertise has a positive impact on the readability of integrated reports, combined expertise has a stronger effect compared with either financial or sustainability expertise. This finding is in line with the idea that, to combine financial and sustainability information in integrated reports, audit committees need to have more diverse expertise. Companies, regulators and researchers could be significantly affected by the finding that managerial ability variables such as audit committee expertise can have a considerable impact on integrated reporting.

AB - This study contributes to the recent “managerial ability” literature and analyzes the impact of audit committees’ financial and sustainability expertise (i.e. combined and separately as individuals) on the readability of integrated reports. Analyses were conducted with data on a sample of European Union (EU) public interest entities (PIE) from the Examples Database of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) for the fiscal years 2014–2016 (i.e. 215 firm-year observations). Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to evaluate possible links between either financial or sustainability expertise and combined financial and sustainability expertise in audit committees and the readability of integrated reports, as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease and Gunning Fog indices. While audit committees’ financial and sustainability expertise has a positive impact on the readability of integrated reports, combined expertise has a stronger effect compared with either financial or sustainability expertise. This finding is in line with the idea that, to combine financial and sustainability information in integrated reports, audit committees need to have more diverse expertise. Companies, regulators and researchers could be significantly affected by the finding that managerial ability variables such as audit committee expertise can have a considerable impact on integrated reporting.

KW - Management studies

KW - audit committee

KW - corporate governance

KW - corporate social responsibility

KW - financial expertise

KW - integrated report

KW - sustainable expertise

KW - Gender and Diversity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048085002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.03

DO - 10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.03

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 16

SP - 23

EP - 41

JO - Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM)

JF - Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM)

SN - 1727-7051

IS - 2

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Simulating the fate and release of metazachlor and its transformation products metazachlor oxalic acid and sulfonic acid in a small-scale agricultural catchment
  2. Gibt es eine Wissenschaft des Fremden ?
  3. Antineoplastic compounds in the environment
  4. Magnesium melt protection
  5. Stand der Technik und fortschrittliche Ansätze in der Entsorgung des Flowback
  6. Das Itinerar der Dinge – Objekte und ihre Ordnung
  7. Kein Schaf sein
  8. Incentive Preferences of Employees in Germany and the United States
  9. Entwicklung einer Fallstudie für die Lehre im IT-gestützten Personalmanagement
  10. „Vom ‚Kunstrichter‘ zur ‚Schwarmintelligenz‘
  11. Scattered Attacks
  12. Genetic toxicology in silico protocol
  13. Gender Equality in Academia
  14. Reduction of the Microbial Load of Digestate by the Cultivation of Galdieria sulphuraria Under Acidic Conditions
  15. Wissenschaft & Wirtschaftspraxis
  16. Ambulantisierung der Jugendhilfe - Entwicklungsmöglichkeit oder Sackgasse
  17. Aquatic photochemistry, abiotic and aerobic biodegradability of thalidomide
  18. Do salient social norms moderate mortality salience effects? A (challenging) meta-analysis of terror management studies
  19. Participation in Residential Childcare.
  20. Trade Dynamics and Trade Costs
  21. Environmental risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs and their transformation products
  22. Remote? Präsenz? Hybrid? Blended?
  23. Kontingenzprobleme sozialer Interventionen
  24. Healthy Eating and Physical Activity in Schools in Europe
  25. Der Whole-Nation Bias in der empirischen Forschung
  26. Business model or strategy
  27. Vorwort
  28. Wie klingt der Fluss?
  29. Teilnehmende Beobachtung
  30. Computerspielnutzung aus Elternsicht