Interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services through global trade in wild species

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services through global trade in wild species. / Klapper, Johanna; Schröter, Matthias.
in: Ecosystem Services, Jahrgang 50, 101316, 01.08.2021.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d731961ae8c94833993d1073a12d1562,
title = "Interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services through global trade in wild species",
abstract = "Ecosystem services flow interregionally between sending and receiving regions and their consumption can have impacts on ecosystems in distant regions. Global trade of wild species comprises a multitude of ecosystem services. We identify ecosystem service flows provided by traded species and delineate main sending and receiving regions through species range maps, based on bilateral trade entries in the database of CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) from 2014 to 2018. We found that 65% of species represent the service class {\textquoteleft}Science{\textquoteright} (1378 species), 14% {\textquoteleft}Decoration and Pets{\textquoteright} (293), 9% {\textquoteleft}Entertainment{\textquoteright} (188), 4.7% {\textquoteleft}Conservation{\textquoteright} (96), 4.6% {\textquoteleft}Education{\textquoteright} (95) and 2.7% {\textquoteleft}Medicine{\textquoteright} (54). Sending regions are predominantly located in the {\textquoteleft}global South{\textquoteright} and receiving regions in the {\textquoteleft}global North{\textquoteright}. Of the traded species 12.3% are threatened and 83.9% may become so without regulation. Of the main sending regions 24.1% are protected. Results show that main sending and main receiving regions differ depending on the ecosystem service. By linking actual trade data from CITES with different types of services, traded service-providing species can be directly assigned to service classes. Through the novel approach of identifying sending regions based on species-specific range maps, the study enables spatial analyses down to a 100x100km scale within countries and regions globally for more targeted conservation actions.",
keywords = "Conservation, Endangered species, Interregional flows, Service-providing units, Telecoupling, Trade, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Johanna Klapper and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101316",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services through global trade in wild species

AU - Klapper, Johanna

AU - Schröter, Matthias

PY - 2021/8/1

Y1 - 2021/8/1

N2 - Ecosystem services flow interregionally between sending and receiving regions and their consumption can have impacts on ecosystems in distant regions. Global trade of wild species comprises a multitude of ecosystem services. We identify ecosystem service flows provided by traded species and delineate main sending and receiving regions through species range maps, based on bilateral trade entries in the database of CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) from 2014 to 2018. We found that 65% of species represent the service class ‘Science’ (1378 species), 14% ‘Decoration and Pets’ (293), 9% ‘Entertainment’ (188), 4.7% ‘Conservation’ (96), 4.6% ‘Education’ (95) and 2.7% ‘Medicine’ (54). Sending regions are predominantly located in the ‘global South’ and receiving regions in the ‘global North’. Of the traded species 12.3% are threatened and 83.9% may become so without regulation. Of the main sending regions 24.1% are protected. Results show that main sending and main receiving regions differ depending on the ecosystem service. By linking actual trade data from CITES with different types of services, traded service-providing species can be directly assigned to service classes. Through the novel approach of identifying sending regions based on species-specific range maps, the study enables spatial analyses down to a 100x100km scale within countries and regions globally for more targeted conservation actions.

AB - Ecosystem services flow interregionally between sending and receiving regions and their consumption can have impacts on ecosystems in distant regions. Global trade of wild species comprises a multitude of ecosystem services. We identify ecosystem service flows provided by traded species and delineate main sending and receiving regions through species range maps, based on bilateral trade entries in the database of CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) from 2014 to 2018. We found that 65% of species represent the service class ‘Science’ (1378 species), 14% ‘Decoration and Pets’ (293), 9% ‘Entertainment’ (188), 4.7% ‘Conservation’ (96), 4.6% ‘Education’ (95) and 2.7% ‘Medicine’ (54). Sending regions are predominantly located in the ‘global South’ and receiving regions in the ‘global North’. Of the traded species 12.3% are threatened and 83.9% may become so without regulation. Of the main sending regions 24.1% are protected. Results show that main sending and main receiving regions differ depending on the ecosystem service. By linking actual trade data from CITES with different types of services, traded service-providing species can be directly assigned to service classes. Through the novel approach of identifying sending regions based on species-specific range maps, the study enables spatial analyses down to a 100x100km scale within countries and regions globally for more targeted conservation actions.

KW - Conservation

KW - Endangered species

KW - Interregional flows

KW - Service-providing units

KW - Telecoupling

KW - Trade

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108062356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101316

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101316

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85108062356

VL - 50

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 101316

ER -

DOI