Internet research differs from research on internet users: some methodological insights into online travel research

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschung

Standard

Internet research differs from research on internet users: some methodological insights into online travel research. / Lohmann, Martin; Schmücker, Dirk.
in: Tourism Review, Jahrgang 64, Nr. 1, 10.04.2009, S. 32-47.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8081c37cc08c48b39dcac10661d865d7,
title = "Internet research differs from research on internet users: some methodological insights into online travel research",
abstract = "Purpose – Online data collection is gaining momentum throughout the market research business. At the same time internet users and their online information and booking behaviour are becoming more and more important for the travel and tourism industry. This paper aims to investigate this issue. Design/methodology/approach The paper researches internet users' travel and information/booking behaviour through online surveys. However, this approach is prone to critical methodological limitations. One of the main issues in this respect is the question of proper definition of the universe and sampling procedures. The paper shows today's chances and limitations of sampling using listbased email invitations and online access panels. Findings Results indicate that sampling method and length of field time have a substantial influence on response rates. It can further be shown that results from online travel research differ from results obtained in facetoface interviews even when focussing on the same target group. Research implications As long as online research differs from research on internet users to such an extent, online surveys seem to be rather a good complement than a substitution for more traditional research methods. Originality/value The paper shows the limitations and chances of online travel research based on the unique comparison of data from a facetoface and online access panel surveys.",
keywords = "Business psychology, Tourism studies, Activity sampling, Internet, Internet marketing, Market research, Travel, User studies",
author = "Martin Lohmann and Dirk Schm{\"u}cker",
note = "Literaturverz. S. 46 - 47",
year = "2009",
month = apr,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1108/16605370910948849",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "32--47",
journal = "Tourism Review",
issn = "1660-5373",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internet research differs from research on internet users

T2 - some methodological insights into online travel research

AU - Lohmann, Martin

AU - Schmücker, Dirk

N1 - Literaturverz. S. 46 - 47

PY - 2009/4/10

Y1 - 2009/4/10

N2 - Purpose – Online data collection is gaining momentum throughout the market research business. At the same time internet users and their online information and booking behaviour are becoming more and more important for the travel and tourism industry. This paper aims to investigate this issue. Design/methodology/approach The paper researches internet users' travel and information/booking behaviour through online surveys. However, this approach is prone to critical methodological limitations. One of the main issues in this respect is the question of proper definition of the universe and sampling procedures. The paper shows today's chances and limitations of sampling using listbased email invitations and online access panels. Findings Results indicate that sampling method and length of field time have a substantial influence on response rates. It can further be shown that results from online travel research differ from results obtained in facetoface interviews even when focussing on the same target group. Research implications As long as online research differs from research on internet users to such an extent, online surveys seem to be rather a good complement than a substitution for more traditional research methods. Originality/value The paper shows the limitations and chances of online travel research based on the unique comparison of data from a facetoface and online access panel surveys.

AB - Purpose – Online data collection is gaining momentum throughout the market research business. At the same time internet users and their online information and booking behaviour are becoming more and more important for the travel and tourism industry. This paper aims to investigate this issue. Design/methodology/approach The paper researches internet users' travel and information/booking behaviour through online surveys. However, this approach is prone to critical methodological limitations. One of the main issues in this respect is the question of proper definition of the universe and sampling procedures. The paper shows today's chances and limitations of sampling using listbased email invitations and online access panels. Findings Results indicate that sampling method and length of field time have a substantial influence on response rates. It can further be shown that results from online travel research differ from results obtained in facetoface interviews even when focussing on the same target group. Research implications As long as online research differs from research on internet users to such an extent, online surveys seem to be rather a good complement than a substitution for more traditional research methods. Originality/value The paper shows the limitations and chances of online travel research based on the unique comparison of data from a facetoface and online access panel surveys.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Tourism studies

KW - Activity sampling

KW - Internet

KW - Internet marketing

KW - Market research

KW - Travel

KW - User studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993008487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/16605370910948849

DO - 10.1108/16605370910948849

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 64

SP - 32

EP - 47

JO - Tourism Review

JF - Tourism Review

SN - 1660-5373

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Papers from the 10th Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching 2015
  2. Generating dispatching rules for semiconductor manufacturing to minimize weighted tardiness
  3. Two Mediterranean annuals feature high within-population trait variability and respond differently to a precipitation gradient
  4. Organizational Practices for the Aging Workforce
  5. Embedded, not plugged-in
  6. A conceptual cross-disciplinary model of organizational practices for older workers
  7. The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the European Union
  8. An Advanced Double Column-Switching Technique (LC-LC) for Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Ionisation Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Fully Automated Analysis of Caspofungin
  9. Introduction: Modeling the Pacific Ocean
  10. Residual stresses in continuously reinforced composite profiles with symmetric cross sections
  11. Equivalence unbalanced-metaphor, case, and example-from Aristotle to Derrida
  12. where paintings live
  13. Creative Network Communities in the Translocal Space of Digital Networks
  14. Do You Like What You (Can't) See? The Differential Effects of Hardware and Software Upgrades on High-Tech Product Evaluations
  15. New prototype of the two-legged robot centaurob
  16. EEG frequency tagging evidence of intact social interaction recognition in adults with autism
  17. Sustainable Development Goals als Rahmenbedingung einer transformativen Berufsbildung
  18. The planar Multipole Resonance Probe
  19. Towards a global understanding of tree mortality
  20. The promise and challenges of computer mouse trajectories in DMHIs – A feasibility study on pre-treatment dropout predictions
  21. “We cannot let this happen again”
  22. Effects of Y Additions on the Microstructures and Mechanical Behaviours of as Cast Mg–xY–0.5Zr Alloys