Group-level physiological synchrony and individual-level anxiety predict positive affective behaviors during a group decision-making task

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Group-level physiological synchrony and individual-level anxiety predict positive affective behaviors during a group decision-making task. / Gordon, Ilanit; Wallot, Sebastian; Berson, Yair.

in: Psychophysiology, Jahrgang 58, Nr. 9, e13857, 09.2021.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{87f9efabd449433b843cc156f3ec839a,
title = "Group-level physiological synchrony and individual-level anxiety predict positive affective behaviors during a group decision-making task",
abstract = "Joint performance can lead to the synchronization of physiological processes among group members during a shared task. Recently, it has been shown that synchronization is indicative of subjective ratings of group processes and task performance. However, different methods have been used to quantify synchronization, and little is known about the effects of the choice of method and level of analysis (individuals, dyads, or triads) on the results. In this study, participants performed a decision-making task in groups of three while physiological signals (heart rate and electrodermal activity), positive affective behavior, and personality traits were measured. First, we investigated the effects of different levels of analysis of physiological synchrony on affective behavior. We computed synchrony measures as (a) individual contributions to group synchrony, (b) the average dyadic synchrony within a group, and (c) group-level synchrony. Second, we assessed the association between physiological synchrony and positive affective behavior. Third, we investigated the moderating effects of trait anxiety and social phobia on behavior. We discovered that the effects of physiological synchrony on positive affective behavior were particularly strong at the group level but nonsignificant at the individual and dyadic levels. Moreover, we found that heart rate and electrodermal synchronization showed opposite effects on group members' display of affective behavior. Finally, trait anxiety moderated the relationship between physiological synchrony and affective behavior, perhaps due to social uncertainty, while social phobia did not have a moderating effect. We discuss these results regarding the role of different physiological signals and task demands during joint action.",
keywords = "electrodermal activity, group interactions, heart rate, interpersonal synchrony, multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis, physiological synchrony, Psychology",
author = "Ilanit Gordon and Sebastian Wallot and Yair Berson",
note = "Ilanit Gordon acknowledges funding from the Israel Science Foundation [grant numbers 2096/15, 1726/15] and funding provided by Negotiation and Team Resources under the NTR-INGroup research grant program. Sebastian Wallot acknowledges funding from the Heisenberg programme of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG), grant number 442405852",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1111/psyp.13857",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
journal = "Psychophysiology",
issn = "0048-5772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group-level physiological synchrony and individual-level anxiety predict positive affective behaviors during a group decision-making task

AU - Gordon, Ilanit

AU - Wallot, Sebastian

AU - Berson, Yair

N1 - Ilanit Gordon acknowledges funding from the Israel Science Foundation [grant numbers 2096/15, 1726/15] and funding provided by Negotiation and Team Resources under the NTR-INGroup research grant program. Sebastian Wallot acknowledges funding from the Heisenberg programme of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG), grant number 442405852

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Joint performance can lead to the synchronization of physiological processes among group members during a shared task. Recently, it has been shown that synchronization is indicative of subjective ratings of group processes and task performance. However, different methods have been used to quantify synchronization, and little is known about the effects of the choice of method and level of analysis (individuals, dyads, or triads) on the results. In this study, participants performed a decision-making task in groups of three while physiological signals (heart rate and electrodermal activity), positive affective behavior, and personality traits were measured. First, we investigated the effects of different levels of analysis of physiological synchrony on affective behavior. We computed synchrony measures as (a) individual contributions to group synchrony, (b) the average dyadic synchrony within a group, and (c) group-level synchrony. Second, we assessed the association between physiological synchrony and positive affective behavior. Third, we investigated the moderating effects of trait anxiety and social phobia on behavior. We discovered that the effects of physiological synchrony on positive affective behavior were particularly strong at the group level but nonsignificant at the individual and dyadic levels. Moreover, we found that heart rate and electrodermal synchronization showed opposite effects on group members' display of affective behavior. Finally, trait anxiety moderated the relationship between physiological synchrony and affective behavior, perhaps due to social uncertainty, while social phobia did not have a moderating effect. We discuss these results regarding the role of different physiological signals and task demands during joint action.

AB - Joint performance can lead to the synchronization of physiological processes among group members during a shared task. Recently, it has been shown that synchronization is indicative of subjective ratings of group processes and task performance. However, different methods have been used to quantify synchronization, and little is known about the effects of the choice of method and level of analysis (individuals, dyads, or triads) on the results. In this study, participants performed a decision-making task in groups of three while physiological signals (heart rate and electrodermal activity), positive affective behavior, and personality traits were measured. First, we investigated the effects of different levels of analysis of physiological synchrony on affective behavior. We computed synchrony measures as (a) individual contributions to group synchrony, (b) the average dyadic synchrony within a group, and (c) group-level synchrony. Second, we assessed the association between physiological synchrony and positive affective behavior. Third, we investigated the moderating effects of trait anxiety and social phobia on behavior. We discovered that the effects of physiological synchrony on positive affective behavior were particularly strong at the group level but nonsignificant at the individual and dyadic levels. Moreover, we found that heart rate and electrodermal synchronization showed opposite effects on group members' display of affective behavior. Finally, trait anxiety moderated the relationship between physiological synchrony and affective behavior, perhaps due to social uncertainty, while social phobia did not have a moderating effect. We discuss these results regarding the role of different physiological signals and task demands during joint action.

KW - electrodermal activity

KW - group interactions

KW - heart rate

KW - interpersonal synchrony

KW - multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis

KW - physiological synchrony

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107346323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/psyp.13857

DO - 10.1111/psyp.13857

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 34096065

AN - SCOPUS:85107346323

VL - 58

JO - Psychophysiology

JF - Psychophysiology

SN - 0048-5772

IS - 9

M1 - e13857

ER -

DOI