TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance and legitimacy aspects of the UK biofuel carbon and sustainability reporting system

AU - Upham, Paul

AU - Tomei, Julia

AU - Dendler, Leonie

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Biofuel policy has become highly contentious in Europe. In this paper we discuss the governance and legitimacy aspects of the carbon and sustainability system of the UK Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO), both before and after implementation of the Renewable Energy Directive. RTFO certification is of a meta-type, being built upon existing certification and labelling schemes, each of which are more or less contested by NGOs. Despite the RTFO being based on these non-state initiatives, so far the concerns of environment and development NGOs and others have not been given serious expression in regulatory terms. Indeed, biofuel policy development in the UK has arguably been unduly non-responsive to critical opinion, given the limited scientific base on biofuel impacts and the reliance of RTFO sustainability certification on non-state actors and schemes. Drawing on documentary evidence, interviews and three sets of literatures - co-production of regulation; post-normal science; and legitimacy of non-state certification and labelling processes - we suggest that until concerned voices are given a stronger expression in UK and EC biofuel policy development, the policy cannot yet be said to have achieved a wide social mandate.

AB - Biofuel policy has become highly contentious in Europe. In this paper we discuss the governance and legitimacy aspects of the carbon and sustainability system of the UK Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO), both before and after implementation of the Renewable Energy Directive. RTFO certification is of a meta-type, being built upon existing certification and labelling schemes, each of which are more or less contested by NGOs. Despite the RTFO being based on these non-state initiatives, so far the concerns of environment and development NGOs and others have not been given serious expression in regulatory terms. Indeed, biofuel policy development in the UK has arguably been unduly non-responsive to critical opinion, given the limited scientific base on biofuel impacts and the reliance of RTFO sustainability certification on non-state actors and schemes. Drawing on documentary evidence, interviews and three sets of literatures - co-production of regulation; post-normal science; and legitimacy of non-state certification and labelling processes - we suggest that until concerned voices are given a stronger expression in UK and EC biofuel policy development, the policy cannot yet be said to have achieved a wide social mandate.

KW - Biofuels

KW - Governance

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953306414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7f3ed520-3cbb-378b-9c0d-6b6d28758640/

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.036

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.036

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:79953306414

VL - 39

SP - 2669

EP - 2678

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 5

ER -