Feel good, stay green: Positive affect promotes pro-environmental behaviors and mitigates compensatory “mental bookkeeping” effects

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Feel good, stay green: Positive affect promotes pro-environmental behaviors and mitigates compensatory “mental bookkeeping” effects. / Chatelain, Gilles; Hille, Stefanie Lena; Sander, David et al.
in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, Jahrgang 56, 04.2018, S. 3-11.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chatelain G, Hille SL, Sander D, Patel M, Hahnel UJJ, Brosch T. Feel good, stay green: Positive affect promotes pro-environmental behaviors and mitigates compensatory “mental bookkeeping” effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2018 Apr;56:3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.002

Bibtex

@article{e479a004fb4f4483ba23a2d773b427e8,
title = "Feel good, stay green: Positive affect promotes pro-environmental behaviors and mitigates compensatory “mental bookkeeping” effects",
abstract = "To counteract climate change people should adopt lifestyles consisting of numerous pro-environmental actions, across different domains, sustained over long time periods. Thus, it is important to understand how initial pro-environmental behaviors can impact the likelihood of subsequent behaviors. We tested the hypothesis that people use mental bookkeeping of past behaviors, allowing them to limit pro-environmental behaviors after having performed similar ones, and investigated the role of affect in this context. Participants read campaign messages framed affectively neutral (Experiment 1) or positive/negative (Experiment 2), followed by fictitious scenarios in which they could perform a second pro-environmental behavior after having shown a first one. Participants indicated a smaller willingness to act pro-environmentally if the behaviors were similar. Positive affect increased the likelihood of showing subsequent behaviors and mitigated negative spillover driven by behavioral similarity. However, the observed effect sizes are too small to be of practical relevance for developing efficient intervention strategies.",
keywords = "Affect, Mental bookkeeping, Pro-environmental behavior, Spillover, Psychology, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Gilles Chatelain and Hille, {Stefanie Lena} and David Sander and Martin Patel and Hahnel, {Ulf Joachim Jonas} and Tobias Brosch",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.002",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "3--11",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Psychology",
issn = "0272-4944",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feel good, stay green

T2 - Positive affect promotes pro-environmental behaviors and mitigates compensatory “mental bookkeeping” effects

AU - Chatelain, Gilles

AU - Hille, Stefanie Lena

AU - Sander, David

AU - Patel, Martin

AU - Hahnel, Ulf Joachim Jonas

AU - Brosch, Tobias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - To counteract climate change people should adopt lifestyles consisting of numerous pro-environmental actions, across different domains, sustained over long time periods. Thus, it is important to understand how initial pro-environmental behaviors can impact the likelihood of subsequent behaviors. We tested the hypothesis that people use mental bookkeeping of past behaviors, allowing them to limit pro-environmental behaviors after having performed similar ones, and investigated the role of affect in this context. Participants read campaign messages framed affectively neutral (Experiment 1) or positive/negative (Experiment 2), followed by fictitious scenarios in which they could perform a second pro-environmental behavior after having shown a first one. Participants indicated a smaller willingness to act pro-environmentally if the behaviors were similar. Positive affect increased the likelihood of showing subsequent behaviors and mitigated negative spillover driven by behavioral similarity. However, the observed effect sizes are too small to be of practical relevance for developing efficient intervention strategies.

AB - To counteract climate change people should adopt lifestyles consisting of numerous pro-environmental actions, across different domains, sustained over long time periods. Thus, it is important to understand how initial pro-environmental behaviors can impact the likelihood of subsequent behaviors. We tested the hypothesis that people use mental bookkeeping of past behaviors, allowing them to limit pro-environmental behaviors after having performed similar ones, and investigated the role of affect in this context. Participants read campaign messages framed affectively neutral (Experiment 1) or positive/negative (Experiment 2), followed by fictitious scenarios in which they could perform a second pro-environmental behavior after having shown a first one. Participants indicated a smaller willingness to act pro-environmentally if the behaviors were similar. Positive affect increased the likelihood of showing subsequent behaviors and mitigated negative spillover driven by behavioral similarity. However, the observed effect sizes are too small to be of practical relevance for developing efficient intervention strategies.

KW - Affect

KW - Mental bookkeeping

KW - Pro-environmental behavior

KW - Spillover

KW - Psychology

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041824610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.002

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85041824610

VL - 56

SP - 3

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Environmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Environmental Psychology

SN - 0272-4944

ER -

DOI