Exploring the “works with nature” pillar of food sovereignty: a review of empirical cases in academic literature
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, Jahrgang 48, Nr. 3, 2024, S. 332-356.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the “works with nature” pillar of food sovereignty
T2 - a review of empirical cases in academic literature
AU - Benavides-Frias, Camila
AU - Ortiz Przychodzka, Stefan
AU - Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel
AU - Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
AU - Burke, Leonie
AU - Hanspach, Jan
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Food Sovereignty (FS) is growing in popularity in food-nature academic discussions. This systematic review depicts 1) the level of engagement and 2) the topics related to the “Works with Nature” pillar (WwNP) of food sovereignty present in the academic literature. Most articles engaged with this pillar. Common topics included ecological agriculture practices, rejecting intensive-industrial agriculture and exploring how human-nature values and traditional ecological knowledge are affected. An in-depth engagement with ecological conditions (e.g. biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and resilience) was less prominent. We conclude that a broader variety of topics could be explored to support politically engaged research on the systemic nature of food purported by a paradigm born from grassroots movements.
AB - Food Sovereignty (FS) is growing in popularity in food-nature academic discussions. This systematic review depicts 1) the level of engagement and 2) the topics related to the “Works with Nature” pillar (WwNP) of food sovereignty present in the academic literature. Most articles engaged with this pillar. Common topics included ecological agriculture practices, rejecting intensive-industrial agriculture and exploring how human-nature values and traditional ecological knowledge are affected. An in-depth engagement with ecological conditions (e.g. biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and resilience) was less prominent. We conclude that a broader variety of topics could be explored to support politically engaged research on the systemic nature of food purported by a paradigm born from grassroots movements.
KW - Agroecology
KW - biodiversity conservation
KW - ecosystem functions
KW - human–nature relationships
KW - systemic approaches
KW - traditional ecological knowledge
KW - values of nature
KW - Ecosystems Research
KW - Environmental planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178448824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/72d1e767-0ee3-3f6e-b5e4-05c0e62182b7/
U2 - 10.1080/21683565.2023.2288318
DO - 10.1080/21683565.2023.2288318
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:85178448824
VL - 48
SP - 332
EP - 356
JO - Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
JF - Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
SN - 2168-3565
IS - 3
ER -