Explaining Disagreement on Interest Rates in a Taylor-Rule Setting

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Explaining Disagreement on Interest Rates in a Taylor-Rule Setting. / Dräger, Lena; Lamla, Michael J.
in: The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Jahrgang 119, Nr. 4, 10.2017, S. 987-1009.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a13d1adfd7d14f5b8d89db62d953b4f4,
title = "Explaining Disagreement on Interest Rates in a Taylor-Rule Setting",
abstract = "Most studies on disagreement focus on one specific variable, thereby neglecting the fact that disagreement can be co‐moving with disagreement on other variables. In this paper, we explore to what extent disagreement regarding the interest rate is driven by disagreement on inflation and unemployment. This relationship can be motivated by the theoretical concept of the Taylor rule. Using survey microdata for both professional forecasters and consumers, we provide evidence that disagreement on the interest rate is mainly driven by disagreement on inflation. We further show that disagreement is significantly influenced by central bank transparency, as well as news on money and credit conditions.",
keywords = "Economics, Inflation expectations, interest-rate expectations, survey microdata, taylor rule, unemployment expectations",
author = "Lena Dr{\"a}ger and Lamla, {Michael J}",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/sjoe.12217",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "987--1009",
journal = "The Scandinavian Journal of Economics",
issn = "0347-0520",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining Disagreement on Interest Rates in a Taylor-Rule Setting

AU - Dräger, Lena

AU - Lamla, Michael J

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Most studies on disagreement focus on one specific variable, thereby neglecting the fact that disagreement can be co‐moving with disagreement on other variables. In this paper, we explore to what extent disagreement regarding the interest rate is driven by disagreement on inflation and unemployment. This relationship can be motivated by the theoretical concept of the Taylor rule. Using survey microdata for both professional forecasters and consumers, we provide evidence that disagreement on the interest rate is mainly driven by disagreement on inflation. We further show that disagreement is significantly influenced by central bank transparency, as well as news on money and credit conditions.

AB - Most studies on disagreement focus on one specific variable, thereby neglecting the fact that disagreement can be co‐moving with disagreement on other variables. In this paper, we explore to what extent disagreement regarding the interest rate is driven by disagreement on inflation and unemployment. This relationship can be motivated by the theoretical concept of the Taylor rule. Using survey microdata for both professional forecasters and consumers, we provide evidence that disagreement on the interest rate is mainly driven by disagreement on inflation. We further show that disagreement is significantly influenced by central bank transparency, as well as news on money and credit conditions.

KW - Economics

KW - Inflation expectations

KW - interest-rate expectations

KW - survey microdata

KW - taylor rule

KW - unemployment expectations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032513984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/sjoe.12217

DO - 10.1111/sjoe.12217

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 119

SP - 987

EP - 1009

JO - The Scandinavian Journal of Economics

JF - The Scandinavian Journal of Economics

SN - 0347-0520

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Jannis Dethmann

Publikationen

  1. A Unified Contextual Bandit Framework for Long- and Short-Term Recommendations
  2. Using work values to predict post-retirement work intentions
  3. The Influence of Counterfactual Thinking about Uncontrolled Factors on Moral Judgment
  4. Functionality or Aesthetics?
  5. Locus of control
  6. Green your community click by click
  7. Friedenspraxis
  8. Learning Analytics and Personalized Learning
  9. Doing everything you can, but not (yet) getting it right
  10. Analysing clickstream data
  11. Credit constraints, idiosyncratic risks, and the wealth ditribution in a heterogeneous agent model
  12. Introduction to General Ecology
  13. Crossing borders
  14. Performability analysis of an unreliable M/M/1-type queue
  15. Introduction: Queer Theory after "Marriage Equality"
  16. Variation in short-term and long-term responses of photosynthesis and isoprenoid-mediated photoprotection to soil water availability in four Douglas-fir provenances
  17. Methoden-Muster: Partizipation und Verhandlung
  18. Introduction: From Dada Tricks to Post-Truth Politics
  19. From the plurality of transdisciplinarity to concrete transdisciplinary methods
  20. Formative Assessment in Mathematics Instruction
  21. Diagnosebegleiter - Einzeltestkartei
  22. Feature selection for density level-sets
  23. Self-regulated learning and self assessment in online mathematics bridging courses
  24. Silent reading fluency and comprehension in bilingual children
  25. Notting Hill Gate 4 Basic
  26. Mythos "Stunde Null"
  27. Ereignis
  28. [U]topische Körper in der Adoleszenz
  29. Musical Interface Agendas. Musical Appropriation via Technological Pre-configuration
  30. Boosting and sustaining passion
  31. Frank Fischer/Herbert Gottweis (Hg.) The Argumentative Turn Revisited.
  32. Vorräte - Schätzung des Fertigstellungsgrades bei der Percentage of Completion Methode
  33. The Return of History - An Exchange between Christoph Behnke, Cornelia Kastelan, and Ulf Wuggenig
  34. Hydration and Dehydration of CaO/ Ca(OH)2 and CaCl2 / CaCl2 * 6 H2O– TGA/ DSC studies
  35. Structure matters
  36. Influence of strontium, silicon and calcium additions on the properties of the AM50 alloy
  37. Frontiers of Democracy (Special Issue)
  38. Evaluierung medizinischer Volumenrendering-Algorithmen durch empirische Studien
  39. Peer Evaluation Can Reliably Measure Local Knowledge
  40. 303, MPC, A/D
  41. Comparing U.S. and German Cost Accounting Methods
  42. Social movements in defense of public water services