Ewigkeitsauffassungen. Die Aporien der exemplarischen Verhältnisbestimmungen von Zeit und Ewigkeit bei Augustin, Boethius und Swinburne und trinitarische Lösungswege
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
Ewigkeitsauffassungen. Die Aporien der exemplarischen Verhältnisbestimmungen von Zeit und Ewigkeit bei Augustin, Boethius und Swinburne und trinitarische Lösungswege. / Mühling, Markus.
in: Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, Jahrgang 47, Nr. 2, 11.2005, S. 154-172.Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ewigkeitsauffassungen. Die Aporien der exemplarischen Verhältnisbestimmungen von Zeit und Ewigkeit bei Augustin, Boethius und Swinburne und trinitarische Lösungswege
AU - Mühling, Markus
PY - 2005/11
Y1 - 2005/11
N2 - The author describes three types of understanding eternity: eternity as timelessness (e.g. Augustin), eternity as complete or partial co-temporality (e.g. Boethius) and eternity as endlessness (e.g. Richard Swinburne). Under the conditions of the first type, there is no link between God and world. Action, alterity and novalty are meaningless concepts. Under the conditions of the second one the world gets more value, but still the notions of action (divine and human) and novalty remain meaningless. The third type avoids all these difficulties but the categorical difference between God and world vanishes. In order to overcome these problems, the author suggests to understand eternity strictly as the events of the inner-trinitarian relationships and the human eschatological hope as participation in this inner-trinitarian network by grace. © Walter de Gruyter 2005.
AB - The author describes three types of understanding eternity: eternity as timelessness (e.g. Augustin), eternity as complete or partial co-temporality (e.g. Boethius) and eternity as endlessness (e.g. Richard Swinburne). Under the conditions of the first type, there is no link between God and world. Action, alterity and novalty are meaningless concepts. Under the conditions of the second one the world gets more value, but still the notions of action (divine and human) and novalty remain meaningless. The third type avoids all these difficulties but the categorical difference between God and world vanishes. In order to overcome these problems, the author suggests to understand eternity strictly as the events of the inner-trinitarian relationships and the human eschatological hope as participation in this inner-trinitarian network by grace. © Walter de Gruyter 2005.
KW - Theologie
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70749099680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9e265bd0-21c6-3719-90b9-5eaf9dfa9294/
U2 - 10.1515/nzst.2005.47.2.154
DO - 10.1515/nzst.2005.47.2.154
M3 - Übersichtsarbeiten
VL - 47
SP - 154
EP - 172
JO - Neue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
JF - Neue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
SN - 0028-3517
IS - 2
ER -