Empowering materials processing and performance from data and AI

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenAndere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.)Forschung

Standard

Empowering materials processing and performance from data and AI. / Chinesta, Francisco; Cueto, Elias; Klusemann, Benjamin.
in: Materials, Jahrgang 14, Nr. 16, 4409, 06.08.2021.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenAndere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.)Forschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chinesta F, Cueto E, Klusemann B. Empowering materials processing and performance from data and AI. Materials. 2021 Aug 6;14(16):4409. doi: 10.3390/ma14164409

Bibtex

@article{2f93e8c4b65049fe98ea7e5fa8340bae,
title = "Empowering materials processing and performance from data and AI",
abstract = "Third millennium engineering is addressing new challenges in materials sciencesand engineering. In particular, the advances in materials engineering, combined with the advances in data acquisition, processing and mining as well as artificial intelligence, allow new ways of thinking in designing new materials and products. Additionally, this gives rise to new paradigms in bridging raw material data and processing to the induced properties and performance. On the one hand, the linkage can be done purely on a data-driven basis, i.e., models are created from scratch based on the obtained experimental data alone, forinstance with statistical methods or advanced methods of machine learning. Particularly obvious advantages of such kinds of models are that no simplification or assumptions need to be incorporated a priori, and that it allows real-time prediction, leading to a so-called digital twin of the specific material/process. However, such approaches typically face somegeneral challenges, such as the necessity of (maybe unnecessarily) large and comprehensive datasets, because they rely only on the data themselves and allow prediction only within the investigated/trained dataspace. Another way of addressing the challenge of predicting the complex processing–structure–property relationships in materials is the enhancement of already existing physics-based models via data and machine learning tools, i.e., combininga physics-based model (often called virtual twin) and a data-based model, leading to a so-called hybrid twin [1]. In this regard, possible deviations of the physics-based model, which rely on a number of simplifications and assumptions, can be healed by correcting the model based on a data-driven approach, i.e., combining the advantages of both models.",
keywords = "Engineering",
author = "Francisco Chinesta and Elias Cueto and Benjamin Klusemann",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "6",
doi = "10.3390/ma14164409",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Materials",
issn = "1996-1944",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "16",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowering materials processing and performance from data and AI

AU - Chinesta, Francisco

AU - Cueto, Elias

AU - Klusemann, Benjamin

PY - 2021/8/6

Y1 - 2021/8/6

N2 - Third millennium engineering is addressing new challenges in materials sciencesand engineering. In particular, the advances in materials engineering, combined with the advances in data acquisition, processing and mining as well as artificial intelligence, allow new ways of thinking in designing new materials and products. Additionally, this gives rise to new paradigms in bridging raw material data and processing to the induced properties and performance. On the one hand, the linkage can be done purely on a data-driven basis, i.e., models are created from scratch based on the obtained experimental data alone, forinstance with statistical methods or advanced methods of machine learning. Particularly obvious advantages of such kinds of models are that no simplification or assumptions need to be incorporated a priori, and that it allows real-time prediction, leading to a so-called digital twin of the specific material/process. However, such approaches typically face somegeneral challenges, such as the necessity of (maybe unnecessarily) large and comprehensive datasets, because they rely only on the data themselves and allow prediction only within the investigated/trained dataspace. Another way of addressing the challenge of predicting the complex processing–structure–property relationships in materials is the enhancement of already existing physics-based models via data and machine learning tools, i.e., combininga physics-based model (often called virtual twin) and a data-based model, leading to a so-called hybrid twin [1]. In this regard, possible deviations of the physics-based model, which rely on a number of simplifications and assumptions, can be healed by correcting the model based on a data-driven approach, i.e., combining the advantages of both models.

AB - Third millennium engineering is addressing new challenges in materials sciencesand engineering. In particular, the advances in materials engineering, combined with the advances in data acquisition, processing and mining as well as artificial intelligence, allow new ways of thinking in designing new materials and products. Additionally, this gives rise to new paradigms in bridging raw material data and processing to the induced properties and performance. On the one hand, the linkage can be done purely on a data-driven basis, i.e., models are created from scratch based on the obtained experimental data alone, forinstance with statistical methods or advanced methods of machine learning. Particularly obvious advantages of such kinds of models are that no simplification or assumptions need to be incorporated a priori, and that it allows real-time prediction, leading to a so-called digital twin of the specific material/process. However, such approaches typically face somegeneral challenges, such as the necessity of (maybe unnecessarily) large and comprehensive datasets, because they rely only on the data themselves and allow prediction only within the investigated/trained dataspace. Another way of addressing the challenge of predicting the complex processing–structure–property relationships in materials is the enhancement of already existing physics-based models via data and machine learning tools, i.e., combininga physics-based model (often called virtual twin) and a data-based model, leading to a so-called hybrid twin [1]. In this regard, possible deviations of the physics-based model, which rely on a number of simplifications and assumptions, can be healed by correcting the model based on a data-driven approach, i.e., combining the advantages of both models.

KW - Engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112284614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8253a036-5593-38d4-bb10-582b4bc9dae6/

U2 - 10.3390/ma14164409

DO - 10.3390/ma14164409

M3 - Other (editorial matter etc.)

C2 - 34442931

AN - SCOPUS:85112284614

VL - 14

JO - Materials

JF - Materials

SN - 1996-1944

IS - 16

M1 - 4409

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Conceptual understanding of complex components and Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem
  2. Homogenization methods for multi-phase elastic composites with non-elliptical reinforcements
  3. Identification of conductive fiber parameters with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation signal using RLS algorithm
  4. Artificial intelligence
  5. Early Detection of Faillure in Conveyor Chain Systems by Wireless Sensor Node
  6. Design, Modeling and Control of an Over-actuated Hexacopter Tilt-Rotor
  7. A framework for business model development in technology-driven start-ups
  8. Introducing split orders and optimizing operational policies in robotic mobile fulfillment systems
  9. Comparison of Bio-Inspired Algorithms in a Case Study for Optimizing Capacitor Bank Allocation in Electrical Power Distribution
  10. Managing complexity in automative production
  11. Designing and evaluating blended learning bridging courses in mathematics
  12. What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example
  13. Do connectives improve the level of understandability in mathematical reality-based tasks?
  14. Executive function and Language Learning
  15. An error management perspective on audit quality
  16. TARGET SETTING FOR OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS - STUDY CASE -
  17. Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving
  18. The temporal pattern of creativity and implementation in teams
  19. Conceptions of problem solving mathematics teaching
  20. A reference architecture for the integration of EMIS and ERP-Systems
  21. The erosion of relational values resulting from landscape simplification
  22. Parametric finite element model and mechanical characterisation of electrospun materials for biomedical applications
  23. What´s in a net? or: The end of the average
  24. Governing Objects from a Distance
  25. Obstacle Coordinates Transformation from TVS Body-Frame to AGV Navigation-Frame
  26. Noninteracting optimal and adaptive torque control using an online parameter estimation with help of polynomials in EKF for a PMSM