Distribution of Organophosphate Esters between the Gas and Particle Phase-Model Predictions vs Measured Data

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Distribution of Organophosphate Esters between the Gas and Particle Phase-Model Predictions vs Measured Data. / Sühring, Roxana; Wolschke, Hendrik; Diamond, Miriam L. et al.
in: Environmental Science & Technology, Jahrgang 50, Nr. 13, 05.07.2016, S. 6644-6651.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b45787c87f9a4260be20062ec7eaef48,
title = "Distribution of Organophosphate Esters between the Gas and Particle Phase-Model Predictions vs Measured Data",
abstract = "Gas-particle partitioning is one of the key factors that affect the environmental fate of semivolatile organic chemicals. Many organophosphate esters (OPEs) have been reported to primarily partition to particles in the atmosphere. However, because of the wide range of their physicochemical properties, it is unlikely that OPEs are mainly in the particle phase {"}as a class{"}. We compared gas-particle partitioning predictions for 32 OPEs made by the commonly used OECD POV and LRTP Screening Tool ({"}the Tool{"}) with the partitioning models of Junge-Pankow (J-P) and Harner-Bidleman (H-B), as well as recently measured data on OPE gas-particle partitioning. The results indicate that half of the tested OPEs partition into the gas phase. Partitioning into the gas phase seems to be determined by an octanol-air partition coefficient (log KOA) <10 and a subcooled liquid vapor pressure (log PL) > -5 (PL in Pa), as well as the total suspended particle concentration (TSP) in the sampling area. The uncertainty of the physicochemical property data of the OPEs did not change this estimate. Furthermore, the predictions by the Tool, J-P- and H-B-models agreed with recently measured OPE gas-particle partitioning.",
keywords = "Chemistry, Esters, Forecasting, Organic chemicals, Uncertainty analysis, Environmental fate, Gas-particle partitioning, Octanol air-partition, Organophosphate esters, Physicochemical property, Sampling areas, Subcooled liquid, Total suspended particles",
author = "Roxana S{\"u}hring and Hendrik Wolschke and Diamond, {Miriam L.} and Jantunen, {Liisa M.} and Martin Scheringer",
year = "2016",
month = jul,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1021/acs.est.6b00199",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "6644--6651",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "13",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distribution of Organophosphate Esters between the Gas and Particle Phase-Model Predictions vs Measured Data

AU - Sühring, Roxana

AU - Wolschke, Hendrik

AU - Diamond, Miriam L.

AU - Jantunen, Liisa M.

AU - Scheringer, Martin

PY - 2016/7/5

Y1 - 2016/7/5

N2 - Gas-particle partitioning is one of the key factors that affect the environmental fate of semivolatile organic chemicals. Many organophosphate esters (OPEs) have been reported to primarily partition to particles in the atmosphere. However, because of the wide range of their physicochemical properties, it is unlikely that OPEs are mainly in the particle phase "as a class". We compared gas-particle partitioning predictions for 32 OPEs made by the commonly used OECD POV and LRTP Screening Tool ("the Tool") with the partitioning models of Junge-Pankow (J-P) and Harner-Bidleman (H-B), as well as recently measured data on OPE gas-particle partitioning. The results indicate that half of the tested OPEs partition into the gas phase. Partitioning into the gas phase seems to be determined by an octanol-air partition coefficient (log KOA) <10 and a subcooled liquid vapor pressure (log PL) > -5 (PL in Pa), as well as the total suspended particle concentration (TSP) in the sampling area. The uncertainty of the physicochemical property data of the OPEs did not change this estimate. Furthermore, the predictions by the Tool, J-P- and H-B-models agreed with recently measured OPE gas-particle partitioning.

AB - Gas-particle partitioning is one of the key factors that affect the environmental fate of semivolatile organic chemicals. Many organophosphate esters (OPEs) have been reported to primarily partition to particles in the atmosphere. However, because of the wide range of their physicochemical properties, it is unlikely that OPEs are mainly in the particle phase "as a class". We compared gas-particle partitioning predictions for 32 OPEs made by the commonly used OECD POV and LRTP Screening Tool ("the Tool") with the partitioning models of Junge-Pankow (J-P) and Harner-Bidleman (H-B), as well as recently measured data on OPE gas-particle partitioning. The results indicate that half of the tested OPEs partition into the gas phase. Partitioning into the gas phase seems to be determined by an octanol-air partition coefficient (log KOA) <10 and a subcooled liquid vapor pressure (log PL) > -5 (PL in Pa), as well as the total suspended particle concentration (TSP) in the sampling area. The uncertainty of the physicochemical property data of the OPEs did not change this estimate. Furthermore, the predictions by the Tool, J-P- and H-B-models agreed with recently measured OPE gas-particle partitioning.

KW - Chemistry

KW - Esters

KW - Forecasting

KW - Organic chemicals

KW - Uncertainty analysis

KW - Environmental fate

KW - Gas-particle partitioning

KW - Octanol air-partition

KW - Organophosphate esters

KW - Physicochemical property

KW - Sampling areas

KW - Subcooled liquid

KW - Total suspended particles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978993746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.6b00199

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.6b00199

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 27144674

AN - SCOPUS:84978993746

VL - 50

SP - 6644

EP - 6651

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 13

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Projekte

  1. Campus Virtuell

Publikationen

  1. Exploring fruitful links between real-world laboratory and disciplinary research Introduction of the DKN Future Earth working group LinkLab
  2. Potential bias in meta-analyses of effect sizes in imaging genetics
  3. Lernen in Netzwerken
  4. Introduction to Thinking the Problematic
  5. Understanding spam
  6. Nostalgia is not what it used to be
  7. Burdens, Stresses, Resources and Needs of School Management and Teaching staff during the Corona Pandemic. Results of a qualitative Interview Study at primary and secondary Schools in Hesse
  8. Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials
  9. The challenges of gamifying CSR communication
  10. The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas
  11. Cross-level Information and Influence in Mandated Participatory Planning: Alternative Pathways to Sustainable Water Management in Germany’s Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive
  12. “The whole is greater than the sum of its parts” – Exploring teachers’ technology readiness profiles and its relation to their emotional state during COVID-19 emergency remote teaching
  13. The Change Challenge
  14. A hybrid actuator modelling and hysteresis effect identification in camless internal combustion engines control
  15. Expanding the pie or spoiling the cake? How the number of negotiation issues affects integrative bargaining
  16. Be smart, play dumb? A transactional perspective on day-specific knowledge hiding, interpersonal conflict, and psychological strain
  17. Climate-smart socially innovative tools and approaches for marine pollution science in support of sustainable development
  18. Gehen in der Datenbank – Der BMLwalker
  19. Effect of Sn additions on the age hardening response, microstructures and corrosion resistance of Mg-0.8Ca (wt%) alloys
  20. Singularities and Superintelligence
  21. Evaluation of a temporal causal model for predicting the mood of clients in an online therapy
  22. Study Protocol
  23. The Effectivity of Technological Innovation on Mitigating the Costs of Climate Change Policies

Presse / Medien

  1. Too long, didn't read?