Die beiden Statutenlehren: Geschichte eines rechtshistorischen Missverständnisses

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Die beiden Statutenlehren: Geschichte eines rechtshistorischen Missverständnisses. / Boosfeld, Kristin.
in: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung, Jahrgang 136, Nr. 1, 26.06.2019, S. 76-93.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1d484f2437f3410da618877bdc98f059,
title = "Die beiden Statutenlehren: Geschichte eines rechtshistorischen Missverst{\"a}ndnisses",
abstract = "Most German legal historians have heard of a late medieval theory of statuta. However, different views exist as to the content of this theory. Some view it as a theory providing rules on which of several conflicting local laws to apply. Others, in contrast, understand it as a theory on the relation of local laws with the (Roman) common law. The roots of this ambivalence go back to the work of the controversial legal historian Franz Wieacker who used the terminology of theory of statuta for a different phenomenon than his colleagues all over Europe at the time.",
keywords = "Bartolus de Saxoferrato, Conflict of laws, Franz Wieacker, theory of statuta, Geschichtswissenschaft, Rechtswissenschaft",
author = "Kristin Boosfeld",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH.",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1515/zrgg-2019-0003",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "136",
pages = "76--93",
journal = "Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung",
issn = "0323-4045",
publisher = "B{\"o}hlau Verlag GmbH",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Die beiden Statutenlehren

T2 - Geschichte eines rechtshistorischen Missverständnisses

AU - Boosfeld, Kristin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

PY - 2019/6/26

Y1 - 2019/6/26

N2 - Most German legal historians have heard of a late medieval theory of statuta. However, different views exist as to the content of this theory. Some view it as a theory providing rules on which of several conflicting local laws to apply. Others, in contrast, understand it as a theory on the relation of local laws with the (Roman) common law. The roots of this ambivalence go back to the work of the controversial legal historian Franz Wieacker who used the terminology of theory of statuta for a different phenomenon than his colleagues all over Europe at the time.

AB - Most German legal historians have heard of a late medieval theory of statuta. However, different views exist as to the content of this theory. Some view it as a theory providing rules on which of several conflicting local laws to apply. Others, in contrast, understand it as a theory on the relation of local laws with the (Roman) common law. The roots of this ambivalence go back to the work of the controversial legal historian Franz Wieacker who used the terminology of theory of statuta for a different phenomenon than his colleagues all over Europe at the time.

KW - Bartolus de Saxoferrato

KW - Conflict of laws

KW - Franz Wieacker

KW - theory of statuta

KW - Geschichtswissenschaft

KW - Rechtswissenschaft

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070350597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/zrgg-2019-0003

DO - 10.1515/zrgg-2019-0003

M3 - Übersichtsarbeiten

AN - SCOPUS:85070350597

VL - 136

SP - 76

EP - 93

JO - Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung

JF - Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung

SN - 0323-4045

IS - 1

ER -

DOI