Democracy Misunderstood: Authoritarian Notions of Democracy around the Globe

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Democracy Misunderstood: Authoritarian Notions of Democracy around the Globe. / Kirsch, Helen; Welzel, Christian Peter.
in: Social Forces, Jahrgang 98, Nr. 1, soy114, 01.09.2019, S. 59-92.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kirsch H, Welzel CP. Democracy Misunderstood: Authoritarian Notions of Democracy around the Globe. Social Forces. 2019 Sep 1;98(1):59-92. soy114. Epub 2018 Dez 14. doi: 10.1093/sf/soy114

Bibtex

@article{30feff27d1fb4068ad87a2bcb463efd3,
title = "Democracy Misunderstood: Authoritarian Notions of Democracy around the Globe",
abstract = "An intriguing phenomenon consists in the fact that widespread support for democracy coexists in many countries with the persistent absence of democracy itself. Addressing this phenomenon, we show that in most places where it exists people understand democracy in ambiguous ways, such that “authoritarian” notions of what democracy means mix with—and even overshadow—liberal notions, in spite of the contradiction between these two notions. Underlining this contradiction, our evidence shows that authoritarian notions of democracy question the authenticity of liberal notions when both are endorsed conjointly. Worse, the evidence further suggests that authoritarian notions reverse the whole meaning of support for democracy, indeed indicating support for autocracy instead. Arguably, this reversal in the meaning of support for democracy lends legitimacy to authoritarian rule, which helps to explain where autocracy endures. Testing alternative explanations of authoritarian notions of democracy, we find that emancipative values are most influential, exerting a two-fold “enlightening” effect in (a) making people recognize the contradiction between liberal and authoritarian notions of democracy and (b) turning them against authoritarian notions. In a nutshell, the prospects of democracy are bleak where emancipative values remain weak.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Helen Kirsch and Welzel, {Christian Peter}",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/sf/soy114",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "59--92",
journal = "Social Forces",
issn = "0037-7732",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Democracy Misunderstood: Authoritarian Notions of Democracy around the Globe

AU - Kirsch, Helen

AU - Welzel, Christian Peter

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - An intriguing phenomenon consists in the fact that widespread support for democracy coexists in many countries with the persistent absence of democracy itself. Addressing this phenomenon, we show that in most places where it exists people understand democracy in ambiguous ways, such that “authoritarian” notions of what democracy means mix with—and even overshadow—liberal notions, in spite of the contradiction between these two notions. Underlining this contradiction, our evidence shows that authoritarian notions of democracy question the authenticity of liberal notions when both are endorsed conjointly. Worse, the evidence further suggests that authoritarian notions reverse the whole meaning of support for democracy, indeed indicating support for autocracy instead. Arguably, this reversal in the meaning of support for democracy lends legitimacy to authoritarian rule, which helps to explain where autocracy endures. Testing alternative explanations of authoritarian notions of democracy, we find that emancipative values are most influential, exerting a two-fold “enlightening” effect in (a) making people recognize the contradiction between liberal and authoritarian notions of democracy and (b) turning them against authoritarian notions. In a nutshell, the prospects of democracy are bleak where emancipative values remain weak.

AB - An intriguing phenomenon consists in the fact that widespread support for democracy coexists in many countries with the persistent absence of democracy itself. Addressing this phenomenon, we show that in most places where it exists people understand democracy in ambiguous ways, such that “authoritarian” notions of what democracy means mix with—and even overshadow—liberal notions, in spite of the contradiction between these two notions. Underlining this contradiction, our evidence shows that authoritarian notions of democracy question the authenticity of liberal notions when both are endorsed conjointly. Worse, the evidence further suggests that authoritarian notions reverse the whole meaning of support for democracy, indeed indicating support for autocracy instead. Arguably, this reversal in the meaning of support for democracy lends legitimacy to authoritarian rule, which helps to explain where autocracy endures. Testing alternative explanations of authoritarian notions of democracy, we find that emancipative values are most influential, exerting a two-fold “enlightening” effect in (a) making people recognize the contradiction between liberal and authoritarian notions of democracy and (b) turning them against authoritarian notions. In a nutshell, the prospects of democracy are bleak where emancipative values remain weak.

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081542547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/sf/soy114

DO - 10.1093/sf/soy114

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 98

SP - 59

EP - 92

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

SN - 0037-7732

IS - 1

M1 - soy114

ER -

DOI