1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Defeminizing Sustainability
  6. Formate
  7. //

Defeminizing Sustainability: How to Boost Men’s Motivation for Proenvironmental Behavior

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Defeminizing Sustainability: How to Boost Men’s Motivation for Proenvironmental Behavior. / Hällfritzsch, Maria; Volpi, Lucia; Daniel, Kenneth G. et al.
in: Motivation Science, 2024.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Hällfritzsch, M, Volpi, L, Daniel, KG, Somogyi, C, Kause, A, Reese, G & Loschelder, DD 2024, 'Defeminizing Sustainability: How to Boost Men’s Motivation for Proenvironmental Behavior', Motivation Science. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000371

APA

Hällfritzsch, M., Volpi, L., Daniel, K. G., Somogyi, C., Kause, A., Reese, G., & Loschelder, D. D. (2024). Defeminizing Sustainability: How to Boost Men’s Motivation for Proenvironmental Behavior. Motivation Science. Vorzeitige Online-Publikation. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000371

Vancouver

Hällfritzsch M, Volpi L, Daniel KG, Somogyi C, Kause A, Reese G et al. Defeminizing Sustainability: How to Boost Men’s Motivation for Proenvironmental Behavior. Motivation Science. 2024. Epub 2024. doi: 10.1037/mot0000371

Bibtex

@article{9857cd7b18914c5c8e81a5ac6fbf084c,
title = "Defeminizing Sustainability: How to Boost Men{\textquoteright}s Motivation for Proenvironmental Behavior",
abstract = "While recent studies found women frequently behaving more sustainably than men, few studies investigated interventionsmotivatingmen to act (more) proenvironmentally. According to the precarious manhood hypothesis, men may be less motivated because they consider sustainability as a feminine attribute threatening their male identity. We conducted a pilot study (N= 165) to determine which proenvironmental behaviors are indeed perceived as more feminine versus masculine. Two subsequent preregistered main studies (N1= 281, N2= 226) tested experimental interventions designed to motivate men to behave more proenvironmentally in a 4 (condition)× 3 (time:T1 vs. T2 vs. T3) design. Male participants were randomly assigned to either a control or to one of two intervention conditions. The intervention conditions attempted to motivate men to behave more proenvironmentally with pictures and self-reflection exercises. In Study 1, the pictures consisted of men engaging in (a) feminine behaviors (e.g., wearing a dress) or (b) feminine sustainable behaviors (e.g., picking up trash). In the intervention conditions, men{\textquoteright}s scores increased for some sustainability measures. Replicating prior studies, however, women generally scored higher than men on all sustainability measures, regardless of condition. In Study 2, our updated interventions consisted of a dynamic norm message and pictures of men engaging in allegedly (a) feminine (e.g., buying regional food) or (b) masculine (e.g., installing water-efficient appliances) sustainable behaviors. Men in both intervention conditions significantly increased their proenvironmental behavioral intentions from T1 to T2. Mediation analyses suggest that antifemininity explained the gender disparity in sustainability in both studies.",
keywords = "antifemininity, gender difference, gender role norms, sustainability, Management studies",
author = "Maria H{\"a}llfritzsch and Lucia Volpi and Daniel, {Kenneth G.} and Csenge Somogyi and Astrid Kause and Gerhard Reese and Loschelder, {David D.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 American Psychological Association",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1037/mot0000371",
language = "English",
journal = "Motivation Science",
issn = "2333-8113",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defeminizing Sustainability

T2 - How to Boost Men’s Motivation for Proenvironmental Behavior

AU - Hällfritzsch, Maria

AU - Volpi, Lucia

AU - Daniel, Kenneth G.

AU - Somogyi, Csenge

AU - Kause, Astrid

AU - Reese, Gerhard

AU - Loschelder, David D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 American Psychological Association

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - While recent studies found women frequently behaving more sustainably than men, few studies investigated interventionsmotivatingmen to act (more) proenvironmentally. According to the precarious manhood hypothesis, men may be less motivated because they consider sustainability as a feminine attribute threatening their male identity. We conducted a pilot study (N= 165) to determine which proenvironmental behaviors are indeed perceived as more feminine versus masculine. Two subsequent preregistered main studies (N1= 281, N2= 226) tested experimental interventions designed to motivate men to behave more proenvironmentally in a 4 (condition)× 3 (time:T1 vs. T2 vs. T3) design. Male participants were randomly assigned to either a control or to one of two intervention conditions. The intervention conditions attempted to motivate men to behave more proenvironmentally with pictures and self-reflection exercises. In Study 1, the pictures consisted of men engaging in (a) feminine behaviors (e.g., wearing a dress) or (b) feminine sustainable behaviors (e.g., picking up trash). In the intervention conditions, men’s scores increased for some sustainability measures. Replicating prior studies, however, women generally scored higher than men on all sustainability measures, regardless of condition. In Study 2, our updated interventions consisted of a dynamic norm message and pictures of men engaging in allegedly (a) feminine (e.g., buying regional food) or (b) masculine (e.g., installing water-efficient appliances) sustainable behaviors. Men in both intervention conditions significantly increased their proenvironmental behavioral intentions from T1 to T2. Mediation analyses suggest that antifemininity explained the gender disparity in sustainability in both studies.

AB - While recent studies found women frequently behaving more sustainably than men, few studies investigated interventionsmotivatingmen to act (more) proenvironmentally. According to the precarious manhood hypothesis, men may be less motivated because they consider sustainability as a feminine attribute threatening their male identity. We conducted a pilot study (N= 165) to determine which proenvironmental behaviors are indeed perceived as more feminine versus masculine. Two subsequent preregistered main studies (N1= 281, N2= 226) tested experimental interventions designed to motivate men to behave more proenvironmentally in a 4 (condition)× 3 (time:T1 vs. T2 vs. T3) design. Male participants were randomly assigned to either a control or to one of two intervention conditions. The intervention conditions attempted to motivate men to behave more proenvironmentally with pictures and self-reflection exercises. In Study 1, the pictures consisted of men engaging in (a) feminine behaviors (e.g., wearing a dress) or (b) feminine sustainable behaviors (e.g., picking up trash). In the intervention conditions, men’s scores increased for some sustainability measures. Replicating prior studies, however, women generally scored higher than men on all sustainability measures, regardless of condition. In Study 2, our updated interventions consisted of a dynamic norm message and pictures of men engaging in allegedly (a) feminine (e.g., buying regional food) or (b) masculine (e.g., installing water-efficient appliances) sustainable behaviors. Men in both intervention conditions significantly increased their proenvironmental behavioral intentions from T1 to T2. Mediation analyses suggest that antifemininity explained the gender disparity in sustainability in both studies.

KW - antifemininity

KW - gender difference

KW - gender role norms

KW - sustainability

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207717741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/mot0000371

DO - 10.1037/mot0000371

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85207717741

JO - Motivation Science

JF - Motivation Science

SN - 2333-8113

ER -

In der gleichen Zeitschrift

Self-Regulatory Thought Across Time and Domains

Sevincer, A. T., Feller, E. & Wallot, S., 2024, (Angenommen/Im Druck) in: Motivation Science.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Resolving Incompleteness on Social Media: Online Self-Symbolizing Reduces the Orienting Effects of Incomplete Identity Goals

Sciara, S., Regalia, C. & Gollwitzer, P. M., 01.09.2022, in: Motivation Science. 8, 3, S. 268-275 8 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Regulatory focus and thinking about the future versus reality.

Sevincer, A. T. & Oettingen, G., 01.09.2021, in: Motivation Science. 7, 3, S. 334-344 11 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Task Choice Immunizes Against Incidental Affective Influences in Volition

Gendolla, G. H. E., Bouzidi, Y. S., Arvaniti, S., Gollwitzer, P. M. & Oettingen, G., 09.2021, in: Motivation Science. 7, 3, S. 229-241 13 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

A Preregistered Test of Competing Theories to Explain Ego Depletion Effects Using Psychophysiological Indicators of Mental Effort

Gieseler, K., Loschelder, D. D., Job, V. & Friese, M., 01.03.2021, in: Motivation Science. 7, 1, S. 32-45 14 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., Pronizius, E., Broek, K. L. V. D., Vlasceanu, D., Constantino, S., Morais, M. J., Schumann, P., Rathje, S., Fang, K., Aglioti, S. M., Alfano, M., Alvarado-Yepez, A. J., Andersen, A., Anseel, F., Apps, M. A. J., Asadli, C., Awuor, F. J., Azevedo, F., Basaglia, P., Bélanger, J. J., Berger, S., Bertin, P., Białek, M., Bialobrzeska, O., Blaya-Burgo, M., Bleize, D. N. M., Bø, S., Boecker, L., Boggio, P. S., Borau, S., Bos, B., Bouguettaya, A., Brauer, M., Brick, C., Brik, T., Briker, R., Brosch, T., Buchel, O., Buonauro, D., Butalia, R., Carvacho, H., Chamberlain, S. A. E., Chan, H-Y., Chow, D., Chung, D., Cian, L., Cohen-Eick, N., Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Contu, D., Cristea, V., Cutler, J., D'Ottone, S., Keersmaecker, J. D., Delcourt, S., Delouvée, S., Diel, K., Douglas, B. D., Drupp, M. A., Dubey, S., Ekmanis, J., Elbaek, C. T., Elsherif, M., Engelhard, I. M., Escher, Y. A., Etienne, T. W., Farage, L., Farias, A. R., Feuerriegel, S., Findor, A., Freira, L., Friese, M., Gains, N. P., Gallyamova, A., Geiger, S. J., Genschow, O., Gjoneska, B., Gkinopoulos, T., Goldberg, B., Goldenberg, A., Gradidge, S., Grassini, S., Gray, K., Grelle, S., Griffin, S. M., Grigoryan, L., Grigoryan, A., Grigoryev, D., Gruber, J., Guilaran, J., Hadar, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., Halperin, E., Harvey, A. J., Haugestad, C. A. P., Herman, A. M., Hershfield, H. E., Himichi, T., Hine, D. W., Hofmann, W., Howe, L., Huaman-Chulluncuy, E. T., Huang, G., Ishii, T., Ito, A., Jia, F., Jost, J. T., Jovanović, V., Jurgiel, D., Kácha, O., Kankaanpää, R., Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Mintz, K. K., Kaya, I., Kaya, O., Khachatryan, N., Klas, A., Klein, C., Klöckner, C. A., Koppel, L., Kosachenko, A. I., Kothe, E. J., Krebs, R., Krosch, A. R., Krouwel, A. P. M., Kyrychenko, Y., Lagomarsino, M., Lamm, C., Lange, F., Cunningham, J. L., Lees, J., Leung, T. Y., Levy, N., Lockwood, P. L., Longoni, C., Ortega, A. L., Loschelder, D. D., Lu, J. G., Luo, Y., Luomba, J., Lutz, A. E., Majer, J. M., Markowitz, E., Marsh, A. A., Mascarenhas, K. L., Mbilingi, B., Mbungu, W., McHugh, C., Meijers, M. H. C., Mercier, H., Mhagama, F. L., Michalakis, K., Mikus, N., Milliron, S., Mitkidis, P., Monge-Rodríguez, F. S., Mora, Y. L., Moreau, D., Motoki, K., Moyano, M., Mus, M., Navajas, J., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, D. M., Nguyen, T., Niemi, L., Nijssen, S. R. R., Nilsonne, G., Nitschke, J. P., Nockur, L., Okura, R., Öner, S., Özdoğru, A. A., Palumbo, H., Panagopoulos, C., Panasiti, M. S., Pärnamets, P., Paruzel-Czachura, M., Pavlov, Y. G., Payán-Gómez, C., Pearson, A. R., Costa, L. P. D., Petrowsky, H. M., Pfattheicher, S., Pham, N. T., Ponizovskiy, V., Pretus, C., Rêgo, G. G., Reimann, R., Rhoads, S. A., Riano-Moreno, J., Richter, I., Röer, J. P., Rosa-Sullivan, J., Ross, R. M., Sabherwal, A., Saito, T., Sarrasin, O., Say, N., Schmid, K., Schmitt, M. T., Schoenegger, P., Scholz, C., Schug, M. G., Schulreich, S., Shreedhar, G., Shuman, E., Sivan, S., Sjåstad, H., Soliman, M., Soud, K., Spampatti, T., Sparkman, G., Spasovski, O., Stanley, S. K., Stern, J. A., Strahm, N., Suko, Y., Sul, S., Syropoulos, S., Taylor, N. C., Tedaldi, E., Tinghög, G., Huynh, L. D. T., Travaglino, G. A., Tsakiris, M., Tüter, İ., Tyrala, M., Uluğ, Ö. M., Urbanek, A., Valko, D., Linden, S. V. D., Schie, K. V., Stekelenburg, A. V., Vanags, E., Västfjäll, D., Vesely, S., Vintr, J., Vranka, M., Wanguche, P. O., Willer, R., Wojcik, A. D., Xu, R., Yadav, A., Zawisza, M., Zhao, X., Zhao, J., Żuk, D. & Bavel, J. J. V., 09.02.2024, in: Science Advances. 10, 6, 19 S., eadj5778.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Empowered or informed? Seeking to mitigate gender differences in first-offer assertiveness through pre-negotiation interventions

Kokić, E., Wagner, L., García López del Amo, A., Giering, C. L., Ly Truong, V., Petrowsky, H. M., Husen, O. M. & Loschelder, D. D., 01.12.2024, in: Journal of Economic Psychology. 105, 11 S., 102775.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Gender differences in sex drive: Reply to Conley and Yang (2024)

Frankenbach, J., Weber, M., Loschelder, D. D., Kilger, H. & Friese, M., 01.08.2024, in: Psychological Bulletin. 150, 8, S. 1011-1019 9 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

How perfect is (too) perfect? Illuminating why the perfectionism-performance-relationship is (non-)linear

Nols, T., Kohlenberg, S. A., Klein, S. B., Boecker, L., Cross, A. E. & Loschelder, D. D., 01.10.2024, in: Personality and Individual Differences. 228, 9 S., 112725.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Is the joke on you? The impact of sexist humour and gender dynamics on interpersonal work outcomes

Bouckaert, Y., Vofrei, L., Jonczyk, N., Mertens, A., Soliman, M., Venz, L. & Loschelder, D. D., 11.2024, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI