Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability. / Baker, Max ; Gray, Rob; Schaltegger, Stefan.
in: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Jahrgang 36, Nr. 2, 27.03.2023, S. 591-619.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9efba26025674ad4a3c7bc219b324499,
title = "Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability",
abstract = "Purpose: This article explores and contrasts the views of two influential research projects within the social and environmental accounting space. Both projects advocate for sustainability. The first here referred to as the Critical Social and Environmental Accounting Project (CSEAP), was developed and championed by Rob Gray and calls for immediate radical structural change. The second one is called the Pragmatic Sustainability Management Accounting Project (PSMAP), championed by Stefan Schaltegger, and advocates for an entrepreneurial process of creating radical solutions in joint stakeholder collaboration over time. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is the culmination of a decade-long debate between Gray and Schaltegger as advocates of CSEAP and PSMAP, respectively. Specifically, the paper explores the differences and agreements between CSEAP and PSMAP on whether and how companies should pursue sustainability and the role of accounting in these efforts. The paper focusses on critical issues that exemplify the tension in their views: general goals, the role of structure and agency and how to creating change and transformation. Findings: The article contrasts CSEAP's uncompromising antagonising approach to accountability and fundamental systemic change with PSMAP's pragmatic approach to sustainability accounting with its management and entrepreneurship-orientated approach to change and unwavering support for transformative managers on the front lines. Despite their apparent differences, the paper also outlines areas of agreement between these two positions and how accounting and sustainability can move forward. Research limitations/implications: The debate tries to reconcile language and conceptional differences in the social and environmental accounting (SEA) and sustainability management accounting (SMA) communities to reduce confusion in the research space over what sustainability is for organisations and what role accounting plays in this. The authors hope that the tension between the different positions outlined in this paper generates new insights and positions on the topic. Practical implications: While the two views explored in this paper are primarily incompatible, each generates implications for practice, research and education. Debates like this are crucial to moving from discursive disagreement to creating a tolerant and robust foundation for moving forward and achieving much-needed sustainable transitions in the economy and society. Originality/value: The authors offer shared understandings, points of continuing disagreement and alternative views on the nature of sustainability. The debate forges a bridge of understanding where both sides can learn from each other.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Accountability, debate, sustainability, Pragmatic sustainability, Social and environmental accounting project, Sustainable accounting, accountability, Debate, sustainability, Pragmatic sustainability, social and environmental accounting Project, Sustainable accounting",
author = "Max Baker and Rob Gray and Stefan Schaltegger",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1108/aaaj-04-2022-5773",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "591--619",
journal = "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal",
issn = "0951-3574",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability

AU - Baker, Max

AU - Gray, Rob

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.

PY - 2023/3/27

Y1 - 2023/3/27

N2 - Purpose: This article explores and contrasts the views of two influential research projects within the social and environmental accounting space. Both projects advocate for sustainability. The first here referred to as the Critical Social and Environmental Accounting Project (CSEAP), was developed and championed by Rob Gray and calls for immediate radical structural change. The second one is called the Pragmatic Sustainability Management Accounting Project (PSMAP), championed by Stefan Schaltegger, and advocates for an entrepreneurial process of creating radical solutions in joint stakeholder collaboration over time. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is the culmination of a decade-long debate between Gray and Schaltegger as advocates of CSEAP and PSMAP, respectively. Specifically, the paper explores the differences and agreements between CSEAP and PSMAP on whether and how companies should pursue sustainability and the role of accounting in these efforts. The paper focusses on critical issues that exemplify the tension in their views: general goals, the role of structure and agency and how to creating change and transformation. Findings: The article contrasts CSEAP's uncompromising antagonising approach to accountability and fundamental systemic change with PSMAP's pragmatic approach to sustainability accounting with its management and entrepreneurship-orientated approach to change and unwavering support for transformative managers on the front lines. Despite their apparent differences, the paper also outlines areas of agreement between these two positions and how accounting and sustainability can move forward. Research limitations/implications: The debate tries to reconcile language and conceptional differences in the social and environmental accounting (SEA) and sustainability management accounting (SMA) communities to reduce confusion in the research space over what sustainability is for organisations and what role accounting plays in this. The authors hope that the tension between the different positions outlined in this paper generates new insights and positions on the topic. Practical implications: While the two views explored in this paper are primarily incompatible, each generates implications for practice, research and education. Debates like this are crucial to moving from discursive disagreement to creating a tolerant and robust foundation for moving forward and achieving much-needed sustainable transitions in the economy and society. Originality/value: The authors offer shared understandings, points of continuing disagreement and alternative views on the nature of sustainability. The debate forges a bridge of understanding where both sides can learn from each other.

AB - Purpose: This article explores and contrasts the views of two influential research projects within the social and environmental accounting space. Both projects advocate for sustainability. The first here referred to as the Critical Social and Environmental Accounting Project (CSEAP), was developed and championed by Rob Gray and calls for immediate radical structural change. The second one is called the Pragmatic Sustainability Management Accounting Project (PSMAP), championed by Stefan Schaltegger, and advocates for an entrepreneurial process of creating radical solutions in joint stakeholder collaboration over time. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is the culmination of a decade-long debate between Gray and Schaltegger as advocates of CSEAP and PSMAP, respectively. Specifically, the paper explores the differences and agreements between CSEAP and PSMAP on whether and how companies should pursue sustainability and the role of accounting in these efforts. The paper focusses on critical issues that exemplify the tension in their views: general goals, the role of structure and agency and how to creating change and transformation. Findings: The article contrasts CSEAP's uncompromising antagonising approach to accountability and fundamental systemic change with PSMAP's pragmatic approach to sustainability accounting with its management and entrepreneurship-orientated approach to change and unwavering support for transformative managers on the front lines. Despite their apparent differences, the paper also outlines areas of agreement between these two positions and how accounting and sustainability can move forward. Research limitations/implications: The debate tries to reconcile language and conceptional differences in the social and environmental accounting (SEA) and sustainability management accounting (SMA) communities to reduce confusion in the research space over what sustainability is for organisations and what role accounting plays in this. The authors hope that the tension between the different positions outlined in this paper generates new insights and positions on the topic. Practical implications: While the two views explored in this paper are primarily incompatible, each generates implications for practice, research and education. Debates like this are crucial to moving from discursive disagreement to creating a tolerant and robust foundation for moving forward and achieving much-needed sustainable transitions in the economy and society. Originality/value: The authors offer shared understandings, points of continuing disagreement and alternative views on the nature of sustainability. The debate forges a bridge of understanding where both sides can learn from each other.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Accountability

KW - debate

KW - sustainability

KW - Pragmatic sustainability

KW - Social and environmental accounting project

KW - Sustainable accounting

KW - accountability

KW - Debate

KW - sustainability

KW - Pragmatic sustainability

KW - social and environmental accounting Project

KW - Sustainable accounting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136475843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/56cb1223-2750-309e-8106-8c55a4480db0/

U2 - 10.1108/aaaj-04-2022-5773

DO - 10.1108/aaaj-04-2022-5773

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 36

SP - 591

EP - 619

JO - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

JF - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

SN - 0951-3574

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Kontrastive phonologische und phonetische Analyse Weißrussisch-Deutsch und Analyse interferenzbedingter Ausspracheabweichungen
  2. Lernaufgaben zum Interkulturellen Lernen im Spanischunterricht: der deutsch-kolumbianische Film ‚Dr. Alemán’ in der Sekundarstufe II
  3. Benjamins zeitdiagnostische Rezensionstätigkeit zwischen Text und Kontexten. Exemplarische Analysen eines Spannungsverhältnisses
  4. "Mach mal Pause!" Freie Zeit, Freizeitverhalten und Freizeit-Diskurse in der westdeutschen Wiederaufbau-Gesellschaft der 1950er Jahre
  5. Schlobinski, P. (2014). Grundfragen der Sprachwissenschaft. Eine Einführung in die Welt der Sprache(n). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  6. Agrifood Tourism, Rural Resilience, and Recovery in a Postdisaster Context: Insights and Evidence From Kaikoura-hurunui, New Zealand
  7. Subjektive Theorien und biographische Erfahrungen im Professionalisierungsprozess von Lehrkräften – am Beispiel von Umweltbildung
  8. Mündliche Lernertexte auf der Zweinull-Bühne – Mediale Inszenierungen im Englischunterricht am Beispiel eines Schulpodcast-Projekts
  9. Gunmen, Bandits and Ransom Demanders: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Study of the Construction of Abduction in the Nigerian Press
  10. Verhütung als Mittel gegen Bevölkerungswachstum. Expertendiskussion und öffentliche Debatten in Westdeutschland in den 1960er Jahren
  11. Voyeurism? Autobiographies by Children of the Perpetrators. Niklas Frank's: Der Vater. Eine Abrechnung (1987), and Meine deutsche Mutter (2005)
  12. Ein institutionenökonomisch fundiertes Pilotprojekt zur ergebnisorientierten Honorierung ökologischer Leistungen der Landwirtschaft
  13. MEHRSPRACH-ICH: Zur Stärkung multipler sprachlicher Identitäten und literaler Kompetenzen in einem Vorleseprojekt in Kindertagesstätten
  14. Mündliches Beschreiben von Bildern im Kontext des Kunstunterrichts zwischen schulsprachlichen Erwartungen und fachlichen Anforderungen
  15. Das Kunsthistorische Institut in Florenz (Max-Planck-Institut) und die Bibliotheca Hertziana – Max-Planck-Institut für Kunstgeschichte in Rom
  16. Reading Comprehension as Embodied Action: Exploratory Findings on Nonlinear Eye Movement Dynamics and Comprehension of Scientific Texts
  17. Different Subcultures in Residential Groups in Germany – Implications for Participation and the Victimization of Children and Young People
  18. Online-based survey on health literacy and health situation of school principals and vice principals in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic
  19. Tracking Sustainability Targets with Quantitative Indicator Systems for Performance Measurement of Industrial Symbiosis in Industrial Parks
  20. Förderung Benachteiligter in Vergangenheit und Zukunft mit dem Ziel der Berufsausbildung oder der Vorbereitung auf ein Leben in Prekarität?
  21. Entwicklung eines niveaustufenbezogenen, phasenübergreifenden Berufsfähigkeitsprofils für angehende Lehrkräfte - ein dialogorientierter Prozess
  22. Climate Sceptics or Climate Nationalists? Understanding and Explaining Populist Radical Right Parties’ Positions towards Climate Change (1990–2022)
  23. Rezension zu Rug, W. (2012): 77 Klangbilder gesprochenes Deutsch. Übungen, Spiele, Tipps und Tricks zum phonetischen Training Deutsch als Fremdsprache.
  24. Kollaborative Kurzfilmproduktion als innovativer Ansatz in der Hochschulbildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
  25. Überprüfung eines Kompetenzmodells und Messinstruments zur Strukturierung allgemeiner pädagogischer Kompetenz in der universitären Lehrerbildung
  26. Requirements engineering for an industrial symbiosis tool for industrial parks covering system analysis, transformation simulation and goal setting
  27. Book review of Kang-Kwong Luke/Theodossia-Souala Pavlidou: Telephone Calls. Unity and Diversity in Conversational Structure across Languages and Cultures.
  28. Zur (Un-)Bedeutsamkeit der Ökonomisierung. Eine Differenzierung des Einflusses ökonomischer Logiken auf Akteur:innen der stationären Kinder- und Jugendhilfe
  29. Arbeitsbezogene erweiterte Erreichbarkeit im Gastgewerbe. Ergebnisse aus Interviews im Gastgewerbe im Projekt MASTER – Management ständiger Erreichbarkeit
  30. Methodische Grundlagen für die Entwicklung eines Instruments zur vergleichenden Analyse mündlicher Sprachproben von Kindern mit Deutsch als Zweitsprache
  31. Los Huehuetlatolli del Códice Florentino como representaciones (icono)-gráficas de la producción comunicativa de los “naturales” de Nueva España como “pecadores”
  32. "Heavy Metal hat einen berechtigten Platz in der sozialistischen Musikkultur"? Wie in der DDR der 1980er Jahre eine posttraditionelle Jugendkultur verhandelt wurde
  33. »Ich zwinge niemanden, freiwillig zurück zu gehen.« Die institutionelle Umsetzung der Politik der geförderten Rückkehr durch staatliche und nicht-staatliche Akteure
  34. Elaborierte Rückmeldungen zur Qualität von Unterricht: Über empirisch abgesicherte Bezugsnormen als Grundlage für die Weiterentwicklung von Unterricht und Schule.
  35. Sammelrezension: Siegfried, Detlev/von Hodenberg, Christina: “Wo ‘1968’ liegt. Reform und Revolte in der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik” – Gilcher-Holtey, Ingrid: “1968. Eine Zeitreise”