Das Reflexivitätsproblem und die Kategorienlehre: Versuch einer Aktualisierung
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
Das Reflexivitätsproblem und die Kategorienlehre : Versuch einer Aktualisierung. / Schmieg, Gregor.
Nicolai Hartmanns Neue Ontologie und die Philosophische Anthropologie: Menschliches Leben in Natur und Geist. Hrsg. / Moritz von Kalckreuth; Gregor Schmieg; Friedrich Hausen. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2019. S. 63-88 (Philosophische Anthropologie; Band 11).Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Das Reflexivitätsproblem und die Kategorienlehre
T2 - Versuch einer Aktualisierung
AU - Schmieg, Gregor
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - The present paper starts by arguing that a systematically important distinction between two forms of reflexiveness is tenable. The first emphasizes acts involving a human subject whereas the second transcends this category and is better pronounced as an ontological - possibly ecological - relation. The distinction itself is framed as a proactive problem invigorating a certain strand in the history of philosophy dealing with biological questions since Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Sketching out the genealogy then allows for contextualizing the method of categorical exposition insofar as it is deployed for conceptualizing living beings inHartmann and Plessner. In so doing the categorical difference of upward and downward causation is introduced while seizing upon Hegel’s ontology of logical grounding. Finally, the mathematically inspired concept of a reflexive closure operator summarizes the whole argument while relating both Hartmann’s and Plessner’s thought to current trends in the philosophy of science and also to some empirical contexts indicated in recent complex systems related research.
AB - The present paper starts by arguing that a systematically important distinction between two forms of reflexiveness is tenable. The first emphasizes acts involving a human subject whereas the second transcends this category and is better pronounced as an ontological - possibly ecological - relation. The distinction itself is framed as a proactive problem invigorating a certain strand in the history of philosophy dealing with biological questions since Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Sketching out the genealogy then allows for contextualizing the method of categorical exposition insofar as it is deployed for conceptualizing living beings inHartmann and Plessner. In so doing the categorical difference of upward and downward causation is introduced while seizing upon Hegel’s ontology of logical grounding. Finally, the mathematically inspired concept of a reflexive closure operator summarizes the whole argument while relating both Hartmann’s and Plessner’s thought to current trends in the philosophy of science and also to some empirical contexts indicated in recent complex systems related research.
KW - Philosophie
U2 - 10.1515/9783110615555-006
DO - 10.1515/9783110615555-006
M3 - Aufsätze in Sammelwerken
SN - 978-3-11-061390-2
T3 - Philosophische Anthropologie
SP - 63
EP - 88
BT - Nicolai Hartmanns Neue Ontologie und die Philosophische Anthropologie
A2 - von Kalckreuth, Moritz
A2 - Schmieg, Gregor
A2 - Hausen, Friedrich
PB - Walter de Gruyter GmbH
ER -