Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research. / Milcu, Andra Ioana; Hanspach, J.; Abson, D. et al.
in: Ecology and Society, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 3, 44, 01.09.2013.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{218f4d1cdc63476a9289932da17cb509,
title = "Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research",
abstract = "Cultural ecosystem services constitute a growing field of research that is characterized by an increasing number of publications from various academic disciplines. We conducted a semiquantitative review of publications explicitly dealing with cultural ecosystem services. Our aims were: (1) to provide an overview of the current state of research, (2) to classify the diversity of research approaches by identifying clusters of publications that address cultural ecosystem services in similar ways, and (3) to highlight some important challenges for the future of cultural ecosystem services research. We reviewed 107 publications and extracted 20 attributes describing their type and content, including methods, scales, drivers of change, and trade-offs between services. Using a cluster analysis on a subset of attributes we identified five groups of publications: Group 1, conceptual focus, deals with theoretical issues; Group 2, descriptive reviews, consists mostly of desktop studies; Group 3, localized outcomes, deals with case studies coming from different disciplines; Group 4, social and participatory, deals mainly with assessing preferences and perceptions; and Group 5, economic assessments, provides economic valuations. Emerging themes in cultural ecosystem services research relate to improving methods for cultural ecosystem services valuation, studying cultural ecosystem services in the context of ecosystem service bundles, and more clearly articulating policy implications. Based on our findings, we conclude that: (1) cultural ecosystem services are well placed as a tool to bridge gaps between different academic disciplines and research communities, (2) capitalizing on the societal relevance of cultural ecosystem services could help address real-world problems, and (3) cultural ecosystem services have the potential to foster new conceptual links between alternative logics relating to a variety of social and ecological issues.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Aesthetic values, Bundling, CES valuation, Cluster analysis, Cultural heritage, Cultural landscapes, Drivers of change, Intangible benefits, Landscape values, Nonuse values, Policy implications, Recreation and ecotourism",
author = "Milcu, {Andra Ioana} and J. Hanspach and D. Abson and J. Fischer",
year = "2013",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5751/ES-05790-180344",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cultural ecosystem services

T2 - A literature review and prospects for future research

AU - Milcu, Andra Ioana

AU - Hanspach, J.

AU - Abson, D.

AU - Fischer, J.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Cultural ecosystem services constitute a growing field of research that is characterized by an increasing number of publications from various academic disciplines. We conducted a semiquantitative review of publications explicitly dealing with cultural ecosystem services. Our aims were: (1) to provide an overview of the current state of research, (2) to classify the diversity of research approaches by identifying clusters of publications that address cultural ecosystem services in similar ways, and (3) to highlight some important challenges for the future of cultural ecosystem services research. We reviewed 107 publications and extracted 20 attributes describing their type and content, including methods, scales, drivers of change, and trade-offs between services. Using a cluster analysis on a subset of attributes we identified five groups of publications: Group 1, conceptual focus, deals with theoretical issues; Group 2, descriptive reviews, consists mostly of desktop studies; Group 3, localized outcomes, deals with case studies coming from different disciplines; Group 4, social and participatory, deals mainly with assessing preferences and perceptions; and Group 5, economic assessments, provides economic valuations. Emerging themes in cultural ecosystem services research relate to improving methods for cultural ecosystem services valuation, studying cultural ecosystem services in the context of ecosystem service bundles, and more clearly articulating policy implications. Based on our findings, we conclude that: (1) cultural ecosystem services are well placed as a tool to bridge gaps between different academic disciplines and research communities, (2) capitalizing on the societal relevance of cultural ecosystem services could help address real-world problems, and (3) cultural ecosystem services have the potential to foster new conceptual links between alternative logics relating to a variety of social and ecological issues.

AB - Cultural ecosystem services constitute a growing field of research that is characterized by an increasing number of publications from various academic disciplines. We conducted a semiquantitative review of publications explicitly dealing with cultural ecosystem services. Our aims were: (1) to provide an overview of the current state of research, (2) to classify the diversity of research approaches by identifying clusters of publications that address cultural ecosystem services in similar ways, and (3) to highlight some important challenges for the future of cultural ecosystem services research. We reviewed 107 publications and extracted 20 attributes describing their type and content, including methods, scales, drivers of change, and trade-offs between services. Using a cluster analysis on a subset of attributes we identified five groups of publications: Group 1, conceptual focus, deals with theoretical issues; Group 2, descriptive reviews, consists mostly of desktop studies; Group 3, localized outcomes, deals with case studies coming from different disciplines; Group 4, social and participatory, deals mainly with assessing preferences and perceptions; and Group 5, economic assessments, provides economic valuations. Emerging themes in cultural ecosystem services research relate to improving methods for cultural ecosystem services valuation, studying cultural ecosystem services in the context of ecosystem service bundles, and more clearly articulating policy implications. Based on our findings, we conclude that: (1) cultural ecosystem services are well placed as a tool to bridge gaps between different academic disciplines and research communities, (2) capitalizing on the societal relevance of cultural ecosystem services could help address real-world problems, and (3) cultural ecosystem services have the potential to foster new conceptual links between alternative logics relating to a variety of social and ecological issues.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Aesthetic values

KW - Bundling

KW - CES valuation

KW - Cluster analysis

KW - Cultural heritage

KW - Cultural landscapes

KW - Drivers of change

KW - Intangible benefits

KW - Landscape values

KW - Nonuse values

KW - Policy implications

KW - Recreation and ecotourism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884971346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/40d9cea9-b2c1-3e1e-87d5-c9ae6c512444/

U2 - 10.5751/ES-05790-180344

DO - 10.5751/ES-05790-180344

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84884971346

VL - 18

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 3

M1 - 44

ER -

Dokumente

DOI