Cross-pollination benefits differ among oilseed rape varieties

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Cross-pollination benefits differ among oilseed rape varieties. / Hudewenz, Anika; Pufal, Gesine; Bögeholz, Anna-Lena et al.
in: The Journal of Agricultural Science, Jahrgang 152, Nr. 5, 14.10.2014, S. 770-778.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{28fb2d9aedb343b0aaa8b5b961bfc018,
title = "Cross-pollination benefits differ among oilseed rape varieties",
abstract = "SUMMARY Winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) is an important crop for human consumption and biofuel production and its production is increasing worldwide. It is generally assumed that cross-pollination by insects increases oilseed rape yield but testing of this has been restricted to a few rapeseed varieties and produced varying results. The present study determines whether cross-pollination benefits a number of oilseed rape varieties by comparing yield in the presence and absence of insects. Four rapeseed varieties (Sherlock, Traviata, Treffer and Visby) were used with ten individuals each in four pollination treatments: (1) supplementary hand-pollination, (2) open pollination with insects able to access the flowers, (3) wind pollination and (4) autonomous self-pollination. Across all four varieties, open and supplementary hand-pollination treatments resulted in higher fruit set, numbers of seeds per pod and seed yield compared with wind and self-pollination. The cross-pollination benefits, however, differed among rapeseed varieties: Treffer and Visby had a higher dependence on open (insects) and supplementary cross-pollination than Sherlock and Traviata. Across all four varieties, seed weight compensated for reduced fruit set and was highest when plants were self-pollinated. The present results highlight the importance of considering varietal differences in crop pollination research. Information on the pollination requirements of crop varieties is required by farmers to optimize management decisions in a world of increasing agropollination deficits.",
keywords = "Biology, autogamy, biofuel, cost-benefit analysis, insect, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Anika Hudewenz and Gesine Pufal and Anna-Lena B{\"o}geholz and Alexandra-Maria Klein",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1017/S0021859613000440",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "770--778",
journal = "The Journal of Agricultural Science",
issn = "0021-8596",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-pollination benefits differ among oilseed rape varieties

AU - Hudewenz, Anika

AU - Pufal, Gesine

AU - Bögeholz, Anna-Lena

AU - Klein, Alexandra-Maria

PY - 2014/10/14

Y1 - 2014/10/14

N2 - SUMMARY Winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) is an important crop for human consumption and biofuel production and its production is increasing worldwide. It is generally assumed that cross-pollination by insects increases oilseed rape yield but testing of this has been restricted to a few rapeseed varieties and produced varying results. The present study determines whether cross-pollination benefits a number of oilseed rape varieties by comparing yield in the presence and absence of insects. Four rapeseed varieties (Sherlock, Traviata, Treffer and Visby) were used with ten individuals each in four pollination treatments: (1) supplementary hand-pollination, (2) open pollination with insects able to access the flowers, (3) wind pollination and (4) autonomous self-pollination. Across all four varieties, open and supplementary hand-pollination treatments resulted in higher fruit set, numbers of seeds per pod and seed yield compared with wind and self-pollination. The cross-pollination benefits, however, differed among rapeseed varieties: Treffer and Visby had a higher dependence on open (insects) and supplementary cross-pollination than Sherlock and Traviata. Across all four varieties, seed weight compensated for reduced fruit set and was highest when plants were self-pollinated. The present results highlight the importance of considering varietal differences in crop pollination research. Information on the pollination requirements of crop varieties is required by farmers to optimize management decisions in a world of increasing agropollination deficits.

AB - SUMMARY Winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) is an important crop for human consumption and biofuel production and its production is increasing worldwide. It is generally assumed that cross-pollination by insects increases oilseed rape yield but testing of this has been restricted to a few rapeseed varieties and produced varying results. The present study determines whether cross-pollination benefits a number of oilseed rape varieties by comparing yield in the presence and absence of insects. Four rapeseed varieties (Sherlock, Traviata, Treffer and Visby) were used with ten individuals each in four pollination treatments: (1) supplementary hand-pollination, (2) open pollination with insects able to access the flowers, (3) wind pollination and (4) autonomous self-pollination. Across all four varieties, open and supplementary hand-pollination treatments resulted in higher fruit set, numbers of seeds per pod and seed yield compared with wind and self-pollination. The cross-pollination benefits, however, differed among rapeseed varieties: Treffer and Visby had a higher dependence on open (insects) and supplementary cross-pollination than Sherlock and Traviata. Across all four varieties, seed weight compensated for reduced fruit set and was highest when plants were self-pollinated. The present results highlight the importance of considering varietal differences in crop pollination research. Information on the pollination requirements of crop varieties is required by farmers to optimize management decisions in a world of increasing agropollination deficits.

KW - Biology

KW - autogamy

KW - biofuel

KW - cost-benefit analysis

KW - insect

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898424875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0021859613000440

DO - 10.1017/S0021859613000440

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 152

SP - 770

EP - 778

JO - The Journal of Agricultural Science

JF - The Journal of Agricultural Science

SN - 0021-8596

IS - 5

ER -

DOI