Concerns about cultural neurosciences: A critical analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Concerns about cultural neurosciences: A critical analysis. / Martínez Mateo, Marina; Cabanis, Maurice; Loebell, Nicole Cruz de Echeverría et al.
in: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Jahrgang 36, Nr. 1, 01.2012, S. 152-161.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

Martínez Mateo, M, Cabanis, M, Loebell, NCDE & Krach, S 2012, 'Concerns about cultural neurosciences: A critical analysis', Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Jg. 36, Nr. 1, S. 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.006

APA

Martínez Mateo, M., Cabanis, M., Loebell, N. C. D. E., & Krach, S. (2012). Concerns about cultural neurosciences: A critical analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(1), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.006

Vancouver

Martínez Mateo M, Cabanis M, Loebell NCDE, Krach S. Concerns about cultural neurosciences: A critical analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2012 Jan;36(1):152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.006

Bibtex

@article{4948d42a023d4fb395c9befdfef8f28e,
title = "Concerns about cultural neurosciences: A critical analysis",
abstract = "Ten years ago, neuroscientists began to study cultural phenomena by using functional MRI. Since then the number of publications in this field, termed cultural neuroscience (CN), has tremendously increased. In these studies, particular concepts of culture are implied, but rarely explicitly discussed. We argue that it is necessary to make these concepts a topic of debate in order to unravel the foundations of CN. From 40 fMRI studies we extracted two strands of reasoning: models investigating universal mechanisms for the formation of cultural groups and habits and, models assessing differences in characteristics among cultural groups. Both strands simplify culture as an inflexible set of traits and specificities. We question this rigid understanding of culture and highlight its hidden evaluative nature.",
keywords = "Cultural neuroscience, Differentialism, FMRI, Looping effect, Universalism, Philosophy",
author = "{Mart{\'i}nez Mateo}, Marina and Maurice Cabanis and Loebell, {Nicole Cruz de Echeverr{\'i}a} and S{\"o}ren Krach",
year = "2012",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "152--161",
journal = "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",
issn = "0149-7634",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concerns about cultural neurosciences

T2 - A critical analysis

AU - Martínez Mateo, Marina

AU - Cabanis, Maurice

AU - Loebell, Nicole Cruz de Echeverría

AU - Krach, Sören

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Ten years ago, neuroscientists began to study cultural phenomena by using functional MRI. Since then the number of publications in this field, termed cultural neuroscience (CN), has tremendously increased. In these studies, particular concepts of culture are implied, but rarely explicitly discussed. We argue that it is necessary to make these concepts a topic of debate in order to unravel the foundations of CN. From 40 fMRI studies we extracted two strands of reasoning: models investigating universal mechanisms for the formation of cultural groups and habits and, models assessing differences in characteristics among cultural groups. Both strands simplify culture as an inflexible set of traits and specificities. We question this rigid understanding of culture and highlight its hidden evaluative nature.

AB - Ten years ago, neuroscientists began to study cultural phenomena by using functional MRI. Since then the number of publications in this field, termed cultural neuroscience (CN), has tremendously increased. In these studies, particular concepts of culture are implied, but rarely explicitly discussed. We argue that it is necessary to make these concepts a topic of debate in order to unravel the foundations of CN. From 40 fMRI studies we extracted two strands of reasoning: models investigating universal mechanisms for the formation of cultural groups and habits and, models assessing differences in characteristics among cultural groups. Both strands simplify culture as an inflexible set of traits and specificities. We question this rigid understanding of culture and highlight its hidden evaluative nature.

KW - Cultural neuroscience

KW - Differentialism

KW - FMRI

KW - Looping effect

KW - Universalism

KW - Philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82855178833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.006

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 21620886

AN - SCOPUS:82855178833

VL - 36

SP - 152

EP - 161

JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

SN - 0149-7634

IS - 1

ER -

DOI